search for: bloati

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 33 matches for "bloati".

Did you mean: bloat
2018 Oct 01
3
RFC: Adding a code size analysis tool
> On Oct 1, 2018, at 3:25 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 3:24 PM JF Bastien <jfbastien at apple.com <mailto:jfbastien at apple.com>> wrote: >> On Oct 1, 2018, at 3:16 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com <mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> (my vote, somewhat biased - is that
2018 Oct 01
4
RFC: Adding a code size analysis tool
> On Oct 1, 2018, at 3:16 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > (my vote, somewhat biased - is that I'd love to see more investment in Bloaty (to keep all these sort of size analysis tools and tricks in one place), but sort of accept folks are probably going to keep building more infrastructure for this sort of thing in LLVM directly) I get where that comes
2017 Jun 09
8
OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter
I am searching for the cheapeat *nix SOC device with ethernet and wifi that can run Python 2.7. Ethernet should be 100mbit and hopefully supporting PXE. OT because im doubting you can squeeze our bloaty friend onto such a device.... :)
2018 Sep 26
5
RFC: Adding a code size analysis tool
Hello, I worked on a code size analysis tool for a 'week of code' project and think that it might be useful enough to upstream. The tool is inspired by bloaty (https://github.com/google/bloaty), but tries to do more to attribute code size in actionable ways. For example, it can calculate how many bytes inlined instances of a function added to a binary. In its diff mode, it can show how
2007 Mar 26
3
proxy host specified as fqdn in userdb
Abstract from http://wiki.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase/ExtraFields/Proxy > > host=s: The destination server's *IP address*. This field is required. > Note that currently it's required to use an IP address since no DNS > resolving is done. > Hello Timo, Here goes one more item for the v2.0 wishlist: Will it become possible to do dovecot imap proxying based on a
2017 Jun 09
1
OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter
On 6/9/2017 12:44 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 09:00:42PM +0200, Andrew Holway wrote: >> I am searching for the cheapeat *nix SOC device with ethernet and wifi that >> can run Python 2.7. Ethernet should be 100mbit and hopefully supporting PXE. >> >> OT because im doubting you can squeeze our bloaty friend onto such a >> device....:) >
2007 May 23
6
Brainstorming - how to manage Shorewall rules
Shorewall (IP Tables frontend - www.shorewall.net) has been kind of a headache in trying to move forward with puppet - we just haven''t found a clean way to manage the "rules" file. With that in mind - would it be possible to create a "shorewall_rule" type? The rules file is a simple file with space/tab delimited fields: (I can provide a detailed explanation of each
2018 Mar 17
0
[cfe-dev] Clang executable sizes and build stats
Thanks for raising this. This is something we've recently been looking at too at Sony, as over the course of PS4's lifetime so far we've seen our clang executable on Windows approximately double in size, which isn't ideal for things like distributed build systems. A graph of clang.exe size on our internal staging branch matches yours closely with it being more of a death by a
2018 Mar 17
2
[cfe-dev] Clang executable sizes and build stats
I'm sure the x86 scheduler models are causing bloat. Every time a single instruction appears on a line by itself like this in a scheduler model: def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup2], (instregex "ANDNPDrr")>; It causes that instruction to be its own group in the generated output. And its replicated for each CPU. We should look into better using regular expressions or taking
2018 Mar 17
2
Clang executable sizes and build stats
Hi all, I recently did a run where I built clang executables on FreeBSD 12-CURRENT [1], from trunk r250000 (2015-10-11) all through r327700 (2018-03-16), with increments of 100 revisions. This is mainly meant as an archive, for easily doing bisections, but there are also some interesting statistics. From r250000 through r327700: * the total (stripped) executable size grew by approximately 43% *
2018 Mar 21
0
[cfe-dev] Clang executable sizes and build stats
> On Mar 17, 2018, at 4:04 PM, Craig Topper via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I'm sure the x86 scheduler models are causing bloat. Every time a single instruction appears on a line by itself like this in a scheduler model: > > def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup2], (instregex "ANDNPDrr")>; > > It causes that instruction to be its own
2018 Mar 22
1
[cfe-dev] Clang executable sizes and build stats
I just knocked ~400k off the size of the x86 scheduler tables by reducing from 5k+ entries to 2k+ entries per cpu. ~Craig On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 6:34 PM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 17, 2018, at 4:04 PM, Craig Topper via cfe-dev < > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I'm sure the x86 scheduler models are causing bloat. Every time
2017 Jun 09
0
OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 09:00:42PM +0200, Andrew Holway wrote: > I am searching for the cheapeat *nix SOC device with ethernet and wifi that > can run Python 2.7. Ethernet should be 100mbit and hopefully supporting PXE. > > OT because im doubting you can squeeze our bloaty friend onto such a > device.... :) Raspberry Pi 3B ???? 35 bucks notincluding power supply or SD card. the
2017 Jun 10
0
OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter
On 09/06/17 21:00, Andrew Holway wrote: > I am searching for the cheapeat *nix SOC device with ethernet and wifi that > can run Python 2.7. Ethernet should be 100mbit and hopefully supporting PXE. > > OT because im doubting you can squeeze our bloaty friend onto such a > device.... :) I would have answered "CentOS 7 on armhfp board" but your last requirement is the one
2017 Jun 11
0
OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter
I recommend the Cubieboards or Linkspirt. The advantage of both of these over a RaspberryPI: Mainline kernel. See what it takes for a special RPi kernel over on the Centos-arm list. Sata interface. What are you going to run your stuff on? A slow SD card or a slow USB drive? See my install howto over at: http://www.htt-consult.com/Centos7-armv7.html And in fact, I have a LinkSprite
2016 Apr 17
0
Anyone using coreos?
So I'm not running it on each individual container. Instead I'm running with a guarantee of at least one tinc container on each coreos host and then connect to other containers(currently have about 20 hosts running across the world with this setup) I find on the whole setup to work well, I'm not noticing any unusual overhead, but there is a lot of extra provisioning work I'm doing
2006 Nov 08
1
L4 probes..
Probably a special case here, but everytime the L4 probes the port, a line as added to the log. This gets a bit noisy. If a random IP connects, I'd want to see it, but maybe it would be nice to have the option to silence the log entry from certain hosts. For now I patch it locally, but without any .conf finesse. For example: Nov 8 10:55:24 corppop01 dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.info]
2016 Apr 17
2
Anyone using coreos?
I'd like to hear from anyone using coreos to run a container with tinc for purpose of connecting containers. Sounds almost like a chicken/egg problem:-) I'm thinking of running a container with alpine linux and tinc installed there. John Griessen
2009 Jul 15
2
USB phone with Asterisk under Linux
Hi all, I want to try to use a USB phone with Ekiga under Linux (Debian Lenny). It works: I can receive and make calls. But some buttons of USB phone don't work properly. In particular, button *, #, and hangup have wrong key mapping. Someone have tried a USB phone ???? Thamks all Marco -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2005 Aug 29
3
Directory server for Centos
Any ones knows if Fedora directory Server is available for Centos ia64. or is in progress to be. Or never is gona be available. Or Redhat Directory server? Thanks Este correo fue escaneado y se encuentra libre de virus. Este correo fue escaneado y se encuentra libre de virus. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: