search for: blocknrs

Hello. On a server running 2.4.25, I have the two following errors in the kernel logfile: Unexpected dirty buffer encountered at do_get_write_access:618 (08:11 blocknr 920707) Unexpected dirty buffer encountered at do_get_write_access:618 (08:11 blocknr 920707) Should I worry about them (disk failure, filesystem damage) ? Thanks. As an addition what does the pair '08:11' means ? Is

On my Debian box: Package: lilo Version: 1:22.2-5 Severity: normal lilo seems to cause a kernel warning (see subject) when / is a ext3 partition. Maybe a kernel problem? Who knows. I'm running 2.4.19-rc1-ac7 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux hummus 2.4.19-rc1-ac7 #1 Wed Jul 17 22:14:20 CEST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions

...ly = >defined once. Yes, I'm sure. I wrote the Pass and the RegisterPass also in a .cpp file, like this: #include<vector> #include"llvm/Pass.h" #include"llvm/Function.h" #include"llvm/BasicBlock.h" #include"llvm/Instruction.h" #include"../blockNrs/blockNrs.h" #include"GenomManager.h" using namespace std; using namespace llvm; namespace { class FunctionAnalysis : public FunctionPass { public: static char ID; FunctionAnalysis() : FunctionPass((intptr_t)&ID) {} // Konstruktor ruft Funktionsdurchlauf auf ~Fun...

It's both in 2.6 and recent 2.6 (for RH ASS2.1 you'll probably need to copy the latest 2.4 defintion, but I don't care for obsolete junk). Index: src/super.c =================================================================== --- src/super.c (revision 1014) +++ src/super.c (working copy) @@ -799,7 +799,7 @@ /* get first two blocks */ for (i=0; i<2; i++) { - bhs[i] = getblk

I've been running into a kernel panic pretty consistently when using data=journal. This occurs during heavy IO, and is highly reproducible (only takes about 5 minutes of IO to cause it). The applications being used are MySQL, Postfix, and a mail filtering application which operates on postfix queue files using mmaped IO. Shortly before the crash, the following messages are logged: Mar

This patch contains the following possible cleanups: - make needlessly global functions static - journal.c: remove the unused global function __journal_internal_check and move the check to journal_init - remove the following write-only global variable: - journal.c: current_journal - remove the following unneeded EXPORT_SYMBOL's: - journal.c: journal_check_used_features -

Hello ext3-users-request, request ======= 2004-03-03 12:00:00 You writed======= >Send Ext3-users mailing list submissions to > ext3-users at redhat.com > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > ext3-users-request at redhat.com >

The following 6 patches cleanup the jbd code and kill about 200 lines. First of 4 patches can apply to 2.6.13-git8 and 2.6.13-mm2. The rest of them can apply to 2.6.13-mm2. fs/jbd/checkpoint.c | 179 +++++++++++-------------------------------- fs/jbd/commit.c | 101 ++++++++++-------------- fs/jbd/journal.c | 11 +- fs/jbd/revoke.c | 158

This patch contains the following cleanups: - make needlessly global functions static - journal.c: remove the unused global function __journal_internal_check and move the check to journal_init - remove the following write-only global variable: - journal.c: current_journal - remove the following unneeded EXPORT_SYMBOL: - journal.c: journal_recover Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk

Hello, I am not subscribed to this mailing list. My apologies if non-members are not allowed to post in this forum. I have a Linux-2.4.19pre10aa4 computer and I have seen an error message "Unexpected dirty buffer encountered at do_get_write_access:598 (03:05 blocknr 0)" appears in the log. With a little bit of research I found that this message is printed from fs/jbd/journal.c,

Hi!! This is my first time with llvm. I'm still learning and really need help. I wrote only one Function Pass, which uses another Function Pass (blockNrs), and registered this: RegisterPass<FunctionAnalysis> X("gasched", "Genom Scheduling Pass"); When I compile my sourcecode, everything was okay. But when I tried to test it, i got this error Message: nicole at fpga3:~/test$ make opt -load /iss/fpga3/nicole/llvm-2.2/Debug...

This patch contains the following possible cleanups: - make needlessly global functions static - #if 0 the following unused global functions: - journal.c: __journal_internal_check - journal.c: journal_ack_err - remove the following write-only global variable: - journal.c: current_journal - remove the following unneeded EXPORT_SYMBOL's: - journal.c: journal_check_used_features -

Hi!! This is my first time with llvm. I'm still learning and really need help. I wrote only one Function Pass, which uses another Function Pass (blockNrs), and registered this: RegisterPass<FunctionAnalysis> X("gasched", "Genom Scheduling Pass"); When I compile my sourcecode, everything was okay. But when I tried to test it, i got this error Message: nicole at fpga3:~/test$ make opt -load /iss/fpga3/nicole/llvm-2.2/Debug...

Hi Stephen, I found a bug in JBD routine journal_create() in kernel 2.6, when I debug the OCFS v2 driver. mark_buffer_dirty() reports buffer_head is not uptodate. See following bug description. ------------------------------------------------------- OS: Linux Kernel 2.6.1 Plarform: IA32 Steps: 1. Build the ocfs v2 driver under kernel 2.6. 2. insert ocfs2.ko into kernel 2.6. 3. mkfs.ocfs2 -F

Hi everyone, So this question is more for people who are familiar with the internals of ext3. I notice that the function journal_init_dev() sets the value journal->j_blk_offset = start This means that start can be any arbitrary block number on the device. However, later in the function journal_bmap() it is never actually used. The value of *retp in journal_bmap() is set to *retp =

Hi, Michael I have met ext4 error when using vhost_scsi on arm64 platform, and suspect it is vhost_scsi issue. Ext4 error when testing virtio_scsi & vhost_scsi No issue: 1. virtio_scsi, ext4 2. vhost_scsi & virtio_scsi, ext2 3. Instead of vhost, also tried loopback and no problem. Using loopback, host can use the new block device, while vhost is used by guest (qemu).

Hi, Michael I have met ext4 error when using vhost_scsi on arm64 platform, and suspect it is vhost_scsi issue. Ext4 error when testing virtio_scsi & vhost_scsi No issue: 1. virtio_scsi, ext4 2. vhost_scsi & virtio_scsi, ext2 3. Instead of vhost, also tried loopback and no problem. Using loopback, host can use the new block device, while vhost is used by guest (qemu).

No material changes are made. --- Makefile | 10 +- convert.c => convert/convert.c | 803 +--------------------------------------- convert/convert.h | 76 ++++ convert/ext2.c | 791 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 873 insertions(+), 807 deletions(-) rename convert.c => convert/convert.c (74%) create mode

This version fixes three bugs in the 2nd patch of this series that caused kernel BUG when the system was under race. We weren't accounting with t_oustanding_credits correctly, and there were race conditions caused by the fact the I had overlooked the fact that __jbd2_log_wait_for_space() and jbd2_get_transaction() requires j_state_lock to be write locked. Theodore Ts'o (3): jbd2: Use

V1->V2: -Changed dio_end_io to EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL -Removed the own_submit blockdev dio helper -Removed the boundary change V2->V3 -Made it so we keep track of what the current logical offset in the file we have a BIO setup for so we can pass it into the submit_io hook. Because BTRFS can do RAID and such, we need our own submit hook so we can setup the bio''s in the correct fashion,