search for: bind9_9

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "bind9_9".

Did you mean: bind9.9
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
...#39;], shell=True, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.STDOUT, cwd='.').communicate()[0] bind_info = get_string(bind_info) bind9_8 = '#' bind9_9 = '#' bind9_10 = '#' bind9_11 = '#' bind9_12 = '#' bind9_14 = '#' bind9_16 = '#' bind9_18 = '#' if bind_info.upper().find('BIND 9.8') != -1: bind9_8 = '...
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
...??????????????????????????????? stdout=subprocess.PIPE, > ???????????????????????????????????? stderr=subprocess.STDOUT, > ???????????????????????????????????? cwd='.').communicate()[0] > ??????? bind_info = get_string(bind_info) > ??????? bind9_8 = '#' > ??????? bind9_9 = '#' > ??????? bind9_10 = '#' > ??????? bind9_11 = '#' > ??????? bind9_12 = '#' > ??????? bind9_14 = '#' > ??????? bind9_16 = '#' > ??????? bind9_18 = '#' > ??????? if bind_info.upper().find('BIND 9.8') !=...
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
...??????????? stdout=subprocess.PIPE, >> ????????????????????????????????????? stderr=subprocess.STDOUT, >> ????????????????????????????????????? cwd='.').communicate()[0] >> ???????? bind_info = get_string(bind_info) >> ???????? bind9_8 = '#' >> ???????? bind9_9 = '#' >> ???????? bind9_10 = '#' >> ???????? bind9_11 = '#' >> ???????? bind9_12 = '#' >> ???????? bind9_14 = '#' >> ???????? bind9_16 = '#' >> ???????? bind9_18 = '#' >> ???????? if bind_info.upper()....
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
...9;], shell=True, >>> ????????????????????????????????????? stdout=subprocess.PIPE, >>> stderr=subprocess.STDOUT, >>> cwd='.').communicate()[0] >>> ???????? bind_info = get_string(bind_info) >>> ???????? bind9_8 = '#' >>> ???????? bind9_9 = '#' >>> ???????? bind9_10 = '#' >>> ???????? bind9_11 = '#' >>> ???????? bind9_12 = '#' >>> ???????? bind9_14 = '#' >>> ???????? bind9_16 = '#' >>> ???????? bind9_18 = '#' >>> ??...
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
...;>> ????????????????????????????????????? stdout=subprocess.PIPE, >>>> stderr=subprocess.STDOUT, >>>> cwd='.').communicate()[0] >>>> ???????? bind_info = get_string(bind_info) >>>> ???????? bind9_8 = '#' >>>> ???????? bind9_9 = '#' >>>> ???????? bind9_10 = '#' >>>> ???????? bind9_11 = '#' >>>> ???????? bind9_12 = '#' >>>> ???????? bind9_14 = '#' >>>> ???????? bind9_16 = '#' >>>> ???????? bind9_18 = ...
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
On 16/01/2023 16:56, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > Hi to all, > Is there a known problem when using Debian 11 together with the samba > packages from the backports (4.17.4) and the bind9 from the backports > (9.18). With me it comes on each further Domaincontroller to errors with > the "samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names". > > If I install Bind9 in version
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
...=True, >>>>> stdout=subprocess.PIPE, >>>>> stderr=subprocess.STDOUT, >>>>> cwd='.').communicate()[0] >>>>> ???????? bind_info = get_string(bind_info) >>>>> ???????? bind9_8 = '#' >>>>> ???????? bind9_9 = '#' >>>>> ???????? bind9_10 = '#' >>>>> ???????? bind9_11 = '#' >>>>> ???????? bind9_12 = '#' >>>>> ???????? bind9_14 = '#' >>>>> ???????? bind9_16 = '#' >>>>>...
2020 Sep 10
1
AD-DC with DLZ using Bind9.16.x
...This configures dynamically loadable zones (DLZ) from AD schema # Uncomment only single database line, depending on your BIND version # dlz "AD DNS Zone" { # For BIND 9.8.x ${BIND9_8} database "dlopen ${MODULESDIR}/bind9/dlz_bind9.so"; # For BIND 9.9.x ${BIND9_9} database "dlopen ${MODULESDIR}/bind9/dlz_bind9_9.so"; # For BIND 9.10.x ${BIND9_10} database "dlopen ${MODULESDIR}/bind9/dlz_bind9_10.so"; # For BIND 9.11.x ${BIND9_11} database "dlopen ${MODULESDIR}/bind9/dlz_bind9_11.so"; # For BIND 9....