Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "bitbucketc".
Did you mean:
bitbucket
2016 May 31
0
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?
...some disvantages, but
> many advantages. Furthermore, not hosting our own repos would save us
> a lot of headaches, admin costs and timed out connections.
>
> TL;DR: GitHub + git submodules [1] could replace all the functionality
> we have currently with SVN.
>
> (also GitLab, BitBucketc, etc).
>
> Here are some of the arguments made on IRC...
>
> 1. Due to SVN, we can't re-write history. If we use some GitHub
> properties [2], we could have the same effect.
>
> 2. Due to SVN, we have a mandatory time sequence, so commits go first
> in LLVM, then Clang (...
2016 May 31
30
GitHub anyone?
...to a Git-only solution would have some disvantages, but
many advantages. Furthermore, not hosting our own repos would save us
a lot of headaches, admin costs and timed out connections.
TL;DR: GitHub + git submodules [1] could replace all the functionality
we have currently with SVN.
(also GitLab, BitBucketc, etc).
Here are some of the arguments made on IRC...
1. Due to SVN, we can't re-write history. If we use some GitHub
properties [2], we could have the same effect.
2. Due to SVN, we have a mandatory time sequence, so commits go first
in LLVM, then Clang (for example), and buildbots don't...
2016 May 31
0
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?
...t of headaches, admin costs and timed out connections.
Not everyone thinks git is a step forward. Please do not force people
to use a "git-only" solution.
> TL;DR: GitHub + git submodules [1] could replace all the functionality
> we have currently with SVN.
>
> (also GitLab, BitBucketc, etc).
>
> Here are some of the arguments made on IRC...
>
> 1. Due to SVN, we can't re-write history. If we use some GitHub
> properties [2], we could have the same effect.
>
> 2. Due to SVN, we have a mandatory time sequence, so commits go first
> in LLVM, then Clang (...
2016 May 31
2
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?
...some disvantages, but
> many advantages. Furthermore, not hosting our own repos would save us
> a lot of headaches, admin costs and timed out connections.
>
> TL;DR: GitHub + git submodules [1] could replace all the functionality
> we have currently with SVN.
>
> (also GitLab, BitBucketc, etc).
>
> Here are some of the arguments made on IRC...
>
> 1. Due to SVN, we can't re-write history. If we use some GitHub
> properties [2], we could have the same effect.
Are you referring to linear commit history being maintained going
forward or what specifically?
>
>...