search for: bnodes

Joyful. I'm adapting a FORTRAN 77 package for use with R. Pretty straightforward. Except for a glitch it took me some time to figure out. This existing package has subroutines which have parameters called "NA". So, I called subroutines like bnodes <- function(n, lst, lptr, lend, nodes, nb, na, nt) { ensure.all.numeric(list(n, lst, lptr, lend, nodes, nb, n.a, nt), "all arguments to -bnodes- must be numeric") out <- .Fortran("bnodes", N=as.integer(n), LIST=as.integer(lst), L...

Hi Patch "drm/nouveau: use drm_mm in preference to custom code doing the same thing" in nouveau tree introduced new deadlock possibility, for which lockdep complains loudly: [ 1541.070202] [drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: Allocating FIFO number 3 [ 1541.084772] [drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: nouveau_channel_alloc: initialised FIFO 3 [ 2417.733440] [drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0:

Hey on Centos 5 hfsplus.ko is part of the Kernel: kernel-2.6.18-238.12.1.el5.x86_64 : The Linux kernel (the core of the Linux operating system) Repo : installed Matched from: Filename : /lib/modules/2.6.18-238.12.1.el5/kernel/fs/hfsplus/hfsplus.ko doing a yum provides "*/hfsplus.ko" on CentOS 6 finds nothing. What happened to hfsplus.ko on Centos 6? Thanks, Jerry

Hi All- I have SuSE 8.2 installed on two different Intel machines, with (as far as I can determine) all required packages for doing what I'm trying to do here. Both machines suffer the same problems. I didn't find any SuSE 8.2 rpms, so I'm trying to build Samba 3.0 (stable) (24th Sep, 2003) on either of these machines but am having problems with it. As root, I did a

Hi all - Here''s my current error handling patchset, against 3.1-rc8. Almost all of this patchset is preparing for actual error handling. Before we start in on that work, I''m trying to reduce the surface we need to worry about. It turns out that there is a ton of code that returns an error code but never actually reports an error. The patchset has grown to 65 patches. 46 of them