search for: bogons

As far as I can tell from <http://shorewall.net/errata.htm> the current shorewall bogons file is <http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/errata/2.0.8/bogons> which contains the line: 58.0.0.0/7 logdrop # Reserved This is incorrect. These two /8s were allocated to APNIC as of April 2004. See also <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=nanog&m=108319003517919&w=2> and the...

hi: Just a litle update: 41/8 allocated to AfriNIC (APR 2005). 73/8 allocated to ARIN (MAR 2005). hope it helps.

Hi, according to: http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space the bogons table is outdated... tha attached patch fixes that... (done against 2.0.1) -- Regards Thomas PS. please CC me as I''m not subscribed to the list -------------- next part -------------- --- usr/share/shorewall/bogons.old 2004-04-19 18:28:00.000000000 +0300 +++ usr/share/shorewall/bogons...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 An updated bogons file is available at: http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/errata/2.0.8/bogons ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/errata/2.0.8/bogons Thanks to Lorenzo Martignoni for bringing the resent IANA allocations to my attention. - -Tom - -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The initial file that I uploaded was incorrect. If you downloaded a file that still contains 72.0.0.0/8 then please download again. Sorry for the confusion. An updated bogons file is available at: http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/errata/2.0.8/bogons ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/errata/2.0.8/bogons Thanks to Lorenzo Martignoni for bringing the resent IANA allocations to my attention. - -Tom - -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented...

Updated rfc1918 and bogons files are now available: rfc1918 for Shorewall 2.0.0 and earlier: http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/errata/1.4.10/rfc1918 bogons for Shorwall 2.0.1: http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/errata/2.0.1/bogons Thanks go to Thomas Backlund for pointing out that the file was out of date. -Tom -- To...

...ecent allocations by the IANA, the following files are available: For Shorewall 2.0.0b and earlier: http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/errata/1.4.10/rfc1918 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/errata/1.4.10/rfc1918 For Shorewall 2.0.1 and later: http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/errata/2.0.10/bogons ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/errata/2.0.10/bogons - -Tom - -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key -----BEGIN PGP SIGNA...

...9;s my shorewall configuration: Hosts #ZONE HOST(S) OPTIONS loc br0:eth1 road br0:tap+ #LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES BEFORE THIS LINE -- DO NOT REMOVE Interfaces #ZONE INTERFACE BROADCAST OPTIONS GATEWAY net eth0 10.0.0.255 nobogons,routefilter,logmartians,tcpflags,arp_filter,nosmurfs #loc eth1 detect - br0 detect # #LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES BEFORE THIS ONE -- DO NOT REMOVE Masq eth0 192.168.3.0/24 Policy #SOURCE DEST POLICY LOG LIMIT:BURST # LEVEL...

I just started service with Broadvoice.com and everything seems to work. However, apparently my understanding of incoming sip contexts is less then what I thought it was. Could someone point me in the right direction? (* on a public address, CVS-HEAD-07/12/04, C7960 phones) In my sip.conf I have: [general] port = 5060 bindaddr = 0.0.0.0 allow=ulaw tos=0x18 ;sets ip tos bits (=lowdelay and

Hi folks, Has anyone tested the changes to multiple ISPs/load balancing or routestopped in 2.4.0-RC1 yet? We need to talk about what criteria we will use for determining whether 2.4.0 is ready for release. I''ve started configuring a firewall at work with the multiple ISPs support, but its kernel doesn''t have connection marking support, so it''s going to be a couple of

Sorry if this is somewhat offtopic, but I''m interested in knowing how many on the list either manage or have dealt with networks in the following address blocks that have been recently assigned by ARIN: 58.0.0.0/24 59.0.0.0/24 69.0.0.0/24 through 72.0.0.0/24 82.0.0.0/24 through 88.0.0.0/24 We have recently changed ISPs and ended up with an address block in the 72.x space, which is

> -----Original Messages----- > From: "Steven Tardy" <sjt5atra at gmail.com> > Sent Time: 2018-02-26 10:48:48 (Monday) > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> > Cc: > Subject: Re: [CentOS] How to update modules in iniramfs fastly > > On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 8:29 PM wuzhouhui <wuzhouhui14 at mails.ucas.ac.cn> > wrote:

Hi, I''ve a little problem, I hope so.. First a hint, I haven''t a static IP - Adress and so I used a dyndns Provider. In DMZ runs a sftp server. It should accessible from net. My router is forwarding the traffic from port 22 to the machine in DMZ. Now, in basic installation I have rfc1918-dropping configured by net interface. My problem: If rfc1918 dropping is on I

...* 80.53.44.254 0.0.0.0/0 0 0 LOG all -- * * 83.17.56.60 0.0.0.0/0 LOG flags 0 level 6 prefix `Shorewall:blacklst:DROP:'' 0 0 DROP all -- * * 83.17.56.60 0.0.0.0/0 Chain bogons (32 references) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 0 0 LOG all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 LOG flags 0 level 7 prefix `Shorewall:bogons:DROP:'' 0 0 DROP all -- * *...

Hi all, Any one tried installing Asterisk on Linksys WRT54G? We have but facing problems with SIP to SIP calls. The phones ring and calls are established but we cannot hear any voice at all. I tried allow=all in the general section but did not work. So I forced ulaw. Can any one please check it out and let me know what is wrong? Here are the conf files: Asterisk Version: Asterisk

Is my RFC1918 file obsolete? I have been assigned an ip in the 83.0.0.0/8 range, and of cource a lot of Shorewall systems drop me with a RFC1918 error. So, is my ISP actually giving me a RFC1918 IP, or am I missing something? .

Hi ;) I'm a french newbie and i installed asterisk 1 day ago. I've got an ATA186 and a computer with Sjphone installed. If i want to call the sjphone from the ata or call the ata from de sjphone everything is ok. My problem is ,that i can't call the voicemail or any other phone number ..as 600 for exemple from the ata or the jphone. I don't know why but i looked after a long

Hi, I configured asterisk on redhat linux 9 box. I installed two different ip softphones (SJPHONE and X-PRO) and got them registered with asterisk. The call from one phone to another does get routed via asterisk, but there is one problem coming up. As soon as call is accepted by the end user , it is automatically disconnected with the error "cannot align media streams". If I enable SIP

I have searched all over the web and have not really found anything related to this error.... The only thing I found is related to a system stops responding on DTMF, which does not happen here... THe following is the output from the CLI: *CLI> 2004-08-09 17:36:29 DEBUG[229390]: chan_sip.c:2332 sip_alloc: Allocating new SIP call for 640E2D47-E98B11D8-8FDBE54A-5FB5A0CB@65.67.76.30

Can someone offer a hint on what I'm doing wrong with the basic * config? Just implemented * for the first time using yesterday's cvs. The initial configs are based on John Todd's article at http://www.onlamp.com/lpt/a/3956, and using two 7960's for initial testing. When one 7960 calls the other, I get the following and the call is dropped: -- Executing