search for: blocklists

Perhaps someone can help me understand why this is happening. I''m trying to write a script using ''shorewall iprange'' to parse some ip ranges into subnets so that i can place them into the blocklist. I keep getting an error when i run the script though. Here is the script: #!/bin/csh foreach i (`cat ipranges`) shorewall iprange $i >>

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1726 Bug ID: 1726 Summary: invalid json generated by ipset list -output json Product: ipset Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 Component: default Assignee:

On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, mj wrote: > What we do is: use https://github.com/trick77/ipset-blacklist to block IPs > (from various existing blacklists) at the iptables level using an ipset. "www.blocklist.de" is a nifty source. Could you suggest other publically available blacklists? > That way, the known bad IPs never even talk to dovecot, but are dropped > immediately. We

...GRUB2 on centos 5.2 system, I get following error. centos5: grub-install /dev/sda //sbin/grub-setup: warn: This GPT partition label has no BIOS Boot Partition; embedding won't be possible!. //sbin/grub-setup: warn: Embedding is not possible. GRUB can only be installed in this setup by using blocklists. However, blocklists are UNRELIABLE and their use is discouraged.. //sbin/grub-setup: error: will not proceed with blocklists. Can you please help me figure out the problem ? Thanks Sachin

...r a suitable penalty period. >> You can also use a third party RBL that specialized in brute forcers like >> blocklist.de. You can also feed back fail2ban data and crowdsource BFD >> data to them. > > Yes, I will look into that now. > ... > > Anyone aware of other blocklists that are worth bocking? Because the > list.blocklist.de/lists/all.txt blocks some, but not anywhere near all. There are other RBLs that overlap with this (like CBL), but they include entries will produce false positives. There was OpenBL but that is defunct. The different lists at blocklist.d...

Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > Hi Edward, > Hello. > I saw your mail on btrfs ml with the grub patches and the notes > how to deal with btrfs. > > can you explain how grub and btrfs work exactly? > I read the grub manual at > http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/html_node/Bootstrap- > tricks.html#Bootstrap-tricks > > so I wonder: does btrfs provide a

Hi Robert, On 07/18/2017 11:43 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote: > i guess not, but typical bots arent using ssl, check it > > however fail2ban sometimes is to slow I have configured dovecot with auth_failure_delay = 10 secs I hope that before the 10 sec are over, dovecot will have logged about the failed login attempt, and fail2ban will have blocked the ip by then. MJ

I did not see any way, during the CentOS7 install, to install the CentOS7 boot loader into the /boot partition rather than to the MBR of a drive. How does one do this in the installation of CentOS7 ?

Dear All Please be informed that I tried to install the "Real VMX" application on my Cent OS client . I setup the environment variables and build kernel . Then I add the following entry to my /boot/grub/menu.lst : title Real VMX rootnoverify (hd0,0) kernel -type=netbsd /vmx I tried to reboot my Cent OS client and at the boot loader when I select "Real VMX" I got the

I've recently switched to using spamassassin via a sendmail milter, rather than using procmail to invoke it. This means that I get a number of messages appearing in my maillog, and then being reported by logwatch as unmatched entries. An example of such a messages is: Feb 27 04:33:09 quail sendmail[24780]: p1R4X46P024780[2]: URIBL blacklist\n\t* [URIs: tablettoxicspillsrx.ru]\n\t* 1.5

On Thu, 4 Dec 2014, Gene Cumm wrote: > Ady has an excellent point. Try the following instead: > > LABEL test > MENU LABEL test > COM32 pxechn.c32 > APPEND pxebsd.0 Thanks, that works! How do I use that in the generic case? The ?pxebsd.0? file can be called as? ? PXE loader ? COMBOOT (16-bit) ? DOS .COM ? Multiboot (although it switches back to 16-bit mode

--- lib/hivex.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/hivex.c b/lib/hivex.c index efc27f8..e3c1e05 100644 --- a/lib/hivex.c +++ b/lib/hivex.c @@ -208,6 +208,19 @@ struct ntreg_sk_record { char sec_desc[1]; /* security info follows */ } __attribute__((__packed__)); +struct

I've been running sendmail since the beginning of my online time. 1. Did I see that postfix can run sendmail milters? 2. If so, did I read that postfix can run these separately for inbound vs. outbound? 3. Can it run like a rbl blacklist on inbound and not outbound? 4. If the above is true, does this require separate configurations of postfix or is it already set to allow this out of the

* Richard W.M. Jones: > diff --git a/lib/hivex.c b/lib/hivex.c > index e3c1e05..9351ac5 100644 > --- a/lib/hivex.c > +++ b/lib/hivex.c > @@ -1471,7 +1471,7 @@ hivex_value_value (hive_h *h, hive_value_h value, > if (h->msglvl >= 2) > fprintf (stderr, "hivex_value_value: warning: big data block is not " > "valid

Hi, First I would like to say Shorewall rocks! I have a suggestion for a Port based Block List that would complement the present "blacklist". Would it be a good idea to have a port specific block list e.g. "smtpblocklist" that Shorewall would check incoming traffic against based on the specific port e.g. 25. This way you can have a huge protocol specific block list that

I was wondering if i could stick a certain ip in the blocklist, but at the same time have an allow rule for http in the rules section. In other words i would like to block pretty much all access from a certain internet address except for http from the internal network. So does the rules file get parsed before the blacklist in the firewall to make this possible?

Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 22:45:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Seymour <jseymour@LinxNet.com> Reply-To: postfix-users@postfix.org To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: Stop Using relays.osirusoft.com *NOW*! jseymour@LinxNet.com

None of my Centos 5 boxen can show flash since the update this morning. Am I alone or do other people have this issue ?? Centos 7 boxes work properly. I haven't looked at RHEL 6 boxes yet. Although I miss using flash on these boxes, it IS a great security upgrade....

On Tue, 18 Jul 2017, dovecot-request at dovecot.org wrote: > Thanks for the quick follow-ups! Much appreciated. After posting this, I > immediately started working on fail2ban. And between my initial posting > and now, fail2ban already blocked 114 IPs. > > I have fail2ban with maxretry=1 and bantime=1800 > > However, it seems almost all IPs are different, and I don't

Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I've had a few messages sent to the list bounce. Looks like the centos > mail server IP is blacklisted. Here's the error: > > Hi. This is the qmail-send program at yahoo.com. > I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following > addresses. > This is a permanent error; I've given up.