search for: bootstage

Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "bootstage".

Did you mean: bootimage
2016 May 17
0
[PATCH v2 4/6] pv-qspinlock: powerpc support pv-qspinlock
As we need let pv-qspinlock-kernel run on all environment which might have no powervm, we should runtime choose which qspinlock version to use. The default pv-qspinlock use native version. pv_lock initialization should be done in bootstage with irq disabled. And if possible, restore pv_lock_ops callbacks to pv version. Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan at linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/qspinlock.h | 17 +++++++++ arch/powerpc/include/asm/qspinlock_paravirt.h | 38 +++++++++++++++++++ ....
2016 May 17
6
[PATCH v3 0/6] powerpc use pv-qpsinlock instead of spinlock
change fome v1: separate into 6 pathes from one patch some minor code changes. benchmark test results are below. run 3 tests on pseries IBM,8408-E8E with 32cpus, 64GB memory perf bench futex hash perf bench futex lock-pi perf record -advRT || perf bench sched messaging -g 1000 || perf report summary: _____test________________spinlcok______________pv-qspinlcok_____ |futex hash | 556370 ops |
2016 May 17
6
[PATCH v3 0/6] powerpc use pv-qpsinlock instead of spinlock
change fome v1: separate into 6 pathes from one patch some minor code changes. benchmark test results are below. run 3 tests on pseries IBM,8408-E8E with 32cpus, 64GB memory perf bench futex hash perf bench futex lock-pi perf record -advRT || perf bench sched messaging -g 1000 || perf report summary: _____test________________spinlcok______________pv-qspinlcok_____ |futex hash | 556370 ops |
2016 May 25
10
[PATCH v3 0/6] powerpc use pv-qpsinlock as the default spinlock implemention
change from v2: __spin_yeild_cpu() will yield slices to lpar if target cpu is running. remove unnecessary rmb() in __spin_yield/wake_cpu. __pv_wait() will check the *ptr == val. some commit message change change fome v1: separate into 6 pathes from one patch some minor code changes. I do several tests on pseries IBM,8408-E8E with 32cpus, 64GB memory. benchmark test results are below. 2
2016 May 25
10
[PATCH v3 0/6] powerpc use pv-qpsinlock as the default spinlock implemention
change from v2: __spin_yeild_cpu() will yield slices to lpar if target cpu is running. remove unnecessary rmb() in __spin_yield/wake_cpu. __pv_wait() will check the *ptr == val. some commit message change change fome v1: separate into 6 pathes from one patch some minor code changes. I do several tests on pseries IBM,8408-E8E with 32cpus, 64GB memory. benchmark test results are below. 2
2016 Jun 02
9
[PATCH v5 0/6] powerPC/pSeries use pv-qpsinlock as the default spinlock implemention
change from v4: BUG FIX. thanks boqun reporting this issue. struct __qspinlock has different layout in bigendian mahcine. native_queued_spin_unlock() may write value to a wrong address. now fix it. sorry for not even doing a test on bigendian machine before!!! change from v3: a big change in [PATCH v4 4/6] pv-qspinlock: powerpc support pv-qspinlock no other patch changed. and the patch
2016 Jun 02
9
[PATCH v5 0/6] powerPC/pSeries use pv-qpsinlock as the default spinlock implemention
change from v4: BUG FIX. thanks boqun reporting this issue. struct __qspinlock has different layout in bigendian mahcine. native_queued_spin_unlock() may write value to a wrong address. now fix it. sorry for not even doing a test on bigendian machine before!!! change from v3: a big change in [PATCH v4 4/6] pv-qspinlock: powerpc support pv-qspinlock no other patch changed. and the patch
2016 Jun 02
8
[PATCH v5 0/6] powerPC/pSeries use pv-qpsinlock as the default spinlock implemention
From: root <root at ltcalpine2-lp13.aus.stglabs.ibm.com> change from v4: BUG FIX. thanks boqun reporting this issue. struct __qspinlock has different layout in bigendian mahcine. native_queued_spin_unlock() may write value to a wrong address. now fix it. change from v3: a big change in [PATCH v4 4/6] pv-qspinlock: powerpc support pv-qspinlock no other patch changed. and the patch
2016 Jun 02
8
[PATCH v5 0/6] powerPC/pSeries use pv-qpsinlock as the default spinlock implemention
From: root <root at ltcalpine2-lp13.aus.stglabs.ibm.com> change from v4: BUG FIX. thanks boqun reporting this issue. struct __qspinlock has different layout in bigendian mahcine. native_queued_spin_unlock() may write value to a wrong address. now fix it. change from v3: a big change in [PATCH v4 4/6] pv-qspinlock: powerpc support pv-qspinlock no other patch changed. and the patch
2016 Dec 06
6
[PATCH v9 0/6] Implement qspinlock/pv-qspinlock on ppc
Hi All, this is the fairlock patchset. You can apply them and build successfully. patches are based on linux-next qspinlock can avoid waiter starved issue. It has about the same speed in single-thread and it can be much faster in high contention situations especially when the spinlock is embedded within the data structure to be protected. v8 -> v9: mv qspinlocm config entry to
2016 Dec 06
6
[PATCH v9 0/6] Implement qspinlock/pv-qspinlock on ppc
Hi All, this is the fairlock patchset. You can apply them and build successfully. patches are based on linux-next qspinlock can avoid waiter starved issue. It has about the same speed in single-thread and it can be much faster in high contention situations especially when the spinlock is embedded within the data structure to be protected. v8 -> v9: mv qspinlocm config entry to
2016 Dec 05
9
[PATCH v8 0/6] Implement qspinlock/pv-qspinlock on ppc
Hi All, this is the fairlock patchset. You can apply them and build successfully. patches are based on linux-next qspinlock can avoid waiter starved issue. It has about the same speed in single-thread and it can be much faster in high contention situations especially when the spinlock is embedded within the data structure to be protected. v7 -> v8: add one patch to drop a function call
2016 Dec 05
9
[PATCH v8 0/6] Implement qspinlock/pv-qspinlock on ppc
Hi All, this is the fairlock patchset. You can apply them and build successfully. patches are based on linux-next qspinlock can avoid waiter starved issue. It has about the same speed in single-thread and it can be much faster in high contention situations especially when the spinlock is embedded within the data structure to be protected. v7 -> v8: add one patch to drop a function call