search for: bitblock

...ows/network admin&debugging + scripting experience essential. Must be able to work independently! The work load is variable but will probably settle down to few hours a week (wish I can offer a fulltime position but we are a small startup company!). If interested please email jobs113242@bitblocks.com with a your resume & please provide a tel # where I can reach you. The job is at my work place (not at bitblocks.com, which is my own domain). The weird email address is so that I can disable it after a while! Thanks! -- bakul

The error message is the usual panic error - 3.0.11 and FreeBSD 4.8. Samba 3.0.8 ran fine with the same config (admittedly there were a few roaming profile sync related crashes, which is why I was upgrading). Now however I can't even connect - it crashes immediately, respawns and crashes again. My Samba server is a domain member of a Win2003 domain controller used for roaming profile

...overly unusual. I''m very grateful that there are people on this list who can respond - even when it''s outside the scope of the list. Thanks guys! Mitch -----Original Message----- From: Ian Campbell [mailto:Ian.Campbell@citrix.com] Sent: September 24, 2013 2:40 AM To: Mitch (BitBlock) Cc: ''eneal@businessgrade.com''; ''Xen-users@lists.xen.org''; ''jaceksburghardt@gmail.com'' Subject: Re: [Xen-users] fresh xcp 1.6 & xenserver install fails on first boot (kernel not found). On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 00:02 +0000, mitch@bitblock.net...

I read this (http://www.petur.eu/blog/?p=459) blog post today. It's about that a remote user with root privilegs to a FreeBSD jail & user privileges to the jails host machine can obtain root privileges on the host machine. Can someone confirm if this bugg/exploit works?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm trying to run a QEMU VM on top of a FreeBSD 7.x server ... I've tried the exact same setup on my desktop, using 192.168.1.x and an fxp device, and it all works perfectly, but as soon as I do this on another machine on a public IP, I'm not getting any routing, I can't even ping it from the same machine ... My first thought was

Not sure if it''s been posted yet, my email is currently down... http://weblog.infoworld.com/yager/archives/2007/10/suns_zfs_is_clo.html Interesting piece. This is the second post from Yager that shows solaris in a pretty good light. I particularly like his closing comment: "If you haven''t checked out ZFS yet, do, because it will eventually become ubiquitously implemented

If you are interested *and* live in the SF Bay area, please send your resume to samir.jain@us.fujitsu.com (not to me). Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------- Fujitsu Network Communications Inc. is an innovator and strategic partner with over 20 years of experience as a leading provider of wireline and wireless networking solutions that solve critical business

I am striking out with my usual contacts. A friend's company is looking for a contractor with some knowledge of Linux, Solaris & AIX kernels (sorry, no *BSD). I think this is easy work for someone who has done moderately complex kernel work in these kernel. No opportunity to learn on the job. My guess is the work will last about 6 months, may be a year. The work is in the SF Bay Area

I was following docs from http://ftp.easynet.be/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/passdb.html#mysq lsam But I?m stumped I?m running FreeBSD 4.8, and need to create a mapped relationship between SOME windows users and SOME freebsd users I got Samba 3.0.8 running based on : ./configure --with-krb5=/usr/heimdal And everything works if I manually add matching Windows usernames to my etc/passwd,

Sorry - sent before completed.- my apologies for the dup. I've got Samba set up with the homes share configured. I've added the settings under the Terminal Services Profile tab of a test user. When I log in, the folder specified is created, but it doesn't receive any data files until the user logs off. In the NT event viewer, I see : Event Type: Warning Event

[originally reported for ZFS on FreeBSD but Pawel Jakub Dawid says this problem also exists on Solaris hence this email.] Summary: on ZFS, overhead for reading a hole seems far worse than actual reading from a disk. Small buffers are used to make this overhead more visible. I ran the following script on both ZFS and UF2 filesystems. [Note that on FreeBSD cat uses a 4k buffer and md5 uses a 1k