search for: blaiming

...below) tests the strcspn function and does not use any header from LLVM, completely unrelated to GlobalValue. Yet, the buildbot reports that r239457 and r239458 were built OK and the failure started in my patch r239459: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-ppc64-linux1 Why is the builbot blaiming r239459? is this a buildbot bug? Yaron strcspn-2.c ==================== // Test stopset overflow in strcspn function // RUN: %clang_asan %s -o %t && ASAN_OPTIONS=strict_string_checks=true not %run %t 2>&1 | FileCheck %s // Test intercept_strcspn asan option // RUN: ASAN_OPTIONS=i...

Good morning Stefan, Hmm, yes, i notice some things also with the debian 9.8 upgrade, that killed my kopano server. Was a long night yesterday. :-( but fixed. Ive done all my servers here and no samba problems. I do know of more problems with docker. There is a small difference, i dont know exact were, but i detected that on the kopano forum. Kopano builds it packages within docker, the

Am 22.02.19 um 12:16 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > Hai, > > Well, i did some extra checking, gone throug more logs. > ... Nothing. No errors. Sorry, i cant find anything.. > > Almost all my server run unattended updates, execpt the DC's. > > I had a few that where waiting for a reboot tomorrow night, all now rebooted, > and no problems before and

Hai, Well, i did some extra checking, gone throug more logs. ... Nothing. No errors. Sorry, i cant find anything.. Almost all my server run unattended updates, execpt the DC's. I had a few that where waiting for a reboot tomorrow night, all now rebooted, and no problems before and after. So its bit hard to detect whats going on at your side. Are all you servers having this or a few.

Hello I am having this compilation error while running 'configure'. It fails to detect the xpm.h file which in fact is where it is supposed be. I am running RH70 and xpm&xpm-dev rpms are installed. Codeweavers FAQ offers a solution to this problem: http://wine.codeweavers.com/fom-meta/cache/38.html ... "I changed 'configure' line 980 from: if mkdir conftestdir;

On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 13:59:36 +0100 "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am 22.02.19 um 12:16 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > > Hai, > > > > Well, i did some extra checking, gone throug more logs. > > ... Nothing. No errors. Sorry, i cant find anything.. > > > > Almost all my server run unattended

Ok, guys... Please be gentle with me. I have what is going to be the strangest question you will have ever heard, but I have no idea what to tell this person. I set up Asterisk 3 or 4 weeks ago, everything is running smooth. My receptionist has told me on two different occasions that she tried to transfer a call by pressing "#", and she heard a buzz noise in the phone and the

Hiya, I''m trying to track down some throughput latency that our customer seems to be attributing to our product, I can''t see what he''s talking about, but I want to try and get some deeper granularity than I might get with something like smokeping, and maybe even see if its down to something tunable on our end. I''ve been looking for some examples on how

Hai Stefan, Hmm is time in sync. Did that server have these 3 settings in smb.conf? Yes/no/which ones ? kerberos method = secrets and keytab dedicated keytab file = /etc/krb5.keytab # renew the kerberos ticket winbind refresh tickets = yes Especialy the refresh ticket.. I see this is a RID setup? Not AD. Because if thats so, i run only in AD backend on the members. Can

Dear All, There is no advantage of GUI over CLI, IMO. The real issue is the answer to the questions: "What should I do next?" or "What am I allowed to do here?" A "nice" interface, not necessarily GUI, will offer friendly answers: "I was expecting you to do _this_" or "In this situation you are allowed to do _these things_" You see, it's all

Hi folks, we'd like to provision new Samba servers (file sharing only) with the system keytab. It will precreated by some other process (msktutil) because we don't have direct access to a domain admin account. Is there any degragation in functionality by not using "secrets and keytab" and not doing "net ads join"? This is somewhat similiar to my question from

Hallo, "never change a running system" ... For some months I run btrfs unter kernel 3.2.5 and 3.2.9, without problems. Yesterday I compiled kernel 3.3.4, and this morning I started the machine with this kernel. There may be some ugly problems. Copying something into the btrfs "directory" worked well for some files, and then I got error messages (I''ve not