Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "bond_gw".
Did you mean:
bind_pw
2016 Jul 07
2
NetworkManger creates extra bonds; is this a bug?
...r monitoring scripts.
I'm wondering why a second bond is created? Is it a bug in NetworkManger?
#Create a bond with two slaves
nmcli con add autoconnect no type bond con-name bond0 ifname bond0
nmcli con mod bond0 ipv6.method ignore ipv4.method manual ipv4.addresses
${BOND_IP}/${BOND_CIDR} ${BOND_GW} ${BOND_DNS} ${BOND_DNS_SEARCH}
ipv4.never-default no ipv4.ignore-auto-dns no
nmcli con add autoconnect no type bond-slave con-name bond-slave-eth0
ifname eth0 master bond0
nmcli con add autoconnect no type bond-slave con-name bond-slave-eth1
ifname eth1 master bond0
#Enable bond
nmcli con mod bon...
2016 Jul 07
2
NetworkManger creates extra bonds; is this a bug?
...bond is created? Is it a bug in NetworkManger?
>>
>>
>> #Create a bond with two slaves
>> nmcli con add autoconnect no type bond con-name bond0 ifname bond0
>> nmcli con mod bond0 ipv6.method ignore ipv4.method manual ipv4.addresses
>> ${BOND_IP}/${BOND_CIDR} ${BOND_GW} ${BOND_DNS} ${BOND_DNS_SEARCH}
>> ipv4.never-default no ipv4.ignore-auto-dns no
>> nmcli con add autoconnect no type bond-slave con-name bond-slave-eth0
>> ifname eth0 master bond0
>> nmcli con add autoconnect no type bond-slave con-name bond-slave-eth1
>> ifname eth1...
2016 Jul 07
0
NetworkManger creates extra bonds; is this a bug?
...wondering why a second bond is created? Is it a bug in NetworkManger?
>
>
> #Create a bond with two slaves
> nmcli con add autoconnect no type bond con-name bond0 ifname bond0
> nmcli con mod bond0 ipv6.method ignore ipv4.method manual ipv4.addresses
> ${BOND_IP}/${BOND_CIDR} ${BOND_GW} ${BOND_DNS} ${BOND_DNS_SEARCH}
> ipv4.never-default no ipv4.ignore-auto-dns no
> nmcli con add autoconnect no type bond-slave con-name bond-slave-eth0
> ifname eth0 master bond0
> nmcli con add autoconnect no type bond-slave con-name bond-slave-eth1
> ifname eth1 master bond0
>...
2016 Jul 11
0
NetworkManger creates extra bonds; is this a bug?
...etworkManger?
> >>
> >>
> >> #Create a bond with two slaves
> >> nmcli con add autoconnect no type bond con-name bond0 ifname bond0
> >> nmcli con mod bond0 ipv6.method ignore ipv4.method manual
> ipv4.addresses
> >> ${BOND_IP}/${BOND_CIDR} ${BOND_GW} ${BOND_DNS} ${BOND_DNS_SEARCH}
> >> ipv4.never-default no ipv4.ignore-auto-dns no
> >> nmcli con add autoconnect no type bond-slave con-name bond-slave-eth0
> >> ifname eth0 master bond0
> >> nmcli con add autoconnect no type bond-slave con-name bond-slave-eth1...