Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "block_holder".
2009 Jan 04
3
[LLVMdev] RFA: TREE_READONLY in LLVM-GCC
...LLVM-GCC hackers!
I have a global variable that I want to mark as "TREE_READONLY" so
that it will become a "constant" in LLVM IR. This is for the new
blocks-related stuff, but that's not necessarily important for this
question. In particular, I want to mark the "block_holder" created in
"build_block_literal_tmp()" as read-only.
My question to you is: Considering that LLVM-GCC uses only a small
part of the GCC source base, what affect will marking the
"block_holder" variable as TREE_READONLY have? Does LLVM-GCC run
through code that loo...
2009 Jan 04
0
[LLVMdev] RFA: TREE_READONLY in LLVM-GCC
...>
> I have a global variable that I want to mark as "TREE_READONLY" so
> that it will become a "constant" in LLVM IR. This is for the new
> blocks-related stuff, but that's not necessarily important for this
> question. In particular, I want to mark the "block_holder" created in
> "build_block_literal_tmp()" as read-only.
>
> My question to you is: Considering that LLVM-GCC uses only a small
> part of the GCC source base, what affect will marking the
> "block_holder" variable as TREE_READONLY have? Does LLVM-GCC run
>...