search for: bolk

Linux Samba 3.0.12 + acl (ext3) =============================== When upgrading from 3.0.11 to 3.0.12 ACL's do not seem get used anymore. We are using the inherit acls options for both maps and files. After the upgrade users are unable to create new files in directories where they used to have privileges for. The error returned is: "The file already exists. Do you want to

...ted - I have cross subnet browsing working (and thus wins). And I do have a samba box on both ends. The behaviour I noted happens irregularly: sometimes I can open a share on the other subnet, but mostly I cannot not. I'll still have a look at your suggestions though, it might help. Regards, Bolke > I suspect your problem is, netbios *broadcasts* simply don't traverse an > IPSec tunnel... OpenVPN is likely a different story, but I never had > any luck with this unless I set up a Samba box on both ends that > maintained browse lists on both sides. > > There are plenty...

...y modifies file A user x cannot modify file A anymore Permissions for user X are being set to read-only. Note: In our case the user (X) is actually able to change the permissions and to write to the file again. It would greatly appreciated if someone know a solution to this problem. regards, Bolke de Bruin Solaris ACLs - Files Becoming Read Only --------------------------------------- Problem: -------- Since we have upgraded to Microsoft Office 2003 from Microsoft Office 2000 we have had problems with files becoming Read Only. Background: ----------- We have read-only and write...

I much regret in many ways having to ask this question below. But our business needs now demand more than we think we can deliver using open source software exclusively. What is the best way to 'suck up' all of the domain group and user data from a current samba 3.0.21a PDC into a microsoft windows 2003 server? We have two basic needs that demand we now introduce active directory servers

Hi all! This is a repost to this list, hoping to draw some extra attention because I got NO reply whatsoever to the original posting :( I would really appreciate if someone could comment om which of both strategies as described below is best. I am having some trouble with a samba domain distributed over 2 subnets (192.168.0.0/23 (supernetted) & 192.168.4.0/24). These subnets are

Sparc Solaris / UFS file system. I have some ACL's set up for a handful of users and its all worked flawlessly with every incarnation of Samba I've used over the past couple years, which would be most. Last Friday evening I upgraded from 3.0.11 to 3.0.13 and some of the users I have some ACL's set up for promptly found Monday that they couldn't save new Excel files, they'd be

Hi Peter, is your patch against script.aculo.us mentioned in [1] gone any further in the last 3 months? -- alberto [1] http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/2585 On 22/ago/06, at 00:35, Peter Michaux wrote: > > On 8/21/06, Bill Lazar <blazar-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: >> >> Before pounding my head on this particular rock I want to ask if >>