Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "bits_per_fat_entri".
Did you mean:
bits_per_fat_entry
2016 Feb 25
0
[PATCH 1/5] fat: fix minfatsize for large FAT32
> Hi Ady,
>
> On 2016.02.25 02:08, Ady via Syslinux wrote:
> > There is an "extra" sector, in comparison to... what exactly?
>
> Sorry if I wasn't clear. I think I implied that the Large FAT32 fat size
> had an extra sector compared to minfatsize, when of course I meant the
> opposite (the Large FAT32 has one less sector than the minfatsize
>
2016 Feb 25
3
[PATCH 1/5] fat: fix minfatsize for large FAT32
Hi Ady,
On 2016.02.25 02:08, Ady via Syslinux wrote:
> There is an "extra" sector, in comparison to... what exactly?
Sorry if I wasn't clear. I think I implied that the Large FAT32 fat size
had an extra sector compared to minfatsize, when of course I meant the
opposite (the Large FAT32 has one less sector than the minfatsize
computed by the unpatched code, hence the check