search for: bitcoins

...B) He uses system BerkeleyDB. I build BerkeleyDB when building bitcoin because BerkeleyDB is fragile enough that changes to it can cause a wallet that can't be read by other clients. C) He adds a patch that adds functionality needed by a very small demographic - hardware machines that sell bitcoins. I prefer to not add that patch because I prefer pristine source rather than modifying what the devs produced for a feature 99.9% of the population doesn't need. So I prefer to stick with the precise version that bitcoin.org uses in the binary builds they distribute. Happens to be same vers...

On 02/24/2016 06:04 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Alice Wonder wrote: >> For those interested I have a working spec file for Bitcoin 0.12.0 >> >> https://github.com/AliceWonderMiscreations/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/rpm/bitcoin.spec >> >> I believe the only BuildRequires that isn't in CentOS/EPEL is >> miniupnpc-devel but that's trivial to build

With this post, I run the risk of causing more of the thing that I speak against. I still think it's important to say it. CentOS mailing list is a technical forum. It is not a political forum. Just reading a thread on bitcoins and the entire thread quickly turned into a political thread with people bitching about everything from Chase Bank to the Russians, and that's just crap. Wildly inappropriate. If you don't like Bitcoins, you should just not reply because you aren't going to use the Bitcoin software....

Alice Wonder wrote: > For those interested I have a working spec file for Bitcoin 0.12.0 > > https://github.com/AliceWonderMiscreations/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/rpm/bitcoin.spec > > I believe the only BuildRequires that isn't in CentOS/EPEL is > miniupnpc-devel but that's trivial to build as well. > > With Bitcoin 0.12.0 the ECC stuff that Red Hat ripped out of

Alice Wonder wrote: > On 02/24/2016 06:04 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Alice Wonder wrote: >>> For those interested I have a working spec file for Bitcoin 0.12.0 >>> >>> https://github.com/AliceWonderMiscreations/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/rpm/bitcoin.spec >>> >>> I believe the only BuildRequires that isn't in CentOS/EPEL is

On 02/24/2016 06:06 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 02/24/2016 06:04 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Alice Wonder wrote: >>> For those interested I have a working spec file for Bitcoin 0.12.0 >>> >>> https://github.com/AliceWonderMiscreations/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/rpm/bitcoin.spec >>> >>> >>> I believe the only BuildRequires that

> Meanwhile banks like Chase charge poor people $12.00 a month just have > checking and push debit card paychecks on low income jobs where they > charge just for the poor to check how much they have on it. That bad, huh?

Hello Rusers, Introducing *coindeskr - *an R package to access coindesk API Bitcoin Price Index (Including Historic Price). https://github.com/amrrs/coindeskr https://cran.r-project.org/package=coindeskr Please share your feedback using it. Regards, Abdul [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _______________________________________________ R-packages mailing list R-packages at r-project.org

Hello Rusers, Introducing *coindeskr - *an R package to access coindesk API Bitcoin Price Index (Including Historic Price). https://github.com/amrrs/coindeskr https://cran.r-project.org/package=coindeskr Please share your feedback using it. Regards, Abdul [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _______________________________________________ R-packages mailing list R-packages at r-project.org

Asic-technologies.com 9.3-9.9 GHash/sec 6 Board (has 48 chips) - 30 BTC - $3000 USD This unit will make: Coins per 24h at these conditions 0.2965 BTC Revenue per day29.08 USD Each module board uses about 31 Watts of power. Mining board's supplied , Case, power supply , On-board heat sink , USB connectors. Ready assembled All the boards are linked together , With one main controller. Easy to

Asic-technologies.com 9.3-9.9 GHash/sec 6 Board (has 48 chips) - 30 BTC - $3000 USD This unit will make: Coins per 24h at these conditions 0.2965 BTC Revenue per day29.08 USD Each module board uses about 31 Watts of power. Mining board's supplied , Case, power supply , On-board heat sink , USB connectors. Ready assembled All the boards are linked together , With one main controller. Easy to

...On 03/07/2016 02:35 PM, Benjamin Smith wrote: > With this post, I run the risk of causing more of the thing that I speak > against. I still think it's important to say it. > > CentOS mailing list is a technical forum. It is not a political forum. > > Just reading a thread on bitcoins and the entire thread quickly turned into a > political thread with people bitching about everything from Chase Bank to the > Russians, and that's just crap. Wildly inappropriate. If you don't like > Bitcoins, you should just not reply because you aren't going to use the > B...

Hello to everybody,   I seem to be in struggle with the websockets in R. I wanted to download the streaming data from the BitCoin exchange MtGox directly to R, but R cannot establish the connection. The websocket specs are defined as: * Host: websocket.mtgox.com or socketio.mtgox.com * Port: 80 or 443 ( ssl ) * Namespace: /mtgox (Including beginning slash) url for more

Is there any blog that has information on a potential RHEL 8 release date? boost in 7 is now too old for some things, in addition to gcc. There are solutions in 7 to those issues but it's starting to feel like 6 felt shortly before 7 came out, so I wonder if it is getting near to time. I'm working on a major project bitcoin related and it would be frustrating to deploy a bunch of

Did you know you can use systemd to turn on tmpfs for /tmp ??? I had no clue that was possible, always did it through fstab - but systemctl is-enabled tmp.mount That will tell you if systemd has configured /tmp to mount as tmpfs (default in CentOS 7 is no) systemctl enable tmp.mount That, as you can probably guess, tells systemd to mount /tmp as tmpfs next time the system boots. -=- Just

Getting strange loading problem.. >> bundle exec rspec -p spec/models/* give error: .. .rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/activesupport-3.1.1/lib/active_support/ dependencies.rb:240:in `require'': no such file to load -- rspec/rails (LoadError) from /home/slava/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/activesupport-3.1.1/ lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:240:in `block in require'' from

Since 2008, Microsoft (formerly Revolution Analytics) staff and guests have written about R every weekday at the Revolutions blog (http://blog.revolutionanalytics.com) and every month I post a summary of articles from the previous month of particular interest to readers of r-help. In case you missed them, here are some articles related to R from the month of July: A tutorial on using the

We use GCC 6 from SoftwareCollection 6 and build our own Boost libraries with static linking. The result binaries work on all C7 instances just fine without the need to install any extra packages. The binary size isn't bloated too much by statically linking Boost, because many Boost functions are header templates anyway (but your mileage may vary). Not sure if you have other dependencies but

Hi, there! I have a doubt about if this server supports unicast, multicast or both. I was looking for information in the web but I couldn't found anything. Anyone can help me? Thanks -- Fran Delgado (ThinWay) Tumblr: http://thinway.tumblr.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/thinway -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

@Phil nice text... just want to mention (or better ask...) what the difference between a protocol which implements multiple connections simultaneously and a protocol implementing multiple connections by connection tracking? In the end... its the same... On 04.05.2016 10:25, Philipp Schafft wrote: > Good morning, > > On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 00:15 +0200, Fran Delgado wrote: >> Hi,