search for: bldslv4

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "bldslv4".

2019 Jan 31
2
[RFC] migrating past C++11
...011/buildslaves (there's so many!). Some of them are down, I therefore have no idea what they run. Here are the bots that will definitely break, with their maintainers: > > Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> > am1i-slv1 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.3) 4.8.4 > as-bldslv4 -- Microsoft (R) Visual Studio (R) 2015 (14.0) > ps4-buildslave2 -- Microsoft (R) Visual Studio (R) 2015 (14.0) > > Hexagon QA <llvm.buildmaster at quicinc.com> > hexagon-build-02 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.9.2-10ubuntu13) 4.9.2 > hexagon-build-03 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.9.2-10ubuntu13) 4.9.2 &...
2019 Feb 02
2
[RFC] migrating past C++11
...re have no idea what they run. Here are the bots that will definitely break, with their maintainers: >>> >>> Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com <mailto:gkistanova at gmail.com>> >>> am1i-slv1 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.3) 4.8.4 >>> as-bldslv4 -- Microsoft (R) Visual Studio (R) 2015 (14.0) >>> ps4-buildslave2 -- Microsoft (R) Visual Studio (R) 2015 (14.0) >>> >>> Hexagon QA <llvm.buildmaster at quicinc.com <mailto:llvm.buildmaster at quicinc.com>> >>> hexagon-build-02 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.9.2-...
2019 Feb 07
5
[RFC] migrating past C++11
...Some of them are down, I therefore have no idea what they run. Here are the bots that will definitely break, with their maintainers: > > Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com <mailto:gkistanova at gmail.com>> > am1i-slv1 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.3) 4.8.4 > as-bldslv4 -- Microsoft (R) Visual Studio (R) 2015 (14.0) > ps4-buildslave2 -- Microsoft (R) Visual Studio (R) 2015 (14.0) > > Hexagon QA <llvm.buildmaster at quicinc.com <mailto:llvm.buildmaster at quicinc.com>> > hexagon-build-02 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.9.2-10ubuntu13) 4.9.2 > hexagon-b...
2019 Jan 26
4
[RFC] migrating past C++11
+1, thanks again for driving this. On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 3:57 PM JF Bastien via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > The discussion seems to have died down and gotten good consensus. I’ve > therefore create a patch which applies the proposed soft-errors: > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D57264 > > > We’ll only migrate to hard-error (and start using new