search for: bmth

> With 3.3.5 my first test took 5 times to produce a non "bus > error" build. There were no 'make cleans' in between. > > What is going on? You mean you used your bsd-ports-provided gcc to compile LLVM and you've got 4 times a bus-error during the build? In this case, it cannot be a LLVM problem. In the linux-community, people say that bus-error's are

On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Edd Barrett <vext01 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Edd Barrett <vext01 at gmail.com> wrote: >> I am trying the same with gcc-4.2 now. > > The above results were infact with gcc-4.2. My apologies. With 3.3.5 my first test took 5 times to produce a non "bus error" build. There were no 'make

...I can not get a stack trace, as even with symbols enabled, the log tells me that it cannot make a core dump for this architecure. I can however get a "log level = 10" paste later today if needed. Is this a bug or a limitation in samba? Thanks -- Best Regards Edd http://students.dec.bmth.ac.uk/ebarrett

...1' to `long long Also we found that without specifying --enable-optimized, the optimisations were still present: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -Wall -W -Wwrite-strings -Wno-long-long -Wunused -Wno-unused-parameter -O3 :¬( -- Best Regards Edd http://students.dec.bmth.ac.uk/ebarrett