search for: bludgeoning

x11-ssh-askpass version 1.2.0 (code name: Love Me Tender) is now available from the following locations: http://www.jmknoble.cx/software/x11-ssh-askpass/ http://www.ntrnet.net/~jmknoble/software/x11-ssh-askpass/ x11-ssh-askpass is a passphrase dialog for use with OpenSSH (www.openssh.com) under the X Window System. The important changes since version 1.2.0 are as follows: - Adds the

Greetings - I had a logical volume that was running out of space on a virtual machine. I successfully expanded the LV using lvextend, and lvdisplay shows that it has been expanded. Then I went to expand the filesystem to fill the new space (# resize2fs -p /dev/vde1) and I get the results that the filesystem is already xx blocks long, nothing to do. If I do a # df -h, I can see that the

Hi, (Forward from cfe-commits, where some backend stuff has come up). This is an issue I've been thinking about quite a bit recently, and I agree that the biggest problem is the one below: > * The big thing still missing here is that there is no logic to check how many VFP registers have already been used for other arguments. When deciding whether to pass an argument as a homogeneous

Hi all, I'd like to get added to the EditGroup for wiki.centos.org and perhaps projects.centos.org. I'm interested in adding content periodically throughout wiki.centos; most likely in the HOWTO areas, but am happy to do reorganization and cleanup as-needed. On the projects side I'd like to create a project for the i586 on CentOS 5 section. Thanks, Ray -- Ray Van Dolson <rayvd

...ns for keyed-only accounts: attempts are made to authenticate those accounts via password authentication before using keys. i'm not a coder so i don't have a fix, but i don't think it should be that hard to fix. any ideas? <EOF> ::[ RFC 2795 ]:: "Democracy means simply the bludgeoning of the people by the people for the people." -Oscar Wilde

...and tried both "UsePAM yes" and "UsePAM no" all to no avail. /var/log/faillog exists and it is owned by root and set to 600. these are redhat 7.3 and 9 systems. it displays the same behavior on both. any thoughts? <EOF> ::[ RFC 2795 ]:: "Democracy means simply the bludgeoning of the people by the people for the people." -Oscar Wilde

Hi all; I have a custom iproute2 table and a few rules to go along with it (CentOS 5) -- I have added the table to /etc/iproute2/rt_tables. if-up and friends doesn't seem to handle this real gracefully. How are those of you out there doing something similar managing this customization? I don't really want to muck with /etc/init.d/network or the if-up scripts to avoid breaking upgrades.

> Subject: Re: [CentOS] xferlog not rotating. > To: centos at centos.org > Message-ID: <20110520144308.GA23319 at bludgeon.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:44:49AM -0400, Steven Crothers wrote: > > It's a bit funny that logrotate is difficult to fix for you... > > considering you have "System Engineer

Anyone know off the top of their heads if this (AT-2972SX) fiber network card will work out of the box with CentOS 6.x? Sounds like it's a Broadcom-based card, so perhaps it will, or maybe something exists for it in elrepo? Hoping to avoid needing to build custom drivers from source. Ray

OK, here is some code that may be of use to someone: http://www.progsoc.uts.edu.au/~telford/samples/R/gafit_0.1.tar.gz Hopefully it might make contrib status on CRAN :-) It uses a genetic algorithm to seek the lowest value of some user-defined target function (or seeks the most negative value if negative values are possible). By using a sum of squared residuals for the target function, it

...resses changed to protect the guilty :) I'm using a Grandstream GXP2000 here, but a colleague is using a Snom and sees the same thing as I do. (I'm remote from the LAN, colleague is on the same LAN, but I don't think that has anything to do with it) So is this some artifact of mISDN bludgeoning it's way into the SIP stack and forcing caller ID to be unknown, or what? It's asterisk 1.2.26.1 if this makes any difference at this point. Latest mISDN drivers as far as I'm aware. If I call into the system on a SIP or IAX trunk, then it "just works". (and does the righ...

On 4/7/20 1:54 PM, John Garry wrote: > On 06/04/2020 10:05, Hannes Reinecke wrote: >> On 3/11/20 7:22 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 09:08:56PM +0000, John Garry wrote: >>>> On 10/03/2020 18:32, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 12:25:28AM +0800, John Garry wrote: >>>>>> From: Hannes

Greetings. I am trying to create a 10TB (approx) ext3 filesystem. I am able to successfully create the partition using parted, but when I try to use mkfs.ext3, I get an error stating there is an 8TB limit for ext3 filesystems. I looked at the specs for 5 on the "upstream" vendor's website, and they indicate that there is a 16TB limit on ext3. Has anyone been able to create

Hi Tim, > So I've come to the conclusion that the real flaw is LLVM > not exposing enough information to the target-dependent > backend code for it to do the right thing. We also had this problem. You might find this patch useful as a starting point: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2012-March/048266.html /Patrik Hägglund -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces

Hi Everybody, My problem is that nlminb doesn't converge, in minimising a logLikelihood function, with 31*6 parameters(2 weibull parameters+29 regressors repeated 6 times). I use nlminb like this : res1<-nlminb(vect, V, lower=c(rep(0.01, 12), rep(0.01, 3), rep(-Inf, n-15)), upper=c(rep(Inf, 12), rep(0.99, 3), rep(Inf, n-15)), control = list(maxit=1000) ) and that's the result :

Hello, Is there a way to compare the relative relevance of fixed and random effects in mixed models? I have in mind measures of effect size in ANOVAs, and would like to obtain similar information with mixed models. Are there information criteria that allow to compare the relevance of each of the effects in a mixed model to the overall fit? Thank you, Bruno

V4 of the patch, incorporating Bastian's suggestions. Jon --- xen/debian/patches/series | 1 + xen/debian/patches/tools-ocaml-fix-build.diff | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ xen/debian/rules | 5 ++ xen/debian/rules.real | 39 ++++++++++++ xen/debian/templates/control.main.in | 16 +++++

I have a question that has been puzzling me for some time ... what is the reason RedHat chose to go with btrfs rather than working with the ZFS-on-Linux folks (now OpenZFS)? Is it a licensing issue, political, etc? Although btrfs is making progress, ZFS is far more mature, has a few more stable features (especially Raid-z3) and has worked flawlessly for me on CentOS-6 and Scientific Linux-6.

Does anyone know how to submit wishes to the EPEL Wishlist here? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/WishList It reads "Immutable Page". They say: "Please add packages that are part of Fedora but lack a EPEL maintainer to this list", but there is no way to do that! They don't say if "Packages part of Fedora" means "Core" or it can be Extras too, but

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15350 Summary: randr12: VGA-0 always reported as "disconnected" Product: xorg Version: git Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org