Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "bind_version_9_8".
2012 Aug 22
2
Samba4 successful deployment
I've just installed samba4 beta 7 with defaults and everything went OK.
As I download bind9.9.1 tarball and compiled it I had to follow steve's
advice:
to declare we'll be using DLZ_DLOPEN_VERSION 2 in
/samba-master/source4/dns_server/dlz_minimal.h
/*#ifdef BIND_VERSION_9_8
#define DLZ_DLOPEN_VERSION 1
#else
#define DLZ_DLOPEN_VERSION 2
#endif
*/
#define DLZ_DLOPEN_VERSION 2
I commented the first block and then added the second block explicitly to
avoid a message complaining about DLZ_DLOPEN_VERSION.
GPOs seem to be working OK.
DNS secure automatic updates are work...
2013 Jun 03
1
Removed bind 9.8 installed bind 9.9 now named will not start with samba include statement: dlz_bind9_9.so incorrect version 2 should be 1!?
I removed the centos bind build and installed bind 9.9.3 from ISC source,
and went to /usr/local/samba/private/named.conf and changed the line from
bind 9.8 to bind 9.9 and now I get this error and named will not start with
the include line for samba in /etc/named.conf:
get: "dlz_dlopen: incorrect version 2 should be 1 in
'/usr/local/samba/lib/bind9/dlz_bind9_9.so'"
Help!