search for: bookjovi

Displaying 18 results from an estimated 18 matches for "bookjovi".

2013 Apr 29
0
[LLVMdev] A new mechanism to compiler kernel modules using llvm: Defer type evaluation in clang?
..." The problem is you wish to link in the linux kernel headers at "install" time. The problem I see is that the linux kernel headers are C source files, so how is that going to work? You need a C compiler to understand the Linux kernel headers. On 28 April 2013 17:42, Jovi Zhang <bookjovi at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > First of all, I didn't study on compiler too much, I'm a Linux kernel developer, > Now I have one idea about compile kernel module by using llvm framework. > > In Linux world, traditionally compile Linux kernel module only have one way: &g...
2013 Apr 29
0
[LLVMdev] A new mechanism to compiler kernel modules using llvm: Defer type evaluation in clang?
Just out of curiosity, what would be the main benefit of this approach vs DKMS which is already widely used ? Le 28 avr. 2013 à 18:42, Jovi Zhang <bookjovi at gmail.com> a écrit : > Hi, > > First of all, I didn't study on compiler too much, I'm a Linux kernel developer, > Now I have one idea about compile kernel module by using llvm framework. > > In Linux world, traditionally compile Linux kernel module only have one w...
2013 Apr 28
7
[LLVMdev] A new mechanism to compiler kernel modules using llvm: Defer type evaluation in clang?
Hi, First of all, I didn't study on compiler too much, I'm a Linux kernel developer, Now I have one idea about compile kernel module by using llvm framework. In Linux world, traditionally compile Linux kernel module only have one way: compile it to machine code directly, deploy to target machine, then run it in target machine. This have some problem from long term view, especially
2013 Mar 18
0
[linux-linus test] 17325: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass
...@googlemail.com> Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org> Joshua Zhu <zhu.wen-jie@hp.com> Josselin Costanzi <josselin.costanzi@mobile-devices.fr> Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> Jouni Malinen <jouni@qca.qualcomm.com> Jovi Zhang <boojovi@gmail.com> Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com> Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hi> Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu> Jozsef Marton <jmarton@users.sourceforge.net> João Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@openbossa.org> JP Abgrall <jpa@google.com> Juan Gutierrez <jgutierrez@ti.co...
2013 Mar 29
0
[linux-linus test] 17454: regressions - FAIL
...@googlemail.com> Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org> Joshua Zhu <zhu.wen-jie@hp.com> Josselin Costanzi <josselin.costanzi@mobile-devices.fr> Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> Jouni Malinen <jouni@qca.qualcomm.com> Jovi Zhang <boojovi@gmail.com> Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com> Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hi> Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu> Jozsef Marton <jmarton@users.sourceforge.net> João Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@openbossa.org> JP Abgrall <jpa@google.com> Juan Gutierrez <jgutierrez@ti.co...
2013 Apr 10
0
[linux-linus test] 17612: regressions - FAIL
...@googlemail.com> Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org> Joshua Zhu <zhu.wen-jie@hp.com> Josselin Costanzi <josselin.costanzi@mobile-devices.fr> Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> Jouni Malinen <jouni@qca.qualcomm.com> Jovi Zhang <boojovi@gmail.com> Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com> Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hi> Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu> Jozsef Marton <jmarton@users.sourceforge.net> João Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@openbossa.org> JP Abgrall <jpa@google.com> Juan Gutierrez <jgutierrez@ti.co...
2013 May 05
0
[linux-linus test] 17901: regressions - FAIL
...@googlemail.com> Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org> Joshua Zhu <zhu.wen-jie@hp.com> Josselin Costanzi <josselin.costanzi@mobile-devices.fr> Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> Jouni Malinen <jouni@qca.qualcomm.com> Jovi Zhang <boojovi@gmail.com> Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com> Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hi> Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu> Jozsef Marton <jmarton@users.sourceforge.net> João Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@openbossa.org> JP Abgrall <jpa@google.com> Juan Gutierrez <jgutierrez@ti.co...
2013 May 07
0
[linux-linus test] 17916: regressions - FAIL
...@googlemail.com> Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org> Joshua Zhu <zhu.wen-jie@hp.com> Josselin Costanzi <josselin.costanzi@mobile-devices.fr> Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> Jouni Malinen <jouni@qca.qualcomm.com> Jovi Zhang <boojovi@gmail.com> Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com> Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hi> Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu> Jozsef Marton <jmarton@users.sourceforge.net> João Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@openbossa.org> JP Abgrall <jpa@google.com> Juan Gutierrez <jgutierrez@ti.co...
2013 Jun 16
0
[linux-linus test] 18150: regressions - FAIL
...@googlemail.com> Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org> Joshua Zhu <zhu.wen-jie@hp.com> Josselin Costanzi <josselin.costanzi@mobile-devices.fr> Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> Jouni Malinen <jouni@qca.qualcomm.com> Jovi Zhang <boojovi@gmail.com> Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com> joyce <xuejiufei@huawei.com> Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hi> Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu> Jozsef Marton <jmarton@users.sourceforge.net> João Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@openbossa.org> JP Abgrall <jpa@google.com>...
2013 Jun 23
0
[linux-linus test] 18181: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass
...@googlemail.com> Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org> Joshua Zhu <zhu.wen-jie@hp.com> Josselin Costanzi <josselin.costanzi@mobile-devices.fr> Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> Jouni Malinen <jouni@qca.qualcomm.com> Jovi Zhang <boojovi@gmail.com> Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com> joyce <xuejiufei@huawei.com> Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hi> Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu> Jozsef Marton <jmarton@users.sourceforge.net> João Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@openbossa.org> JP Abgrall <jpa@google.com>...
2013 Aug 29
0
[linux-linus test] 18805: regressions - FAIL
...@googlemail.com> Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org> Joshua Zhu <zhu.wen-jie@hp.com> Josselin Costanzi <josselin.costanzi@mobile-devices.fr> Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> Jouni Malinen <jouni@qca.qualcomm.com> Jovi Zhang <boojovi@gmail.com> Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com> joyce <xuejiufei@huawei.com> Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hi> Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu> Jozsef Marton <jmarton@users.sourceforge.net> João Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@openbossa.org> JP Abgrall <jpa@google.com>...
2013 Aug 29
0
[linux-linus test] 18844: regressions - FAIL
...@googlemail.com> Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org> Joshua Zhu <zhu.wen-jie@hp.com> Josselin Costanzi <josselin.costanzi@mobile-devices.fr> Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> Jouni Malinen <jouni@qca.qualcomm.com> Jovi Zhang <boojovi@gmail.com> Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com> joyce <xuejiufei@huawei.com> Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hi> Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu> Jozsef Marton <jmarton@users.sourceforge.net> João Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@openbossa.org> JP Abgrall <jpa@google.com>...
2013 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] A new mechanism to compiler kernel modules using llvm: Defer type evaluation in clang?
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 4:13 PM, James Courtier-Dutton <james.dutton at gmail.com> wrote: > Jovi, > > The problem with kernel module binary compatibility is that if you > fixed the kernel module binary API, it will stifle innovation within > the kernel. > So, to the kernel developers, a changing module API is a bonus feature > and not an issue. I expect you will have no
2013 Apr 29
0
[LLVMdev] A new mechanism to compiler kernel modules using llvm: Defer type evaluation in clang?
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:40 PM, James Courtier-Dutton <james.dutton at gmail.com> wrote: > I am not sure this would work. It might be able to handle changes in > structure, but what about changes in the accessor functions? function change is not a big deal, take a example, one function referenced in ko, but not exist in new kernel, how could we replace new kernel in this case? This
2013 May 03
4
[LLVMdev] link native code compiled by llvm and gcc?
Hi, Is it possible to link native codes generated by different compiler? the usecase could be: Linux kernel compiled by gcc want to load kernel module compiled by Clang (I know there have some problem to compile kernel by Clang currently, but ignore those problem in here) I just concern about the call conversion problem, and compatibility between gcc and clang. Thanks .jovi
2013 Apr 29
0
[LLVMdev] A new mechanism to compiler kernel modules using llvm: Defer type evaluation in clang?
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18 at gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/29/2013 7:32 AM, Jovi Zhang wrote: >> >> The case I really want to solve is some kernel change cause ko must need >> to recompile, like data structure field offset changed in new kernel, this >> will make offset mismatch between new kernel and old ko. This is the reason
2013 Apr 29
3
[LLVMdev] A new mechanism to compiler kernel modules using llvm: Defer type evaluation in clang?
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas <devlists at shadowlab.org> wrote: > Just out of curiosity, what would be the main benefit of this approach vs DKMS which is already widely used ? > Thanks Dupas. I checked DKMS you mentioned, basically DKMS is just a ko and its sources management tool. It's not easy to deploy ko source into target machine, and it's more
2013 Apr 30
2
[LLVMdev] A new mechanism to compiler kernel modules using llvm: Defer type evaluation in clang?
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:31 AM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote: > On 4/28/13 11:42 AM, Jovi Zhang wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> First of all, I didn't study on compiler too much, I'm a Linux kernel >> developer, >> Now I have one idea about compile kernel module by using llvm framework. >> >> In Linux world, traditionally