search for: bistro

On the last LLVM dev meeting I was surprised to find more llvmers that work on the GTA. Maybe we could organize a small social meeting similar to what happens in the bay area? I would propose scheduling the first one for Wednesday next week (the 29th). Is the date good? Would the beer bistro on King be a good place? Cheers, Rafael

2012/2/24 Xin Tong <xerox.time.tech at gmail.com>: > Hopefully you mean sometime in the evening on 29th. If this is the > case, count me in. Good point, I forgot to select a time :-) What about 19:00? > Thanks Cheers, Rafael

It would be fun to meet some other LLVM developers in TO, 7:00 on wed at beer bistro should work for me. Andrew On 02/24/2012 05:22 PM, Rafael Espíndola wrote: > 2012/2/24 Xin Tong<xerox.time.tech at gmail.com>: >> Hopefully you mean sometime in the evening on 29th. If this is the >> case, count me in. > Good point, I forgot to select a time :-) > What...

Sorry for being late at organizing this one. Just remembered when I saw the email about the bay area one. Who would be able to go to the Beer Bistro this Thursday at 19:00? Cheers, Rafael

If you have bash-completion-extras (or the equivalent for your bistro) installed, you should be able to type ?man vfs? and hit tab completion to see your list of available vfs objects. > On Oct 30, 2019, at 11:38 AM, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 30/10/2019 17:32, torch via samba wrote: >> Is the ?important&qu...

...> > Do we have a more suitable tool for such debugging functionality? dsymutil for ELF? dsymutil is such a tool, but it uses the llvm::ObjectFile layer and the llvm targets, so if you open a file that contains "armv7" architecture and the ARM target hasn't been built into your bistro, it will fail to open this binary with an error that says: No available targets are compatible with triple "arm-unknown-unknown" I ran into this with a recent gsym patch that is trying to fix the buildbots for testing, but it fails when the ARM targets are not enabled and I try to load...

I'm taking Talin's idea and running with it with respect to the Austin area. If you're into LLVM and within easy-enough driving distance to make it worthwhile to get together every month or so in Austin, please post here. If there's enough interest, I'll set something up at a local restaurant or someplace like that.

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Kenneth Uildriks <kennethuil at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm taking Talin's idea and running with it with respect to the Austin > area.  If you're into LLVM and within easy-enough driving distance to > make it worthwhile to get together every month or so in Austin, please > post here.  If there's enough interest, I'll set something

12:00 PM at Bombay Bistro, 183 at Braker next to HEB.

I will tentatively schedule it for Friday, 12/4/2009. Unless the group gets significantly larger, we can meet again at Bombay Bistro.

I'm still planning to meet this Friday at Bombay Bistro (183 & Braker, next to HEB).

...LLVM dev meeting I was surprised to find more llvmers that > work on the GTA. Maybe we could organize a small social meeting > similar to what happens in the bay area? > > I would propose scheduling the first one for Wednesday next week (the > 29th). Is the date good? Would the beer bistro on King be a good > place? > > Cheers, > Rafael > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

can we get a confirmation on who is coming tomorrow ? Thanks Xin 2012/2/24 Andrew Clinton <andrew at sidefx.com>: > It would be fun to meet some other LLVM developers in TO, 7:00 on wed at > beer bistro should work for me. > > Andrew > > > On 02/24/2012 05:22 PM, Rafael Espíndola wrote: >> >> 2012/2/24 Xin Tong<xerox.time.tech at gmail.com>: >>> >>> Hopefully you mean sometime in the evening on 29th. If this is the >>> case, count me in....

...inually on new releases or if this is something that CentOS is willing to pick up and maintain. - John "Warthog9" Hawley Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote: > > Hey > > I was wondering if I could help to get a CentOS image on boot.kernel > > Would be really nice to have more bistros available. > > Cheers Didi > ---- > > My www page: www.ribalba.de > Email / Jabber: ribalba at gmail.com > Skype : ribalba > > _______________________________________________ > BKO mailing list > BKO at hera.kernel.org > http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/...

...suitable tool for such debugging functionality? dsymutil > for ELF? > > > dsymutil is such a tool, but it uses the llvm::ObjectFile layer and the > llvm targets, so if you open a file that contains "armv7" architecture and > the ARM target hasn't been built into your bistro, it will fail to open > this binary with an error that says: > > No available targets are compatible with triple "arm-unknown-unknown" > > I ran into this with a recent gsym patch that is trying to fix the > buildbots for testing, but it fails when the ARM targets are no...

Is the ?important" vfs objects parameter documented in a man page anywhere? It appears in the man pages of several vfs modules, but never fully documented that I could find. Apparently it once was from a now dead link https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/old/Samba3-HOWTO/smb.conf.5.html#VFSOBJECTS <https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/old/Samba3-HOWTO/smb.conf.5.html#VFSOBJECTS> . Todd

...ebugging functionality? >> dsymutil for ELF? >> >> >> dsymutil is such a tool, but it uses the llvm::ObjectFile layer and the >> llvm targets, so if you open a file that contains "armv7" architecture and >> the ARM target hasn't been built into your bistro, it will fail to open >> this binary with an error that says: >> >> No available targets are compatible with triple "arm-unknown-unknown" >> >> I ran into this with a recent gsym patch that is trying to fix the >> buildbots for testing, but it fails whe...

...>>> dsymutil for ELF? >>> >>> >>> dsymutil is such a tool, but it uses the llvm::ObjectFile layer and the >>> llvm targets, so if you open a file that contains "armv7" architecture and >>> the ARM target hasn't been built into your bistro, it will fail to open >>> this binary with an error that says: >>> >>> No available targets are compatible with triple "arm-unknown-unknown" >>> >>> I ran into this with a recent gsym patch that is trying to fix the >>> buildbots for t...

I am looking to create a tool that can add Apple or DWARF5 accelerator tables to fully linked executables that contain DWARF. This will help us benchmark how much accelerator tables can improve the debugging experience as debuggers don't need to manually index all of the debug info during debugging. Looking at how accelerator tables are currently emitted, they seem to be built up as DWARF is