search for: boosted

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:1187 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1187.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 4d9890eb6188a0e2b4cb664cec93cae75a4df4e2ef1f6360b4f9405e495f0175 boost-1.41.0-18.el6.i686.rpm 9856b6443740b8cbb217adeb51d90da211a5d395284712ec9e04554e2366eff7

CentOS Errata and BugFix Advisory 2015:C001 Upstream details at : http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=8117 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 6044ee7a7863e087a32391c31d94e030abf7d6d5d74dff8a6bd96cd32c5c63ca boost-1.41.0-25.el6.centos.i686.rpm bff46f66bdf08d7af49f2579070a2986489f4d0cf2fc50fbefb1db1bbf8b4b44

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

I tried building boost 1.45 release with clang 2.9 following instructions on http://blog.llvm.org/2010/05/clang-builds-boost.html but got the following result: $ clang++ --version clang version 2.9 (trunk 123420) Target: x86_64-apple-darwin10 Thread model: posix $ ./bjam toolset=clang Building the Boost C++ Libraries. Performing configuration checks - has_icu builds : no

I am getting all these messages when run `passenger-status''. Do I need to worry about this? I am using passenger 2.2.2 with puppet 0.24.8 and apache2 on ubuntu 9.04. I installed it using the wiki http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/UsingPassenger Thread ''Main thread'': in ''int Server::start()'' (ApplicationPoolServerExecutable.cpp:553)

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

In my code here https://github.com/DragonOsman/currency_converter , I used C++17 and managed to get it to work (though I'm only using std::map::insert_or_assign() from C++17). And I'm using Windows, so I shouldn't use LDFLAGS or CXXFLAGS as environment variables. I'll use them directly on the compiler command line instead. The libraries I need to link against are

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Are you linking with a C++ compiler? A lot of those missing symbols look like they come from the C++ standard library. -David Osman Zakir via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > @blubee blubeeme So what do you think? Got any ideas? > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > From: Osman Zakir <osmanzakir90

I couldn't get it to build libcxx... You need c++ and c++abi to compile c++ code. On Wed, Dec 12, 2018, 07:01 Osman Zakir via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > LLVM on a Developer Command Prompt. The ones I want to fix first are the > ones from Boost and Jinja2Cpp. I saw some from those as well. > > If there any standard library ones missing, could it be

2008/12/27 Mark Kromis <greybird at mac.com> > Just a curiosity question, why push for gtest vs Boost Test or > a different test suite? > I normally use Boost, and their test suite, so I'm more familiar with that. > So I was wondering is one better then the other, or is it just that someone > makes a patch for it? > I looked more into Boost.Test to see what's in

I'm not sure if I should bother you team with this, apologies in case it's a bother. I'm trying gcc 6.2.1 (from devtoolset-6) with R, everything seems to work just fine, except for mzR. Here is failed build: g++ -m64 -shared -L/usr/lib64/R/lib -Wl,-z,relro -o mzR.so cramp.o ramp_base64.o ramp.o RcppRamp.o RcppRampModule.o rnetCDF.o RcppPwiz.o RcppPwizModule.o RcppIdent.o

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

So how do I get it to build libcxx and libcxxabi? I got it from the mono repo and enabled lld, clang, libcxx and libcxxabi. But I built the two main CMake targets only--all_build and install. What else do I have to do? Please let me know. ________________________________ From: Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 11:10 AM To: blubee blubeeme Cc: Osman

How can I tell CMake during the configuration step where to find my zlib installation? ________________________________ From: blubee blubeeme <gurenchan at gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 7:31 PM To: Osman Zakir Cc: llvm-dev Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Using LLD to link against third-party libraries? How? I would agree with the next email from Brian Cain If you do not have

In the llvm file include/llvm/Support/DataTypes.h (.in/.cmake), for MSVCit defines some macros that are defined in the cstdint.hpp file in boost (and boost does it better, detailed below): The basic error is: R:\SDKs\boost\built_head\include\boost-1_38\boost/cstdint.hpp(347) : warning C4005: 'INT8_C' : macro redefinition

On Dec 27, 2008, at 7:41 PM, Misha Brukman wrote: > 2008/12/27 Mark Kromis <greybird at mac.com> > Just a curiosity question, why push for gtest vs Boost Test or a > different test suite? > I normally use Boost, and their test suite, so I'm more familiar > with that. So I was wondering is one better then the other, or is it > just that someone makes a patch for

I do this on a vanilla-clean R installation, simply: > biocLite("mzR") it pulls some deps in which compile fine, only mzR fails. ... meanwhile... I grabbed devtools and comiled github master - still fails. Should I attach build log? One should not send attachments to the list.. I don't suppose? On 21/12/16 17:06, Martin Morgan wrote: > mzR is a Bioconductor package, so

I already mentioned what flag I tried. It's in the first email in this thread. And I want to link against Boost.System and the Jinja2Cpp library (the latter's documentation can be found here: https://github.com/flexferrum/Jinja2Cpp . And I also have some GUI applications using FLTK as well that I want to try to build using LLVM as well, so I'll have to know how to link against

On 22/09/05, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > Couldn't you state the explicit namespaces. So not using "using > namespace llvm" and instead prefix all calls with "llvm::"? The header files in boost do not use fully-qualified tie(). I probably should not modify them. But my .cpp file #include them. I hope I could "using namespace" boost