search for: blk_queue_make_request

...gt; index 4efd69b..27e7175 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c > @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ static int axon_ram_probe(struct platform_device *device) > set_capacity(bank->disk, bank->size >> AXON_RAM_SECTOR_SHIFT); > blk_queue_make_request(bank->disk->queue, axon_ram_make_request); > blk_queue_logical_block_size(bank->disk->queue, AXON_RAM_SECTOR_SIZE); > - add_disk(bank->disk, true); > + add_disk(bank->disk, false); > > bank->irq_id = irq_of_parse_and_map(device->dev...

...gt; index 4efd69b..27e7175 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c > @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ static int axon_ram_probe(struct platform_device *device) > set_capacity(bank->disk, bank->size >> AXON_RAM_SECTOR_SHIFT); > blk_queue_make_request(bank->disk->queue, axon_ram_make_request); > blk_queue_logical_block_size(bank->disk->queue, AXON_RAM_SECTOR_SIZE); > - add_disk(bank->disk, true); > + add_disk(bank->disk, false); > > bank->irq_id = irq_of_parse_and_map(device->dev...

...xonram.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c index 4efd69b..27e7175 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ static int axon_ram_probe(struct platform_device *device) set_capacity(bank->disk, bank->size >> AXON_RAM_SECTOR_SHIFT); blk_queue_make_request(bank->disk->queue, axon_ram_make_request); blk_queue_logical_block_size(bank->disk->queue, AXON_RAM_SECTOR_SIZE); - add_disk(bank->disk, true); + add_disk(bank->disk, false); bank->irq_id = irq_of_parse_and_map(device->dev.of_node, 0); if (bank->irq_id == NO_IRQ)...

Hi, For virtio block device, actually there is no a hard limit for max request size, and virtio_blk driver set -1 to blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(q, -1U);. But it doesn't work, because there is a default upper limitation BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS (1280 sectors). So this series want to add a new helper blk_queue_max_hw_sectors_no_limit to set a proper max reqeust size. Weiping Zhang (2): blk-setting:

Hi, For virtio block device, actually there is no a hard limit for max request size, and virtio_blk driver set -1 to blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(q, -1U);. But it doesn't work, because there is a default upper limitation BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS (1280 sectors). So this series want to add a new helper blk_queue_max_hw_sectors_no_limit to set a proper max reqeust size. Weiping Zhang (2): blk-setting:

The race condition is noticed between disk_add() and disk attributes, on virtio-blk hotplug. Userspace listens to the KOBJ_ADD uevent generated in add_disk(). At that point we haven't created the serial attribute file, therefore depending on how fast udev reacts, the /dev/disk/by-id/ entry doesn't always get created. As pointed out by Christoph Hellwig in the specific fix [1], virtio-blk

The race condition is noticed between disk_add() and disk attributes, on virtio-blk hotplug. Userspace listens to the KOBJ_ADD uevent generated in add_disk(). At that point we haven't created the serial attribute file, therefore depending on how fast udev reacts, the /dev/disk/by-id/ entry doesn't always get created. As pointed out by Christoph Hellwig in the specific fix [1], virtio-blk

Hi, Jens & Rusty This version is rebased against linux-next which resolves the conflict with Paolo Bonzini's 'virtio-blk: allow toggling host cache between writeback and writethrough' patch. Patch 1/3 and 2/3 applies on linus's master as well. Since Rusty will pick up patch 3/3 so the changes to block core (adding blk_bio_map_sg()) will have a user. Jens, could you please

Hi, Jens & Rusty This version is rebased against linux-next which resolves the conflict with Paolo Bonzini's 'virtio-blk: allow toggling host cache between writeback and writethrough' patch. Patch 1/3 and 2/3 applies on linus's master as well. Since Rusty will pick up patch 3/3 so the changes to block core (adding blk_bio_map_sg()) will have a user. Jens, could you please

This patchset implements bio-based IO path for virito-blk to improve performance. Fio test shows it gives, 28%, 24%, 21%, 16% IOPS boost and 32%, 17%, 21%, 16% latency improvement for sequential read/write, random read/write respectively. Asias He (2): block: Add blk_bio_map_sg() helper virtio-blk: Add bio-based IO path for virtio-blk block/blk-merge.c | 63 ++++++++++++++

This patchset implements bio-based IO path for virito-blk to improve performance. Fio test shows it gives, 28%, 24%, 21%, 16% IOPS boost and 32%, 17%, 21%, 16% latency improvement for sequential read/write, random read/write respectively. Asias He (2): block: Add blk_bio_map_sg() helper virtio-blk: Add bio-based IO path for virtio-blk block/blk-merge.c | 63 ++++++++++++++

...p_rq_fn *prep_rq_fn; unprep_rq_fn *unprep_rq_fn; merge_bvec_fn *merge_bvec_fn; @@ -821,6 +823,7 @@ extern struct request_queue *blk_init_allocated_queue(struct request_queue *, request_fn_proc *, spinlock_t *); extern void blk_cleanup_queue(struct request_queue *); extern void blk_queue_make_request(struct request_queue *, make_request_fn *); +extern void blk_queue_abort_queue(struct request_queue *, abort_queue_fn *); extern void blk_queue_bounce_limit(struct request_queue *, u64); extern void blk_limits_max_hw_sectors(struct queue_limits *, unsigned int); extern void blk_queue_max_hw_sect...

...p_rq_fn *prep_rq_fn; unprep_rq_fn *unprep_rq_fn; merge_bvec_fn *merge_bvec_fn; @@ -821,6 +823,7 @@ extern struct request_queue *blk_init_allocated_queue(struct request_queue *, request_fn_proc *, spinlock_t *); extern void blk_cleanup_queue(struct request_queue *); extern void blk_queue_make_request(struct request_queue *, make_request_fn *); +extern void blk_queue_abort_queue(struct request_queue *, abort_queue_fn *); extern void blk_queue_bounce_limit(struct request_queue *, u64); extern void blk_limits_max_hw_sectors(struct queue_limits *, unsigned int); extern void blk_queue_max_hw_sect...

This patchset implements bio-based IO path for virito-blk to improve performance. Fio test shows bio-based IO path gives the following performance improvement: 1) Ramdisk device With bio-based IO path, sequential read/write, random read/write IOPS boost : 28%, 24%, 21%, 16% Latency improvement: 32%, 17%, 21%, 16% 2) Fusion IO device With bio-based IO path, sequential

This patchset implements bio-based IO path for virito-blk to improve performance. Fio test shows bio-based IO path gives the following performance improvement: 1) Ramdisk device With bio-based IO path, sequential read/write, random read/write IOPS boost : 28%, 24%, 21%, 16% Latency improvement: 32%, 17%, 21%, 16% 2) Fusion IO device With bio-based IO path, sequential

Hi, all This version reworked on REQ_FLUSH and REQ_FUA support as suggested by Christoph and dropped the block core bits since Jens has picked them up. Fio test shows bio-based IO path gives the following performance improvement: 1) Ramdisk device With bio-based IO path, sequential read/write, random read/write IOPS boost : 28%, 24%, 21%, 16% Latency improvement: 32%,

Hi, all This version reworked on REQ_FLUSH and REQ_FUA support as suggested by Christoph and dropped the block core bits since Jens has picked them up. Fio test shows bio-based IO path gives the following performance improvement: 1) Ramdisk device With bio-based IO path, sequential read/write, random read/write IOPS boost : 28%, 24%, 21%, 16% Latency improvement: 32%,

Hi, all Changes in v7: - Using vbr->flags to trace request type - Dropped unnecessary struct virtio_blk *vblk parameter - Reuse struct virtblk_req in bio done function - Added performance data on normal SATA device and the reason why make it optional Fio test shows bio-based IO path gives the following performance improvement: 1) Ramdisk device With bio-based IO path, sequential

Hi, all Changes in v7: - Using vbr->flags to trace request type - Dropped unnecessary struct virtio_blk *vblk parameter - Reuse struct virtblk_req in bio done function - Added performance data on normal SATA device and the reason why make it optional Fio test shows bio-based IO path gives the following performance improvement: 1) Ramdisk device With bio-based IO path, sequential

This patchset implements bio-based IO path for virito-blk to improve performance. Fio test shows it gives, 28%, 24%, 21%, 16% IOPS boost and 32%, 17%, 21%, 16% latency improvement for sequential read/write, random read/write respectively. Asias He (3): block: Introduce __blk_segment_map_sg() helper block: Add blk_bio_map_sg() helper virtio-blk: Add bio-based IO path for virtio-blk