search for: blockchain

Hi, there! I?m Suzana Joel from Lumos Labs. I?d like to invite you to attend the Think with Terra Tech Talk - Back to Blockchain Basics, that?s scheduled to take place on *Monday, 5 October at 5:30 p.m. IST. * The Tech Talk will feature three sessions to help anyone get a working understanding of - - blockchain technology, - Smart Contracts, - Building on the Terra Blockchain Register: https://www.air...

...bug in here somewhere that is inf-looping. Just ran out of steam debugging it, will pick it back up again later today to shake it out. Maybe splicing a block into it current position will create a loop? Some random notes: - Please add a description of the algorithm. - Please add a comment to the BlockChain class. - Use a separate anonymous namespace per class, and don't indent for the namespace. +BlockChain *BlockPlacement2::CreateChain(MachineBasicBlock *BB) { + Chains.push_back(BlockChain(BlockToChain, BB)); + BlockToChain[BB] = &Chains.back(); + assert(ActiveChains.insert(&Chains.b...

...is barely maintainable given the lack of utilization targets in the upstream. The reason why I would like to again raise the matter is that we, the TON Labs team, would like to upstream our backend solution. The backend generates code for TON virtual machine designed to run smart contracts in TON blockchain (see the original specifications for TVM and TON respectively at <https://test.ton.org/tvm.pdf> https://test.ton.org/tvm.pdf and at <https://test.ton.org/tblkch.pdf> https://test.ton.org/tblkch.pdf). The target has the following key particularities: - stack-based virtual machine...

...After building out project in release mode, caught an assertion, which we have not seen before: hello_f: /tmp/rpmbuild_debug/BUILD/llvm/build/include/llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h:126: void llvm::DenseMap<KeyT, ValueT, KeyInfoT>::clear() [with KeyT = llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, ValueT = <unnamed>::BlockChain*, KeyInfoT = llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::MachineBasicBlock*>]: Assertion `NumEntries == 0 && "Node count imbalance!"' failed. Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. 0x00007ffff785c945 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 (gdb) bt #0 0x00007ffff785c945 in raise () from /li...

...One big caveat, I know I have an iteration bug in here somewhere that is inf-looping. Just ran out of steam debugging it, will pick it back up again later today to shake it out. > > Some random notes: > > - Please add a description of the algorithm. > - Please add a comment to the BlockChain class. > - Use a separate anonymous namespace per class, and don't indent for the namespace. > ... > Note that MachineFunction::iterator decays into an MBB pointer, so you can say FI->canFallThrough() and AnalyzeBranch(*FI...) > > + WeightedEdge WE = { BaseFrequency * M...

...ct in release mode, caught an assertion, which > we have not seen before: > > hello_f: /tmp/rpmbuild_debug/BUILD/llvm/build/include/llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h:126: > void llvm::DenseMap<KeyT, ValueT, KeyInfoT>::clear() [with KeyT = > llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, ValueT = <unnamed>::BlockChain*, KeyInfoT = > llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::MachineBasicBlock*>]: Assertion `NumEntries > == 0 && "Node count imbalance!"' failed. > > Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. > 0x00007ffff785c945 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 > (gdb) bt > #0 0x000...

...Pointers, Alias & ModRef Analyses - Point-Free Templates *Session 11 (Tuesday, 2:00-3:25PM, Bristol 2)* - Organising benchmarking LLVM-based compiler: Arm experience - Protecting the code: Control Flow Enforcement Technology *Session 12 (Tuesday, 4:30-5:15PM, Bristol 1 & 2)* - LLVM x Blockchains = A new Ecosystem of Decentralized Applications Thanks, Arnaud -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180409/0874f41f/attachment.html>

...caught an assertion, which >> we have not seen before: >> >> hello_f: /tmp/rpmbuild_debug/BUILD/llvm/build/include/llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h:126: >> void llvm::DenseMap<KeyT, ValueT, KeyInfoT>::clear() [with KeyT = >> llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, ValueT = <unnamed>::BlockChain*, KeyInfoT = >> llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::MachineBasicBlock*>]: Assertion `NumEntries >> == 0 && "Node count imbalance!"' failed. >> >> Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. >> 0x00007ffff785c945 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 >>...

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 3:24 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk>wrote: > >> >> On Oct 18, 2011, at 5:22 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: >> >> As for why it should be an IR pass, mostly because once the selection >>> dag runs through the code, we can never

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk>wrote: > > On Oct 18, 2011, at 5:22 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > As for why it should be an IR pass, mostly because once the selection dag >> runs through the code, we can never recover all of the freedom we have at >> the IR level. To start with, splicing MBBs around requires known about

...gt; > > - Please add a description of the algorithm. > There is more described now in various comments, but I'm going to work on an overview in the file comments. Not done yet, but wanted to get it back out for review in a more polished state. > > - Please add a comment to the BlockChain class. > Done. > > - Use a separate anonymous namespace per class, and don't indent for the > namespace. > Done. > > > ... > > Note that MachineFunction::iterator decays into an MBB pointer, so you > can say FI->canFallThrough() and AnalyzeBranch(*FI......

...> - Point-Free Templates > > *Session 11 (Tuesday, 2:00-3:25PM, Bristol 2)* > - Organising benchmarking LLVM-based compiler: Arm experience > - Protecting the code: Control Flow Enforcement Technology > > *Session 12 (Tuesday, 4:30-5:15PM, Bristol 1 & 2)* > - LLVM x Blockchains = A new Ecosystem of Decentralized Applications > > Thanks, > Arnaud >

Pete Biggs wrote: > >> We've been using pxeboot to pull up a menu, to build or rebuild >> machines for years. We have this new server, and it fails. Times out. >> What's happening is that it tries in this order >> .../pxelinux.cfg/b8945908-d6a6-41a9-611d-74a6ab80b83d >> .../pxelinux.cfg/01-88-99-aa-bb-cc-dd >> .../pxelinux.cfg/C0A8025B

David, just to clarify a misconception I might have introduced, we do not have linear memory in the sense that all data is stored as a trie. We do support arrays, structures and GEPs, however, as well as all relevant features in C by modeling memory. So regarding concepts of byte, all 5 statements you gave are true for our target. Either due to the specification or because of performance (gas

On 24/10/2019 14:21, JF Bastien via llvm-dev wrote: > I’d like to understand what programming model you see programmers using. > You don’t need 257 bits per byte if you only offer 257 bit integers. > Rather, bytes aren’t really a thing at that point. LLVM kinda handles iN > already, and your backend would legalize everything to exactly this type > and nothing else, right? Would

...f" to help people be smarter, happier, safer, and ... well, to do it yourselves so you're happy with it and get all the credit (lol). <http://callingketti.cf/lists/lt.php?id=YUgMAAZRGAFUXR1QWlQKVF0F> Over the course of the last few years new little additions have popped up, "/BLOCKCHAIN/" for instance connected to the great chain of Revelation 20:1 (which is already the other half of "the e <http://callingketti.cf/lists/lt.php?id=YUgNCAdSGAFUXR1QWlQKVF0F> lection is not to die bold" and the basic idea of building a better "overnet" ... a place where...

...become smarter and happier rather than ... "not ourselves." It is an emancipation, and it seems pretty clear that there's a tangible lack of desire on the ground here to "make the sword of Arthur" which is tied through these messages to the chain or Revelation 20:1 and the BLOCKCHAIN as well as another microcosm etched into my youth <http://bethesday.gq/lists/lt.php?id=YUgDBwdSGAFQXR1QWlQKVF0F> that this thing revolves around free speech and free thought and building a system of self-governance that utilizes available technologies to help self-governance. I'm not sure...

...s/lt.php?id=YUgMAA5VGAFSXB1QWlQKVF0F> voat <http://isiti.gq/lists/lt.php?id=YUgMAA5WGAFSXB1QWlQKVF0F> ; see "null vote" and how it connects to "empeopled <http://isiti.gq/lists/lt.php?id=YUgMAA5XGAFSXB1QWlQKVF0F> ." Creating a working prototype to show how "/*blockchain*/" is a divinely given name for a way to block the chain of censorship held in the hand of the angel of Revelation 20:1 is not a difficult task--it's fucking insane that nobody is calling or emailing me to work on that. I mean, it's "destiny" and "inevitable" that t...