Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "bind9_18".
Did you mean:
bind9_11
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
...;.').communicate()[0]
bind_info = get_string(bind_info)
bind9_8 = '#'
bind9_9 = '#'
bind9_10 = '#'
bind9_11 = '#'
bind9_12 = '#'
bind9_14 = '#'
bind9_16 = '#'
bind9_18 = '#'
if bind_info.upper().find('BIND 9.8') != -1:
bind9_8 = ''
elif bind_info.upper().find('BIND 9.9') != -1:
bind9_9 = ''
elif bind_info.upper().find('BIND 9.10') != -1:
bind9_10 = ...
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
...info = get_string(bind_info)
> ??????? bind9_8 = '#'
> ??????? bind9_9 = '#'
> ??????? bind9_10 = '#'
> ??????? bind9_11 = '#'
> ??????? bind9_12 = '#'
> ??????? bind9_14 = '#'
> ??????? bind9_16 = '#'
> ??????? bind9_18 = '#'
> ??????? if bind_info.upper().find('BIND 9.8') != -1:
> ??????????? bind9_8 = ''
> ??????? elif bind_info.upper().find('BIND 9.9') != -1:
> ??????????? bind9_9 = ''
> ??????? elif bind_info.upper().find('BIND 9.10') != -1:
&...
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
...;> ???????? bind9_8 = '#'
>> ???????? bind9_9 = '#'
>> ???????? bind9_10 = '#'
>> ???????? bind9_11 = '#'
>> ???????? bind9_12 = '#'
>> ???????? bind9_14 = '#'
>> ???????? bind9_16 = '#'
>> ???????? bind9_18 = '#'
>> ???????? if bind_info.upper().find('BIND 9.8') != -1:
>> ???????????? bind9_8 = ''
>> ???????? elif bind_info.upper().find('BIND 9.9') != -1:
>> ???????????? bind9_9 = ''
>> ???????? elif bind_info.upper().find('BIND...
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
Hi Stefan,
I have exact that running: Samba 4.17.4 and bind 9.18 from the
bullseye-backports.
I my case "samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names" runs without any errors.
As like 9.16 I use the "dlz_bind9_18.so" entry in named.conf.
If you need further information to compare just ask.
Regards
Ingo
https://github.com/WAdama
Rowland Penny via samba schrieb am 16.01.2023 um 20:05:
>
>
> On 16/01/2023 18:56, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 16/01/2023 18:27, Ste...
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
...a 4.17.4 and bind 9.18 from the
> bullseye-backports.
>
> I my case "samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names" runs without any errors.
>
On the first DC it's running like I expacted, but on the second one I'm
having the provlem.
> As like 9.16 I use the "dlz_bind9_18.so" entry in named.conf.
>
> If you need further information to compare just ask.
>
> Regards
> Ingo
> https://github.com/WAdama
>
> Rowland Penny via samba schrieb am 16.01.2023 um 20:05:
>>
>>
>> On 16/01/2023 18:56, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:...
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
On 16/01/2023 16:56, Stefan Kania via samba wrote:
> Hi to all,
> Is there a known problem when using Debian 11 together with the samba
> packages from the backports (4.17.4) and the bind9 from the backports
> (9.18). With me it comes on each further Domaincontroller to errors with
> the "samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names".
>
> If I install Bind9 in version
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
...bullseye-backports.
>>
>> I my case "samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names" runs without any
>> errors.
>>
> On the first DC it's running like I expacted, but on the second one
> I'm having the provlem.
>
>> As like 9.16 I use the "dlz_bind9_18.so" entry in named.conf.
>>
>> If you need further information to compare just ask.
>>
>> Regards
>> Ingo
>> https://github.com/WAdama
>>
>> Rowland Penny via samba schrieb am 16.01.2023 um 20:05:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16/01/2...