search for: blockheader

.../ /* this is a header for each allocated block of space which tracks the refcount, * and when the ref count is 0, it is linked into a list of scheduled deletions. */ typedef struct Header { unsigned flags; /* book-keeping info */ union { unsigned count; struct Header *next; } field; } BlockHeader; /* flag indicates the union contains a pointer */ #define POINTER_FLAG 0x01 #define IS_POINTER(header) (header->flags & POINTER_FLAG) #define SET_POINTER(header) header->flags |= POINTER_FLAG; #define CLEAR_POINTER(header) header->flags &= ~POINTER_FLAG; #define LINK(root, block...

Again, sorry for the delay. :( On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Sandro Magi wrote: > I've written a reference-counting garbage collector for LLVM, but I'm > still unclear on a few things. Cool! > The following piece of code that appears on > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/GarbageCollection.html is unclear: > > ;; As the pointer goes out of scope, store a null value into > ;;

>From the little I have heard about control systems for cars, which was some years ago, they were blockhead proprietary. The analogy would only work if computing was customarily blackbox technology, which it isn't. I'd be surprised if there were any branded flash drives that contained less than their advertised amount of storage. That leaves the question of what is going on under the

Hello, i have written this little function to draw different normal distributions: n.Plot <- function(x,my,sigma) { e <- exp(1) names(x) <- x f.x <- (1/(sigma*sqrt(2*pi)))*e^(-1*(((x-my)^2)/2*(sigma^2))) plot(f.x,type="l",xlim=c(-5,5)) return(f.x) } if i define x like this: x <- seq(-5,5,0.01) Now n.Plot(x,0,1) DOES draw the correct plot, but the x-axis is labeled

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:56:17AM +0100, Mark Ballard wrote: > > This is incredible, Mr Sandeen. You mean USB flash manufacturers > (what's their body - the USB Implementer's Forum?) have simply not > provided a means for software to query the underlying hardware in a > USB flash? Have software producers asked them for this? No, they haven't. And yes we have, since

Hi, This email is mainly addressed at Waldi (Bastian Blank). I'm resending it since the previous one is waiting for approval due to its size being bigger than 40k (I compressed the .diff this time, so it should be ok). I have worked on enhancing the current packaging of Xen 4.1.1 over the last weeks. The main goal was to package the OCaml libraries of Xen as separated binary packages, and