search for: bluescreening

Hi all, my system is a XEN3.4.1 Dom0 Host System with a HVM Windows 2008 R2 machine. After installation of the GPLPV driver ("gplpv_fre_wnet_AMD64_0.10.0.130.msi"), and an Reboot the Windows Server 2008 R2 comes up and ends in a bluescreen, and immediately restarts. Testsigning is ON. What else can be done, or better what needs to be checked? Is there somebody who is facing the same

Package: xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-amd64 Version: 3.2.1-2 Severity: important Tags: patch Hi, I'm having troubles with windows 2008 server with HVM on XEN. When I allocate more than one CPU to the Windows VM, windows crashes after a few minutes with a BSOD. Other people have this problem, too. The Exact error message (BSOD) is: (the unique lines) A clock interrupt was not received on a

I am currently running Centos 5.2 with 2.6.18-92.1.13.el5xen with 2 domu's One another Centos 5.2 and another Windows XP. The Centos DomU works fine and I never have any problems however my XP DomU crashes every so often with the bluescreen DRIVER_IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL then under the technical information tcpip.sys addres xxxxxx base at xxxxx datetime Xxxxxxxxx Is there a driver

So I successfully installed the GPLPV drivers in a Windows installation I have running under Xen. Turns out SP2 is needed - I wish this was slightly better documented somewhere, as the machine ended up bluescreening and I had to use /NOGPLPV to get it to boot again so I could upgrade it to SP2. My question is this: I ended up using ''disable'' in device manager for the rtl8139 and the old IDE driver as for some reason Windows still seems to be detecting that the devices are around. Windows was...

Package: xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-i386 Version: 3.2.1-2 Severity: important Hello, I'm having troubles with windows 2008 server with HVM on XEN. When I allocate more than one CPU to the Windows VM, windows crashes at boot. The Exact error message is: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor within the allocated time interval. STOP: 0x00000101

Hi everyone since I''m currently migrating from xm to xl and now are also a victim of the said error, I started researching on it and found that many people had the issue but not many found solution and behind this BSOD (=Bluescreen of Death), there are actually multiple errors in hiding. What I would like to do is gather as much info as possible in this thread to form a kind of

Hi Everyone, I am trying my hands on xen under Solaris SXCE build 113. The machine has the following configuration: 2 Quad Core Xeon CPUs 16 GB RAM Solaris SXCE b113 4 disks - 2 mirrors x 2 stripes under ZFS The problem is that xen HVM is very slow. I am using the following command to create an Ubuntu 9.0.4 test vm. virt-install -n test1 -r 2048 --vcpus=2 -f /vdatapool/data/test1.img -s 50

I have a Win2K3 domU (and thankfully an image backup of the LVM volume that holds its system disk) I previously installed GPLPV v0.8.9 drivers, the domU boots OK with or without the /GPLPV switch in boot.ini, however with the /GPLPV switch it tries and fails to use the Xen network driver, and so the machine is network-less, so for the past few months I''ve left it using pure HVM

A few days ago I installed dovecot stable to replace uw-imap. The install went well and all boxes were converted ok. When accessing the new imap server though, certain operations seem much slower, in particular, moving mail between boxes is very slow, and I have received several complaints from users that the mail server has slowed down. I can't figure out what the slow point is as maildir

We recently upgraded our main file server from a PIII to a P4 with raid as well as did a fresh install of RedHat 9 leaving the old server intact. Most everything went well, I copied all the config files over for the different services and got samba running successfully. I tested connecting to from different win boxes using 98, 98SE, NT4, and 2K, they all were able to browse files and print

I'm planning on firewalling my samba server, i understand that the ports for samba are 137 139 445. Does anyone know if these are udp or tcp ports?

I have had the following problems both with the stock samba 2.2 server that comes with RedHat 9 and several releases of samba 3.0, currently it's at 3.0.14a. When logging on to Windows 2000 computers using the samba server as an NT domain controller, certain profiles seem to get permission errors and windows just sticks you with a temporary profile that changes everytime you log on. It seems

Hi! :o) I've got an Debian linux running on an Alpha machine.I had a Celeron II before, with Samba 2.2.6. I've made the change to Samba 3.0.0 and then I've just upgraded to 3.0.2a tonight. In the old smb.conf I've had a line "include = /etc/samba/configs/%U.conf" that was good in the old state, but with the new it doesn't work. I find out that the samba does not

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55450 Priority: medium Bug ID: 55450 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: nouveau driver fails to restore screen content / video mode after resume from s2ram QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified

On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Marc Muehlfeld <mmuehlfeld at samba.org> wrote: > Hello Andrew, > > Am 02.06.2015 um 09:55 schrieb Andrew Bartlett: >> Just checking if anybody has Samba's classic DC functioning with Windows >> 10 domain member clients? In particular, I'm interested in any tests >> with git master or 4.2. >> >> I'm not

Hello, I've been consistently attempting to make the setup mentioned in the subject work on the following hardware: Xeon E3 1275 (v1, Sandy Bridge) Asus P8B WS (Firmware: 0904 and 2009) 16 GB RAM Sapphire Radeon HD 7950 OC (Firmware: 015.013.000.010.000705) Linux 3.4.1 dom0, x86-64, pvops. Xen 4.1.2 (+ security patch) and 4.1.3-rc1. Old qemu-dm setup. (not new mainline qemu) Windows 7 64-bit

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > close 522060 Bug #522060 [src:xen] xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-amd64: xen hvm Windows Bluescreen - clock interrupt was not recevied onasecondary processor within the allocated time interval Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 522060:

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > close 535150 Bug #535150 [src:xen] xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-i386: xen hvm Windows Bluescreen Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 535150: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=535150 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems

Hello Scott, Am 04.06.2015 um 08:47 schrieb Scott Lovenberg: > Marc, I'm assuming your test was a clean Samba install with stock > configurations and a clean Windows-10 9926 (with no previous contact > to either AD or NT4 domains)? Yes. It was a new installed Windows 10 TP build 9926, with no contact to any AD or NT4 domain before. Also the Samba 4.2.1 PDC was a fresh installation

On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Marc Muehlfeld <mmuehlfeld at samba.org> wrote: > Hello Scott, > > Am 04.06.2015 um 08:47 schrieb Scott Lovenberg: >> Marc, I'm assuming your test was a clean Samba install with stock >> configurations and a clean Windows-10 9926 (with no previous contact >> to either AD or NT4 domains)? > > Yes. It was a new installed