Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "bitmat".
Did you mean:
bitmap
2017 Aug 04
2
[PATCH v13 4/5] mm: support reporting free page blocks
On 08/04/2017 03:53 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 04-08-17 00:02:01, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 03:20:09PM +0000, Wang, Wei W wrote:
>>> On Thursday, August 3, 2017 9:51 PM, Michal Hocko:
>>>> As I've said earlier. Start simple optimize incrementally with some numbers to
>>>> justify a more subtle code.
>>>> --
2017 Aug 04
2
[PATCH v13 4/5] mm: support reporting free page blocks
On 08/04/2017 03:53 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 04-08-17 00:02:01, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 03:20:09PM +0000, Wang, Wei W wrote:
>>> On Thursday, August 3, 2017 9:51 PM, Michal Hocko:
>>>> As I've said earlier. Start simple optimize incrementally with some numbers to
>>>> justify a more subtle code.
>>>> --
2017 Aug 04
0
[PATCH v13 4/5] mm: support reporting free page blocks
...> B. In reality, I think it's uncommon to see this ring getting
> full (I didn't observe ring full in the tests), since the host
> (consumer) is notified to take out the page block right
> after it is added.
I thought you only updated a pre allocated bitmat... Anyway, I cannot
comment on this part much as I am not familiar with your usecase.
> - Option 2: Put the callback function outside the lock
> What's input into the callback is just a pfn, and the callback
> won't access the corresponding pages. So, I still think it won...