Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "blackscorpio".
2013 Jan 24
4
Difference between R and SAS in Corcordance index in ordinal logistic regression
...Concordant Uncertain
32.00000000 722.00000000 699.00000000 0.00000000
I.e., C=.968 instead of .963. But this is even farther away than the value
from SAS you reported.
If you don't believe the rcorr.cens result, create a tiny example and do the
calculations by hand.
Frank
blackscorpio81 wrote
> Dear R users,
>
> Please allow to me ask for your help.
> I am currently using Frank Harrell Jr package "rms" to model ordinal
> logistic regression with proportional odds. In order to assess model
> predictive ability, C concordance index is displayed and eq...
2010 Jul 23
2
glm - prediction of a factor with several levels
Dear community,
I'm currently attempting to predict the occurence of an event (factor)
having more than 2 levels with several continuous predictors. The model
being ordinal, I was waiting the glm function to return several intercepts,
which is not the case when looking to my results (I only have one
intercept). I finally managed to perform an ordinal polytomous logisitc
regression with the
2010 Sep 06
3
likelyhood maximization problem with polr
Dear community,
I am currently trying to fit an ordinal logistic regression model with the
polr function. I often get the same error message :
"attempt to find suitable starting values failed", for example with :
require(MASS)
data(iris)
polr(Species~Sepal.Length+Sepal.Width+Petal.Length+Petal.Width,iris)
(I know the response variable Species should be nominal but I do as levels
2010 Nov 03
2
bugs and misfeatures in polr(MASS).... fixed!
In polr.R the (several) functions gmin and fmin contain the code
> theta <- beta[pc + 1L:q]
> gamm <- c(-100, cumsum(c(theta[1L], exp(theta[-1L]))), 100)
That's bad. There's no reason to suppose beta[pc+1L] is larger than
-100 or that the cumulative sum is smaller than 100. For practical
datasets those assumptions are frequently violated, causing the
2010 Jul 26
1
After writing data in MMF using SEXP structure, can i reference in R?
...UTC)
From: Ben Bolker <[101]bbolker at gmail.com>
To: [102]r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [R] glm - prediction of a factor with several levels
Message-ID: <[103]loom.20100724T175114-259 at post.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
blackscorpio <olivier.collignon <at> live.fr> writes:
> I'm currently attempting to predict the occurence of an event (factor)
> having more than 2 levels with several continuous predictors. The model
> being ordinal, I was waiting the glm function to return several...
2011 Nov 03
0
L1 penalization for proportional odds logistic regression
Dear community,
I am currently attempting to perform a (L1) penalized ordinal logistic
regression with proportional odds. For the moment I only found R packages
allowing to perform forward or backward continuation ratio model with
several penalizations.
Does anyone have a clue of what R package I could use ? I am not even quite
sure that penalized logistic regression with proportional odds has