search for: bkmk_sch50

...name revealed nothing as well. > > I read this output to tell me that the schema upgrade went through Sch49.ldf.diff without issue, but ran into some kind of problem in Sch50.ldf.diff OR... there appears to be a section in Schema-Updates.md for Sch50.ldf: line 3120 " ### <a name="BKMK_Sch50"></a>Sch50.ldf" and something about the syntax below that line is going bad? Indeed, I do have some attributes in that section commented out: > > CN=ms-DS-Primary-Computer,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=X > CN=ms-DS-Is-Primary-Computer-For,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration...

On Wed, 2020-11-18 at 23:12 +0000, Matthew Delfino Samba List via samba wrote: > > There is only one thing that concerns me: One of the attributes > specified in the Samba script has a parameter whose value directly > contradicts the value specified in my old ldif file: > Well done with the analysis! > > In Samba script: > > dn:

...ealed nothing as well. > > I read this output to tell me that the schema upgrade went through Sch49.ldf.diff without issue, but ran into some kind of problem in Sch50.ldf.diff OR... there appears to be a section in Schema-Updates.md for Sch50.ldf: line 3120 " ### <a name="BKMK_Sch50"></a>Sch50.ldf" and something about the syntax below that line is going bad? Indeed, I do have some attributes in that section commented out: > > CN=ms-DS-Primary-Computer,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=X > CN=ms-DS-Is-Primary-Computer-For,CN=Schema,CN=C...

...by that name revealed nothing as well. I read this output to tell me that the schema upgrade went through Sch49.ldf.diff without issue, but ran into some kind of problem in Sch50.ldf.diff OR... there appears to be a section in Schema-Updates.md for Sch50.ldf: line 3120 " ### <a name="BKMK_Sch50"></a>Sch50.ldf" and something about the syntax below that line is going bad? Indeed, I do have some attributes in that section commented out: CN=ms-DS-Primary-Computer,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=X CN=ms-DS-Is-Primary-Computer-For,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=X CN=ms-DS...