search for: bommel

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 5:10 PM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote: > On 2/28/11 10:04 AM, Frits van Bommel wrote: >> I don't think a full clone is necessary, since he wants to replace the >> function. He only needs to create the new function and splice in the >> body of the old one. > > That is exactly what MakeFunctionClone() does.  It creates a new function > and uses Cl...

On 2009-05-18 20:06, Frits van Bommel wrote: > Xerxes Rånby wrote: > >> Frits van Bommel skrev: >> >>> Benjamin Kramer wrote: >>> >>>> The attached patch modifies the llvm build system (both autotools and >>>> cmake) to write the revision into PACKAGE_VERSION:...

Frits van Bommel skrev: > Benjamin Kramer wrote: > >> At the moment llvm-config outputs "2.6svn" if llvm is build from trunk >> >> $ llvm-config --version >> 2.6svn >> >> Some external projects (built out-of-tree) need to know which revision >> of llvm i...

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Frits van Bommel <fvbommel at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:26 PM, BernardH > <gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel at bernard-hugueney.org> wrote: >> Should I consider NoFolder unsupported ? > > Seeing as it's completely broken (it doesn't insert the created > in...

Xerxes Rånby wrote: > Frits van Bommel skrev: >> Benjamin Kramer wrote: >>> The attached patch modifies the llvm build system (both autotools and >>> cmake) to write the revision into PACKAGE_VERSION: >>> >>> $ llvm-config --version >>> 2.6-71981 >>> >> I don't...

2011/2/28 John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu>: > On 2/28/11 6:31 AM, Gabriel Rodríguez wrote: > > Hi all, > > I am trying to extend a FunctionType to include new parameters. In > particular, I want to > ensure that the main function has been declared with both argsc and argsv. > However > there seems to be no easy way to accomplish this: >

On 02/01/2011 06:43 PM, Frits van Bommel wrote: > I don't think that's always possible. > For example: if a phi in the successor has a phi in the predecessor as > one of it's incoming values, then the predecessor cases have to be > merged into the successor phi. However, if they share a predecessor > but have di...

Thank you very much guys, I really appreciate your help. George On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Frits van Bommel <fvbommel at gmail.com>wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:57 PM, George Baah <georgebaah at gmail.com> wrote: > > I did M.getOrInsertFunction and called the exit function with . > > > > IRBuilder<> builder = IRBuilder<>(...); > > > > Value *...

...e *one = ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt32Ty(M.getContext()),1); builder.CreateCall(exitF,one,"tmp4"); "Instruction has a name, but provides a void value! %tmp4 = call void @exit(i32 1) Broken module found, compilation aborted! " On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Frits van Bommel <fvbommel at gmail.com>wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:31 PM, George Baah <georgebaah at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Joshua, > > I have a function foo and I want to insert exit(0) at the end of > foo. > > The problem is M.getFunction returns null, which is...

On 1 December 2010 11:11, Frits van Bommel <fvbommel at gmail.com> wrote: > Those are destructor calls for the case where none of the foo()s > throw. There are no ctor calls because the classes have trivial > constructors, which are no-ops. Indeed! Thanks! ;) > If there were also catches, they'd probably need to exp...

Török Edwin wrote: > I think you don't need to support all trunk revisions. > People using trunk could be told to either update to a certain revision, > or stick to a released version. We don't support /all/ trunk revisions, but we don't like to force upgrades unless it's really needed so we try to at least support most recent revisions. One of the reasons is that not

On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> wrote: > On Dec 26, 2010, at 8:38 AM, Lu Mitnick wrote: >> $diff configure configure.bak >> >> 1394c1394 >> <   --enable-optimized      Compile with optimizations enabled (default is YES) >> --- >> >   --enable-optimized      Compile with optimizations enabled (default is

On Monday 18 May 2009 13:35, Frits van Bommel wrote: > Török Edwin wrote: > > I think you don't need to support all trunk revisions. > > People using trunk could be told to either update to a certain revision, > > or stick to a released version. > > We don't support /all/ trunk revisions, but we don't lik...

On 2/28/11 10:04 AM, Frits van Bommel wrote: > 2011/2/28 John Criswell<criswell at illinois.edu>: >> On 2/28/11 6:31 AM, Gabriel Rodríguez wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I am trying to extend a FunctionType to include new parameters. In >> particular, I want to >> ensure that the main func...

Benjamin Kramer wrote: > At the moment llvm-config outputs "2.6svn" if llvm is build from trunk > > $ llvm-config --version > 2.6svn > > Some external projects (built out-of-tree) need to know which revision > of llvm is installed. LDC currently asks llvm-config --src-root for the > source directory and then parses svn info's output to get the revision

If you remove all the 'static's from the member functions, it'd work more like IRBuilder. It would also allow you to take the LLVMContext& as a constructor parameter, so that methods like this: On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: >   /// GetStruct - return a constant struct given a context and a vector >   /// of elements. >   static

On 04/03/2011 12:43 AM, Frits van Bommel wrote: > On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Yiannis Tsiouris > <yiannis.tsiouris at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I am not sure i made myself clear about what i want. I was wondering >> if there >> is a way to communicate to LLVM's register allocator and define which...

At the moment llvm-config outputs "2.6svn" if llvm is build from trunk $ llvm-config --version 2.6svn Some external projects (built out-of-tree) need to know which revision of llvm is installed. LDC currently asks llvm-config --src-root for the source directory and then parses svn info's output to get the revision number. This requires the user to keep the llvm source tree

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org> wrote: > On 1 December 2010 09:46, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: >> Nor these. Basically, I want the basic block that's labeled a "landing pad" to be jumped to by only a dispatch resume or unwind edge of invoke. We could do this with the c.dtor and ch.int here, but it would

...ed with the debug information? How can I set the line number information for the instructions? Abhirup Ghosh M. Tech Department of Computer Science & Engg. IIT, Bombay email - abhirupju at gmail.com , abhirup at cse.iitb.ac.in Contact - 9920735181 On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Frits van Bommel <fvbommel at gmail.com>wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Abhirup Ghosh <abhirupju at gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > I am new to LLVM infrastructure. Recently I am trying to set the > debug > > info for an instruction. The main aim is to set the...