Displaying 20 results from an estimated 699 matches for "bisons".
Did you mean:
bison
2005 Jun 27
2
[LLVMdev] Including flex/bison output in cvs
Hi all,
At the moment, LLVM includes the .l, .y sources that are compiled by
flex and biston via make. This is fine for most unix developers. For
windows developers, it's a bit more of a pain to download flex/bison,
but is still a one-time thing.
However, anyone releasing an llvm frontend will require their users to
have flex/bison. Most (but not all) unix boxes have them, but almost
no
2005 Jun 29
0
[LLVMdev] Including flex/bison output in cvs
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Alexander Friedman wrote:
> Hi all,
> have flex/bison. Most (but not all) unix boxes have them, but almost
> no windows boxes have them. This requires either
>
> 1) Forcing the user to dowload flex/bison (bad)
> 2) Distributing flex/bison with the front-end (not as bad, but a pain)
>
> 3) or, and this seems like a simple fix, just distribute the output
2005 Jul 01
1
[LLVMdev] Including flex/bison output in cvs
On 6/29/05, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Alexander Friedman wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > have flex/bison. Most (but not all) unix boxes have them, but almost
> > no windows boxes have them. This requires either
> >
> > 1) Forcing the user to dowload flex/bison (bad)
> > 2) Distributing flex/bison with the front-end (not as
2005 Jun 02
2
bison/flex version warning
Hi,
(I seem to be having some trouble getting messages to post on the list so
I may be duplicating an earlier post. Apologies if this is the case.)
I am compiling CVS tip Asterisk on a fresh CentOS 3.4 install. I got
this warning:
make ast_expr.a
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/asterisk'
bison -v -d --name-prefix=ast_yy ast_expr.y -o ast_expr.c
2012 Apr 13
1
[PATCH] libxl/build: print a pretty message if flex/bison are needed but not found
This patchs adds better support for both Flex and Bison, which might be needed
to compile libxl. Now configure script sets BISON and FLEX Makefile vars if
bison and flex are found, but doesn''t complain if they are not found.
Also, added some Makefile soccery to print a nice error message if Bison or Flex
are needed but not found.
Please run autogen after applying this patch.
2012 Apr 12
6
fatal error if Flex and Bison is not configured
Hi all,
I try to build xen 4.2( revision number: 25161) on Ubuntu 11.10_amd64, Mac
pro. After running ./configure and make. I got the following fatal error:
*libxlu_cfg_y.y:22:26: fatal error: libxlu_cfg_l.h: No such file or
directory compilation terminated.*
So the original libxlu_cfg_l.h is deleted when making, and should be
regenerated but it is not. I find the path of flex and bison is not
2007 Sep 17
3
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Emil Mikulic wrote:
>> The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing:
>> http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/
>
> I suspect the utils/TableGen/FileParser.h.cvs in the tarball may be
> stale. I tried building LLVM without bison installed and got:
Can you try it again without bison with these files:
2004 Sep 01
2
[LLVMdev] More configure problems
I want to play around with the GLR support in the recent bison, so I
simply fixed the skeleton.
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 07:31:25 -0700 Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 21:46, Jeff Cohen wrote:
> > I'm using bison 1.875. But it worked the last time, so I don't know why
> > it doesn't work now. Deleting the __attribute__ clause fixes
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 12:25:40PM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Emil Mikulic wrote:
> >> The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing:
> >> http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/
> >
> > I suspect the utils/TableGen/FileParser.h.cvs in the tarball may be
> > stale. I tried building LLVM without bison installed and got:
2008 Jun 17
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM on OpenBSD
> If you use bison instead of yacc this bug is not exposed.
>
> Is this correct behavior?
I guess so. bison is quite different to yacc, see "info bison".
llvm depends on bison and this is quite well documented. At
http://llvm.org/releases/2.3/docs/GettingStarted.html#software
it says "bison" and specifically which version of Bison you've
to use.
2004 Nov 04
2
[LLVMdev] Re: LLVM Visual Studio Project files
I have problems getting the GNU tools to execute properly. I installed
bison, sed, and flex from gnuwin32.sourceforge.net as suggested in the
README. The installers for these packages did not want to put them in
the llvm/win32/{tools,share} directory, which is unfortunately where the
project files expect them to be. I copied the files manually to these
directories, but bison still refuses to
2008 Feb 13
4
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
I have flex and bison from Cygwin installed:
$ flex --version
flex version 2.5.4
$ bison --version
bison (GNU Bison) 2.3
Written by Robert Corbett and Richard Stallman.
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Should that work,
2007 Sep 18
1
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
More bison woes. llvm-2.1 + the patch Chris mentioned builds without
bison, but llvm-gcc4 doesn't:
/home/emil/ll/llvm-gcc4.0-2.1.source/missing bison -d -o gengtype-yacc.c ../../llvm-gcc4.0-2.1.source/gcc/gengtype-yacc.y
WARNING: `bison' missing on your system. You should only need it if
you modified a `.y' file. You may need the `Bison' package
in order for
2015 Oct 14
4
Incoming rsync connection attempts
Greetings -
In my logwatch report this morning I noticed reference to an attempt to
connect to rsync from an external IP address. It doesn't appear that
the connection was successful based on correlating information between
/var/log/secure and /var/log/messages. But I am looking for some
suggestions for implementing more preventative measures, if necessary.
The log information from
2007 May 17
3
[LLVMdev] 2.0-prerelease build errors
Hi all,
I'm building the LLVM 2.0 pre-release on a brand new FreeBSD 6.2
install. Without the bison package installed, the build breaks:
$ tar zxf llvm-2.0.tar.gz
$ mkdir objdir
$ cd objdir
$ ../llvm-2.0/configure
$ gmake
[...]
gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/home/emil/objdir/utils/TableGen'
llvm[2]: Compiling AsmWriterEmitter.cpp for Release build
llvm[2]: Compiling
2008 Feb 13
4
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
Thanks for your comment.
I also tried for LLVM 2.2 but got the same compilation errors on VS2005. (I didn't modify anything before the compilation)
I just wonder if I need bison and flex even just in the case of compiling them on VS2005 without changing anything because the LLVM doc says "If you plan to modify any .y or .l files, you will need to have bison and/or flex installed where
2004 Jul 14
2
RE: [Asterisk-User] asterisk compile problem
From: "Nik Martin" <nmartin@radiancetech.com>>
To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>>
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk compile problem
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 09:22:38 -0500
Organization: Radiance Technologies, Inc.
Reply-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Fletcher Bonds wrote:
>> Hello all
>>
>> As of 5pm PST today (7/13), I pulled
2008 Feb 13
0
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
I have always built it with flex and bison installed, though I believe
Chris removed our last dependence on flex a little while back, so you
may not need that. I'm using bison 2.1 which I got from the getgnuwin32
folks. I imagine that if you have cygwin or the like, you probably
already have everything.
You will need to have the executables in your path.
I build with VisualStudio 2k5
2008 Feb 14
0
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
>I have flex and bison from Cygwin installed:
WinGNU32 Flex and Bison are the ones to use with LLVM and Visual Studio.
http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/
The LLVM Visual Studio .sln file is for Visual Studio 2003 so will require
conversion and some minor modification.
Aaron
> Should that work, assuming they're on the PATH? When I ran the build from
> inside VS, I get some
2004 Aug 31
2
[LLVMdev] More configure problems
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 21:27:26 -0700
Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 20:48:45 -0700
> Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote:
>
> > When I ran configure after updating, I get various errors. First:
> >
> > % ../configure --enable-jit --with-llvmgccdir=/home/llvm/cfrontend/x86/llvm-gcc
> > checking for a