search for: bogdan_barto

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "bogdan_barto".

Did you mean: bogdan_bartos
2015 May 12
3
Secondary DC as fileserver within VirtualBox
Hi, I setup a secondary DC to server as a fileserver for testing purposes. The DC (DCBACKUP) in question runs on top of a Fedora 21 x64 with VirtualBox. The DC OS also runs Fedora 21 x64. The smb.conf follows: [global] workgroup = BPDNET realm = ad.blackpenguin.org netbios name = DCBACKUP server role = active directory domain controller vfs objects = acl_xattr map acl inherit = Yes store
2015 May 12
1
Secondary DC as fileserver within VirtualBox
...4 > 72076 T?bingen > Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499 > eMail: mueller at tropenklinik.de > Internet: www.tropenklinik.de > > > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Im > Auftrag von bogdan_bartos > Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Mai 2015 05:03 > An: samba at lists.samba.org > Betreff: [Samba] Secondary DC as fileserver within VirtualBox > > Hi, > > I setup a secondary DC to server as a fileserver for testing purposes. The > DC (DCBACKUP) in question runs on top of a Fedora...
2013 Oct 12
1
Samba 4.1.0
I am using samba 4.1.0 on Fedora 19 x64. I compiled from source and provisioned from scratch. I joined the domain with a Windows 7 Pro x64 machine. I do see the shares on the server, but I do not have the security tab to set permissions on the folders. The unix filesystem rights are set to root:root to 770. I do not know what the problem is. I did not experience this issue on previous versions on
2013 Oct 16
1
Samba 4.1 - security tab missing - cannot grant security rights to folders
I am using samba 4.1.0 on Fedora 19 x64. I compiled from source and provisioned from scratch. I joined the domain with a Windows 7 Pro x64 machine. I do see the shares on the server, but I do not have the security tab to set permissions on the folders. The unix filesystem rights are set to root:root to 770. I do not know what the problem is. I did not experience this issue on previous versions on
2015 May 12
0
Secondary DC as fileserver within VirtualBox
...Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus Paul-Lechler-Str. 24 72076 T?bingen Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499 eMail: mueller at tropenklinik.de Internet: www.tropenklinik.de -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Im Auftrag von bogdan_bartos Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Mai 2015 05:03 An: samba at lists.samba.org Betreff: [Samba] Secondary DC as fileserver within VirtualBox Hi, I setup a secondary DC to server as a fileserver for testing purposes. The DC (DCBACKUP) in question runs on top of a Fedora 21 x64 with VirtualBox. The DC OS als...
2015 May 12
1
Secondary DC as fileserver within VirtualBox
...4 > 72076 T?bingen > Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499 > eMail: mueller at tropenklinik.de > Internet: www.tropenklinik.de > > > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Im > Auftrag von bogdan_bartos > Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Mai 2015 05:03 > An: samba at lists.samba.org > Betreff: [Samba] Secondary DC as fileserver within VirtualBox > > Hi, > > I setup a secondary DC to server as a fileserver for testing purposes. The > DC (DCBACKUP) in question runs on top of a Fedora...
2014 May 30
0
Folders/files losing security access
Hi all, I have been experiecing this issue since the first release of samba 4.0. I am running samba 4.1.7 in a production environment for about 25 people - higher the user/work volume, the more frequent the security access loss. Every once in a while a user calls me to report that he cannot write/delete or modify certain files or folders. The only fix that I can apply (this also worked in samba
2014 Apr 14
1
Samba 4.1.6 huge security flaw
Hi all, I've been running Samba 4.1.6 in production for 2 weeks now and it's been great. However I noticed a huge security flaw today that I hit only once. I access Samba4 shares over the VPN that is irrelevant since the security access is user-based, not IP based. What happens right after the connection, Windows tries to read the shares and some are empty, but they are not supposed to