search for: boot_gdt_descr

Displaying 19 results from an estimated 19 matches for "boot_gdt_descr".

2020 May 18
2
[PATCH v3 31/75] x86/head/64: Install boot GDT
...at 05:16:41PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > @@ -480,6 +500,22 @@ SYM_DATA_LOCAL(early_gdt_descr_base, .quad INIT_PER_CPU_VAR(gdt_page)) > SYM_DATA(phys_base, .quad 0x0) > EXPORT_SYMBOL(phys_base) > > +/* Boot GDT used when kernel addresses are not mapped yet */ > +SYM_DATA_LOCAL(boot_gdt_descr, .word boot_gdt_end - boot_gdt) > +SYM_DATA_LOCAL(boot_gdt_base, .quad 0) > +SYM_DATA_START(boot_gdt) > + .quad 0 > + .quad 0x00cf9a000000ffff /* __KERNEL32_CS */ > + .quad 0x00af9a000000ffff /* __KERNEL_CS */ > + .quad 0x00cf92000000ffff /* __KERNEL_DS */ > + .quad 0...
2020 May 18
2
[PATCH v3 31/75] x86/head/64: Install boot GDT
...at 05:16:41PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > @@ -480,6 +500,22 @@ SYM_DATA_LOCAL(early_gdt_descr_base, .quad INIT_PER_CPU_VAR(gdt_page)) > SYM_DATA(phys_base, .quad 0x0) > EXPORT_SYMBOL(phys_base) > > +/* Boot GDT used when kernel addresses are not mapped yet */ > +SYM_DATA_LOCAL(boot_gdt_descr, .word boot_gdt_end - boot_gdt) > +SYM_DATA_LOCAL(boot_gdt_base, .quad 0) > +SYM_DATA_START(boot_gdt) > + .quad 0 > + .quad 0x00cf9a000000ffff /* __KERNEL32_CS */ > + .quad 0x00af9a000000ffff /* __KERNEL_CS */ > + .quad 0x00cf92000000ffff /* __KERNEL_DS */ > + .quad 0...
2020 Jun 04
0
[PATCH v3 31/75] x86/head/64: Install boot GDT
...edel wrote: > > @@ -480,6 +500,22 @@ SYM_DATA_LOCAL(early_gdt_descr_base, .quad INIT_PER_CPU_VAR(gdt_page)) > > SYM_DATA(phys_base, .quad 0x0) > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(phys_base) > > > > +/* Boot GDT used when kernel addresses are not mapped yet */ > > +SYM_DATA_LOCAL(boot_gdt_descr, .word boot_gdt_end - boot_gdt) > > +SYM_DATA_LOCAL(boot_gdt_base, .quad 0) > > +SYM_DATA_START(boot_gdt) > > + .quad 0 > > + .quad 0x00cf9a000000ffff /* __KERNEL32_CS */ > > + .quad 0x00af9a000000ffff /* __KERNEL_CS */ > > + .quad 0x00cf92000000ffff /* _...
2020 Feb 11
0
[PATCH 25/62] x86/head/64: Install boot GDT
...-72,6 +72,20 @@ SYM_CODE_START_NOALIGN(startup_64) /* Set up the stack for verify_cpu(), similar to initial_stack below */ leaq (__end_init_task - SIZEOF_PTREGS)(%rip), %rsp + /* Setup boot GDT descriptor and load boot GDT */ + leaq boot_gdt(%rip), %rax + movq %rax, boot_gdt_base(%rip) + lgdt boot_gdt_descr(%rip) + + /* GDT loaded - switch to __KERNEL_CS so IRET works reliably */ + pushq $__KERNEL_CS + leaq .Lon_kernel_cs(%rip), %rax + pushq %rax + lretq + +.Lon_kernel_cs: + UNWIND_HINT_EMPTY + /* Sanitize CPU configuration */ call verify_cpu @@ -480,6 +494,18 @@ SYM_DATA_LOCAL(early_gdt_descr_b...
2020 Apr 28
0
[PATCH v3 31/75] x86/head/64: Install boot GDT
...-72,6 +72,26 @@ SYM_CODE_START_NOALIGN(startup_64) /* Set up the stack for verify_cpu(), similar to initial_stack below */ leaq (__end_init_task - SIZEOF_PTREGS)(%rip), %rsp + /* Setup boot GDT descriptor and load boot GDT */ + leaq boot_gdt(%rip), %rax + movq %rax, boot_gdt_base(%rip) + lgdt boot_gdt_descr(%rip) + + /* New GDT is live - reload data segment registers */ + movl $__KERNEL_DS, %eax + movl %eax, %ds + movl %eax, %ss + movl %eax, %es + + /* Now switch to __KERNEL_CS so IRET works reliably */ + pushq $__KERNEL_CS + leaq .Lon_kernel_cs(%rip), %rax + pushq %rax + lretq + +.Lon_kernel_cs: + UN...
2020 Feb 11
1
[PATCH 25/62] x86/head/64: Install boot GDT
...ck for verify_cpu(), similar to initial_stack below */ > leaq (__end_init_task - SIZEOF_PTREGS)(%rip), %rsp > > + /* Setup boot GDT descriptor and load boot GDT */ > + leaq boot_gdt(%rip), %rax > + movq %rax, boot_gdt_base(%rip) > + lgdt boot_gdt_descr(%rip) > + > + /* GDT loaded - switch to __KERNEL_CS so IRET works reliably */ > + pushq $__KERNEL_CS > + leaq .Lon_kernel_cs(%rip), %rax > + pushq %rax > + lretq > + > +.Lon_kernel_cs: > + UNWIND_HINT_EMPTY I would suggest fixin...
2007 Jun 06
7
[PATCH RFC 0/7] proposed updates to boot protocol and paravirt booting
This series: 1. Updates the boot protocol to version 2.07 2. Clean up the existing build process, to get rid of tools/build and make the linker do more heavy lifting 3. Make the bzImage payload an ELF file. The bootloader can extract this as a naked ELF file by skipping over boot_params.setup_sects worth of 16-bit setup code. 4. Update the boot_params to 2.07, and update the
2007 Jun 06
7
[PATCH RFC 0/7] proposed updates to boot protocol and paravirt booting
This series: 1. Updates the boot protocol to version 2.07 2. Clean up the existing build process, to get rid of tools/build and make the linker do more heavy lifting 3. Make the bzImage payload an ELF file. The bootloader can extract this as a naked ELF file by skipping over boot_params.setup_sects worth of 16-bit setup code. 4. Update the boot_params to 2.07, and update the
2007 Jun 15
11
[PATCH 00/10] paravirt/subarchitecture boot protocol
This series updates the boot protocol to 2.07 and uses it to implement paravirtual booting. This allows the bootloader to tell the kernel what kind of hardware/pseudo-hardware environment it's coming up under, and the kernel can use the appropriate boot sequence code. Specifically: - Update the boot protocol to 2.07, which adds fields to specify the hardware subarchitecture and some
2007 Jun 15
11
[PATCH 00/10] paravirt/subarchitecture boot protocol
This series updates the boot protocol to 2.07 and uses it to implement paravirtual booting. This allows the bootloader to tell the kernel what kind of hardware/pseudo-hardware environment it's coming up under, and the kernel can use the appropriate boot sequence code. Specifically: - Update the boot protocol to 2.07, which adds fields to specify the hardware subarchitecture and some
2007 Jun 15
11
[PATCH 00/10] paravirt/subarchitecture boot protocol
This series updates the boot protocol to 2.07 and uses it to implement paravirtual booting. This allows the bootloader to tell the kernel what kind of hardware/pseudo-hardware environment it's coming up under, and the kernel can use the appropriate boot sequence code. Specifically: - Update the boot protocol to 2.07, which adds fields to specify the hardware subarchitecture and some
2007 Jun 20
9
[PATCH 0/9] x86 boot protocol updates
[ This patch depends on the cross-architecture ELF cleanup patch. ] This series updates the boot protocol to 2.07 and uses it to implement paravirtual booting. This allows the bootloader to tell the kernel what kind of hardware/pseudo-hardware environment it's coming up under, and the kernel can use the appropriate boot sequence code. Specifically: - Update the boot protocol to 2.07, which
2007 Jun 20
9
[PATCH 0/9] x86 boot protocol updates
[ This patch depends on the cross-architecture ELF cleanup patch. ] This series updates the boot protocol to 2.07 and uses it to implement paravirtual booting. This allows the bootloader to tell the kernel what kind of hardware/pseudo-hardware environment it's coming up under, and the kernel can use the appropriate boot sequence code. Specifically: - Update the boot protocol to 2.07, which
2020 Jul 14
92
[PATCH v4 00/75] x86: SEV-ES Guest Support
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is the fourth version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches. I addressed the review comments sent to me for the previous version and rebased the code v5.8-rc5. The biggest change in this version is the IST handling code for the #VC handler. I adapted the entry code for the #VC handler to the big pile of entry code changes merged into
2020 Jul 14
92
[PATCH v4 00/75] x86: SEV-ES Guest Support
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is the fourth version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches. I addressed the review comments sent to me for the previous version and rebased the code v5.8-rc5. The biggest change in this version is the IST handling code for the #VC handler. I adapted the entry code for the #VC handler to the big pile of entry code changes merged into
2020 Feb 11
83
[RFC PATCH 00/62] Linux as SEV-ES Guest Support
Hi, here is the first public post of the patch-set to enable Linux to run under SEV-ES enabled hypervisors. The code is mostly feature-complete, but there are still a couple of bugs to fix. Nevertheless, given the size of the patch-set, I think it is about time to ask for initial feedback of the changes that come with it. To better understand the code here is a quick explanation of SEV-ES first.
2020 Feb 11
83
[RFC PATCH 00/62] Linux as SEV-ES Guest Support
Hi, here is the first public post of the patch-set to enable Linux to run under SEV-ES enabled hypervisors. The code is mostly feature-complete, but there are still a couple of bugs to fix. Nevertheless, given the size of the patch-set, I think it is about time to ask for initial feedback of the changes that come with it. To better understand the code here is a quick explanation of SEV-ES first.
2020 Apr 28
116
[PATCH v3 00/75] x86: SEV-ES Guest Support
Hi, here is the next version of changes to enable Linux to run as an SEV-ES guest. The code was rebased to v5.7-rc3 and got a fair number of changes since the last version. What is SEV-ES ============== SEV-ES is an acronym for 'Secure Encrypted Virtualization - Encrypted State' and means a hardware feature of AMD processors which hides the register state of VCPUs to the hypervisor by
2020 Apr 28
116
[PATCH v3 00/75] x86: SEV-ES Guest Support
Hi, here is the next version of changes to enable Linux to run as an SEV-ES guest. The code was rebased to v5.7-rc3 and got a fair number of changes since the last version. What is SEV-ES ============== SEV-ES is an acronym for 'Secure Encrypted Virtualization - Encrypted State' and means a hardware feature of AMD processors which hides the register state of VCPUs to the hypervisor by