search for: boogi

Dear all, Recently I've considering using LIT for my benchmark testing framework, and the only reference for LLVM-LIT is the man page and some READMEs. I don't find any documentations on config, which seems to be quite important to the tool. If I use lit outside LLVM source tree and use on my own test files, LIT marks them as 'unresolved'. So are there any documentations I can

...2]: S-1-1-0 SID[ 3]: S-1-5-2 SID[ 4]: S-1-5-11 SID[ 5]: S-1-5-21-1214440339-839522115-1708537768-2254 SID[ 6]: S-1-5-21-1214440339-839522115-1708537768-513 SID[ 7]: S-1-5-21-1214440339-839522115-1708537768-2270 SID[ 8]: S-1-5-32-545 SE_PRIV 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 [root@chrome boogie]$ wbinfo -s S-1-5-21-1214440339-839522115-1708537768-6280 MELAD\tac 2 [root@chrome boogie]$ wbinfo -s S-1-5-21-1214440339-839522115-1708537768-2270 MELAD\melsa 2 [root@chrome boogie]$ wbinfo -s S-1-5-21-1214440339-839522115-1708537768-2254 MELAD\MELSAApps 2 [root@chrome boogie]$ wbinfo -s S-1-...

Hi, So, SMACK is a software verifier based around LLVM, and you can find more info (PDF, title, abstract) about our recent publication here: http://soarlab.org/2014/05/smack-decoupling-source-language-details-from-verifier-implementations/ I would appreciate if you could add it to your list of LLVM-based publications. Thanks! Best, -- Zvonimir -- http://zvonimir.info http://soarlab.org/

Hello everybody, I saw Guus already had contact with Jason over email. What do you guys tinc of wireguards, are there advantages? Jason seems to have a good grip of what he is talking about. https://fosdem.org/2017/schedule/event/wireguard/attachments/slides/1675/export/events/attachments/wireguard/slides/1675/wireguard_slides.pdf https://fosdem.org/2017/schedule/event/wireguard/ Kind

Thanks for the fast response John. On Thu, Oct 1, 2015, at 04:51 PM, John Criswell wrote: > Dear Ed, > > First, someone has updated the DSA code in the poolalloc project to LLVM > 3.7, and a Master's student worked for me over the summer to update a > large chunk of SAFECode to LLVM 3.7. However, the update to LLVM 3.7 > isn't finished (we need to finish integrating

Hello, all, My name is Scott Santucci and I'm a software developer kicking around various wild ideas. (I wish I had something more interesting to say about myself than that, but nothing comes to mind; my day job is in SQL and Java, nothing to do with LLVM.) I am wondering whether anyone has tried using LLVM to apply formal verification to program code. I'm thinking about trying to

...u prepare each customer''s request also asks true even take you and leave happy with the mouse         download  see    (Jumping-Bananas (919.1 Kb    You little monkey you jump over the trees to collect the banana by arrows and space button            download   see        (Jungle-Boogie (391.4 Kb   You Mowgli the jungle boy and a friend of the animals you need to climb ladders and tree branches to collect mangoes and bananas that catch you without any of the animals or falling in a hole and take them back to you and jump by arrows and space button            download  see    ...

...mentation was not the most efficient (it >>exec()'ed the Omega solver for every query). A better approach today >>would be to integrate the constraint solver into the compiler proper. >>Additionally, you now have other tools available, such as CVC4, Z3, and >>SMACK/Boogie, for building and solving the constraints. > >We had already noticed that the limit to linear array access was way >behind state of the art (we have a lot of experience with constraint >solvers). Using an SMT solver would make sense, as you can use the >theory that suits the particu...

Hi. I rewrote the patch according to the comments. I adopted generating in-place code because it looks the quickest way. The point Eddie wanted to discuss is how to generate code and its ABI. i.e. in-place generating v.s. direct jump v.s. indirect function call Indirect function call doesn't make sense because ivt.S is compiled multi times. And it is up to pv instances to choose in-place

Hi. I rewrote the patch according to the comments. I adopted generating in-place code because it looks the quickest way. The point Eddie wanted to discuss is how to generate code and its ABI. i.e. in-place generating v.s. direct jump v.s. indirect function call Indirect function call doesn't make sense because ivt.S is compiled multi times. And it is up to pv instances to choose in-place

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================== "Life is trying things to see if they work." Ray Bradbury ============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is a bug fix release of the Samba 3.2 series. Major bug fixes included in Samba 3.2.2 are: o

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================== "Life is trying things to see if they work." Ray Bradbury ============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is a bug fix release of the Samba 3.2 series. Major bug fixes included in Samba 3.2.2 are: o

A month or two ago I sent an email to this list proposing to expand the list of "standard" tags for Ogg Vorbis. No tag would be required, but if you wanted to encode certain types of information about a file, you could use a standard tag. I went through the whole discussion, and revised my proposal in light of all the comments from everyone. Here is the updated proposal. This

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Now all the comments so far have been addressed, but only a few exceptions. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops.

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Now all the comments so far have been addressed, but only a few exceptions. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops.

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Please review and comments. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops. Currently only ia64/xen pv_ops implementation

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Please review and comments. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops. Currently only ia64/xen pv_ops implementation

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Changes from take 5 are rebased to Linux 2.6.26-rc3, bug fix ivt.S paravirtualization and multi entry point support. I believe these patches can be applied to the linux ia64 repository. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Changes from take 5 are rebased to Linux 2.6.26-rc3, bug fix ivt.S paravirtualization and multi entry point support. I believe these patches can be applied to the linux ia64 repository. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops

Hi. The patch I send before was too large so that it was dropped from the maling list. I'm sending again with smaller size. This patch set is the xen paravirtualization of hand written assenbly code. And I expect that much clean up is necessary before merge. We really need the feed back before starting actual clean up as Eddie already said before. Eddie discussed how to clean up and suggested