search for: boettcher

...ing version 2.3.7.1. Using the Azure-AD as passdb already works. In this context I noticed that the scope implementation is not yet merged. Since I haven't found any hints for an OAuth2 userdb implementation yet, I wanted to ask if there are any plans for an implementation. Greetings Lennart Boettcher -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20190814/4fd3d7f1/attachment.html>

Hi! Dovecot supports Lua userdb, which can be used to implement custom user databases, maybe this might work for you? See https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/authentication/lua_based_authentication for more details. Aki > On 15/08/2019 12:16 Lennart Boettcher <lennart.boettcher at secpoint.onmicrosoft.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > Thank you for the quick reply. > > > > > > I have expressed myself wrongly. Our idea was to use the Azure-AD as userdb by doing the user lookup with the help of Microsoft'...

...roduct: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: a.boettcher at gmail.com QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Created attachment 116968 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=116968&action=edit dmesg of full boot + setting external display to mode with 297 MHz clock Starting from stock linux 4.1.0 source, libdrm 2.4.61, xf86-v...

Below is some C code and its LLVM translation (using a recent rev). The compiler goes ahead and loads from x in main, but it seems clear that a constant propagation pass could have inferred that x is 0. In fact that is what happens if x is static, but in this case I cannot see how external linkage of x would invalidate that optimization. This is one of those optimizations that would not be

...another file which defines x as extern? It can only be sure, when x is declared static. So, for me the LLVM-code is right. (I even remember someone, that it is platform specific whether x is initialized to 0 or not... or was it a question of C89 or C99?) regards, Patrick. -- Mail: patrick.boettcher at desy.de WWW: http://www.wi-bw.tfh-wildau.de/~pboettch/

...r-idea, but I'm learning fast ;). So, let me ask, before adding anything to this class myself, is it a) the correct way to add the basic-block-stuff to this class? b) has someone already done something in that direction which is can be shared? :) best regards, Patrick. -- Mail: patrick.boettcher at desy.de WWW: http://www.wi-bw.tfh-wildau.de/~pboettch/

...th dovecot against such an ldap-directory? After reading docs and comments in the config-file, I think no, but I am not sure. As I read the source, it is not possible just now, but would be, if I could use %d in the searchbase. Or did I understand something wrong? TIA Timo Boettcher

Hi, in section B.29. (Write State Register Instructions) of 'The SPARC Architecture Manual Version 8' it is said that the "The write state register instructions are delayed-write instructions." The Y-register is a state-register. Furthermore in the B.29-secion there is a programming note saying: MULScc, RDY, SDIV, SDIVcc, UDIV, and UDIVcc implicitly read the Y register.

...r-idea, but I'm learning fast ;). So, let me ask, before adding anything to this class myself, is it a) the correct way to add the basic-block-stuff to this class? b) has someone already done something in that direction which is can be shared? :) best regards, Patrick. -- Mail: patrick.boettcher at desy.de WWW: http://www.wi-bw.tfh-wildau.de/~pboettch/

Fine by me :) On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jan 7, 2009, at 3:22 AM, Patrick Boettcher wrote: > > > Hi list, > > hi Talin, > > > > I'm working on a frontend to generate IR using the IRBuilder from > > LLVM. > > > > Now I want to add source-level-debuginfo and for that I would like > > to use the > > DebugInfoBuilder as it i...

...ine by me :) Is it ok to remove DebugInfoBuilder now? I don't think that anything in the tree is using it, what do you think Talin? -Chris > > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> > wrote: > > On Jan 7, 2009, at 3:22 AM, Patrick Boettcher wrote: > > > Hi list, > > hi Talin, > > > > I'm working on a frontend to generate IR using the IRBuilder from > > LLVM. > > > > Now I want to add source-level-debuginfo and for that I would like > > to use the > > DebugInfoBuilder as it i...

On Jan 7, 2009, at 3:22 AM, Patrick Boettcher wrote: > Hi list, > hi Talin, > > I'm working on a frontend to generate IR using the IRBuilder from > LLVM. > > Now I want to add source-level-debuginfo and for that I would like > to use the > DebugInfoBuilder as it is taking some of the burderns. Unfortunately...

...another file which defines x as extern? It can only be sure, when x is declared static. So, for me the LLVM-code is right. (I even remember someone, that it is platform specific whether x is initialized to 0 or not... or was it a question of C89 or C99?) regards, Patrick. -- Mail: patrick.boettcher at desy.de WWW: http://www.wi-bw.tfh-wildau.de/~pboettch/

...n another file which defines x as extern? It can only be sure, when x is declared static. So, for me the LLVM-code is right. (I even remember someone, that it is platform specific whether x is initialized to 0 or not... or was it a question of C89 or C99?) regards, Patrick. -- Mail: patrick.boettcher at desy.de WWW: http://www.wi-bw.tfh-wildau.de/~pboettch/

On Mar 7, 2009, at 10:54 AM, Patrick Boettcher wrote: > (I even remember someone, that it is platform specific whether x is > initialized to 0 or not... or was it a question of C89 or C99?) If that is the entire program, the value will be 0, and that is not platform specific, save the fact in ancient history there were buggy systems.

On Jan 19, 2009, at 11:01 AM, Patrick Boettcher wrote: > > >>> And more generally: Is the hazardRecognizer the right and only way >>> to >>> solve our NOOP-minimizing problem? >> >> Perhaps you want to do this after register allocation is done. Dan is >> developing the post-allocation schedule...

...anages? If the answer is "none", then it might be simpler to add new methods to IRBuilder rather than DebugInfoBuilder. If however there is additional context information that is shared between build operations, then it makes sense to let DebugInfoBuilder manage it. -- Talin Patrick Boettcher wrote: > Hi list, > hi Talin, > > I'm working on a frontend to generate IR using the IRBuilder from LLVM. > > Now I want to add source-level-debuginfo and for that I would like to > use the DebugInfoBuilder as it is taking some of the burderns. > Unfortunately it does...

Hi Patrick, I do not see a problem with those patches --- apart from missing tests ;) Cheers, Arnaud On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Patrick Boettcher via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi lists, > > Sorry for cross-posting, but these two patches are of concern to clang > and llvm. > > I'm compiling C-code which includes inline assembler which looks like > the following using the sparc-target: > &...

...to remove DebugInfoBuilder now? I don't think that anything in > the tree is using it, what do you think Talin? > > -Chris > > > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Jan 7, 2009, at 3:22 AM, Patrick Boettcher wrote: >> >> > Hi list, >> > hi Talin, >> > >> > I'm working on a frontend to generate IR using the IRBuilder from >> > LLVM. >> > >> > Now I want to add source-level-debuginfo and for that I would like >> > to use th...

Hi Evan, thanks for your response. On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Evan Cheng wrote: >> For example, code which looks like that: >> >> load 0x1234, reg1 >> noop >> noop >> add reg1, 1 >> load 0x1236, reg2 >> >> can be safely transformed to: >> >> load 0x1234, reg1 >> load 0x1236, reg2 >> noop >> add reg1, 1 >> >