search for: binutills

Good morning, I am trying to install binutils-devel on Centos Linux 5.5 so that we can obtain lib liberty required by the oprofile-0.9.6 Linux profiler. Using root , I enter: yum local install binutils-devel-2.20.51.0.7-6.fc14.i686.rpm. Then I get the message: Public key for binutils-devel-2.20.51.0.7-6.fc14.i686.rpm is not installed. Please tell me where I get the Public key for

> > Yes, it is a bug in ld. I have been working with H.J. and we have just tracked it down. > > > > > It seems that hjl helped, after all. > > Syslinux built, or better to write, linked with: > binutils 2.26.51.20160212 git 95c00d1 is salt-n-pepa. > > Both, ISOLINUX and EXTLINUX have passed the test on both, SeaBIOS and Bare-metal. > > Thanks hpa.

Just FYI, we discovered that GNU binutils 2.17 has a nasty bug in the linker that causes excessive link time when building llvm. We switched to using cvs binutils and our link times went from minutes to seconds. I didn't see anything about this on the web pages. It might be good information to add to the Getting Started guide. -Dave

Hello, I have a very early version of GNU's ld, part of GNU binutils, with LLVM's Link Time Optimization integrated with it. This allows the linker to link LLVM bytecode and native objects together into a single executable. It is still very early in development, and I'll be working on doing more robust testing on it in the upcoming weeks, but it at least handles simple cases. If you

Hi, :If I compile this file with debugging enabled (clang/LLVM TOT) int main() { } I get the error Error: inconsistent uses of .cfi_sections From the 2.27 binutils assemblers. It seems that 2.27 doesn't like the .cfi_sections .debug_frame directive following previous .cfi directives. The assemblers seem to be happy if the .cfi_sections directive precedes any other .cfi directive. Is

Hello! I have encountered a problem when building shared klibc with recent binutils versions - apparently the breakage happened since binutils 2.17.50.0.2 due to the following change: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2006-05/msg00279.html http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-05/msg00466.html --- a/binutils/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c +++ b/binutils/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c @@ -3630,7 +3630,8 @@ static

Thanks for the reply Eli. I have the same version of gcc/binutils as my system gcc/binutils And it gets built without any errors with them. --- On Thu, 5/13/10, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > From: Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Building llvm using non-system gcc/binutils > To: "john blair"

I am trying to build llvm-2.7 using non-system gcc/binutils. My gcc version is 4.1.2, and binutils is 2.17.50.0.15. I get the following errors `.L2438' referenced in section `.gnu.linkonce.r._ZNK4llvm16DAGTypeLegalizer13getTypeActionENS_3EVTE' of /build/toolchain/src/llvm-2.7/objdir/Release/lib/libLLVMSelectionDAG.a(LegalizeTypes.o): defined in discarded section

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 12:28 PM, john blair <mailtome200420032002 at yahoo.com> wrote: > I am trying to build llvm-2.7 using non-system gcc/binutils. My gcc version is 4.1.2, and binutils is 2.17.50.0.15. I get the following errors That version of gcc is known to have issues building LLVM; see http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#brokengcc . Try upgrading your gcc version. -Eli

On 13.02.2016 10:01, Ady via Syslinux wrote: > >>> Yes, it is a bug in ld. I have been working with H.J. and we have just tracked it down. >>> >> >> >> It seems that hjl helped, after all. >> >> Syslinux built, or better to write, linked with: >> binutils 2.26.51.20160212 git 95c00d1 is salt-n-pepa. >> >> Both, ISOLINUX and

Hello everyone, My name is Sebastiaan Peters, an undergrad student from The Netherlands. The project for creating drop-in replacements for GNU Binutils peaked my interest. It would make my day (or my summer) being able to contribute to such a project. Since I have no experience with llvm besides some basic usage of clang, the first thing I tried was to find out what llvm tools are out there.

Hi all ! During this GSoC, I've worked on improving the llvm binutils suite. I've wrote a final [1]report for those of you who would be interested. Regards, -- Paul Semel [1] http://paulsemel.org/posts/command-line-replacements-in-llvm-binutils/

On February 11, 2016 11:30:02 PM PST, poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote: >... >http://repo.or.cz/syslinux.git/commit/8750016 > >Booting from DVD/CD... > >ISOLINUX 6.04 ETCD >and then hangs > >ttyS0 debug shows single line: >_malloc(24, 0, 2) @ 0x00104bab = > > >$ ld --version >GNU ld version 2.26.20160125 >... >$ gcc --version >gcc

Hi, unfortunately, my build somehow hangs when linking clang binary and my system is in an unusable state. My toolchain is clang-3.8, gold-1.11 and LLVMgold.so from binutils v2.26.1 (both selfmade) and LTO-flag is enabled. My buildsystem uses cmake-3.6.0 and ninja-1.7.1 (both prebuilt). I have 52 last steps left in my 3rd build. My Linux-kernel is v3.13.0-92 from official Ubuntu repositories.

Hello, Jon > To make it easier to use the LLVM-GCC MinGW32 binary and meet your GPL licensing requirements, could you embed the MinGW binutils binary as-is in the LLVM-GCC MinGW32 and update the LLVM docs to point to the MinGW SourceForge download site for those wanting the MinGW binutils source? I still don't think it's good idea. binutils will add something like 10Mb to package

Hi Sebastiaan, I'm not the creator of the this GSOC project but I might be able to help. I'm the author of llvm-objcopy, and the soon to be creator of the symlink llvm-strip to llvm-objcopy (which currently doesn't exist). The reason llvm-objcopy and llvm-strip don't have documentation pages is because I haven't written them yet; I'll get on that! 1. The goal is to work

Hi Eli, I tried to build llvm with gcc-4.4.3 and binutils-2.20.1. This time it failed with /build/toolchain/src/llvm-2.7/objdir/Release/bin/tblgen: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found (required by /build/toolchain/src/llvm-2.7/objdir/Release/bin/tblgen) make[1]: *** [/build/toolchain/src/llvm-2.7/objdir/lib/VMCore/Release/Intrinsics.gen.tmp] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2017:0891 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-0891.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 522137f6ad927defa29d622f9c898b15cfcb831bc9540a744cc633ce592029d4 binutils-2.20.51.0.2-5.47.el6_9.1.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2019:0413 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0413 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: afa661d760a4ac97a7959ca7949a626b96f4a406b3bbfedc60eba4d767c635cf binutils-2.20.51.0.2-5.48.el6_10.1.i686.rpm

Hi, I tried to compile wine and got the message: ... check if it is possible to make a Libary... no *** If you use Linux *** you need a newer binutils *** cause of the shared libs so I looked for newer binutils, and tried to complie them: binutils-2.9.5.0.37 configure, make, make install but wine gives me the same message :( The next idea was, to replace the ld... with newer one. But when I