Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "bind9_12".
Did you mean:
bind9_11
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
...stderr=subprocess.STDOUT,
cwd='.').communicate()[0]
bind_info = get_string(bind_info)
bind9_8 = '#'
bind9_9 = '#'
bind9_10 = '#'
bind9_11 = '#'
bind9_12 = '#'
bind9_14 = '#'
bind9_16 = '#'
bind9_18 = '#'
if bind_info.upper().find('BIND 9.8') != -1:
bind9_8 = ''
elif bind_info.upper().find('BIND 9.9') != -1:
bind9_9 = '&...
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
...rocess.STDOUT,
> ???????????????????????????????????? cwd='.').communicate()[0]
> ??????? bind_info = get_string(bind_info)
> ??????? bind9_8 = '#'
> ??????? bind9_9 = '#'
> ??????? bind9_10 = '#'
> ??????? bind9_11 = '#'
> ??????? bind9_12 = '#'
> ??????? bind9_14 = '#'
> ??????? bind9_16 = '#'
> ??????? bind9_18 = '#'
> ??????? if bind_info.upper().find('BIND 9.8') != -1:
> ??????????? bind9_8 = ''
> ??????? elif bind_info.upper().find('BIND 9.9') != -1:...
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
...????????????????????????????????? cwd='.').communicate()[0]
>> ???????? bind_info = get_string(bind_info)
>> ???????? bind9_8 = '#'
>> ???????? bind9_9 = '#'
>> ???????? bind9_10 = '#'
>> ???????? bind9_11 = '#'
>> ???????? bind9_12 = '#'
>> ???????? bind9_14 = '#'
>> ???????? bind9_16 = '#'
>> ???????? bind9_18 = '#'
>> ???????? if bind_info.upper().find('BIND 9.8') != -1:
>> ???????????? bind9_8 = ''
>> ???????? elif bind_info.upper().find(...
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
...;>> cwd='.').communicate()[0]
>>> ???????? bind_info = get_string(bind_info)
>>> ???????? bind9_8 = '#'
>>> ???????? bind9_9 = '#'
>>> ???????? bind9_10 = '#'
>>> ???????? bind9_11 = '#'
>>> ???????? bind9_12 = '#'
>>> ???????? bind9_14 = '#'
>>> ???????? bind9_16 = '#'
>>> ???????? bind9_18 = '#'
>>> ???????? if bind_info.upper().find('BIND 9.8') != -1:
>>> ???????????? bind9_8 = ''
>>> ???????? elif b...
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
...;).communicate()[0]
>>>> ???????? bind_info = get_string(bind_info)
>>>> ???????? bind9_8 = '#'
>>>> ???????? bind9_9 = '#'
>>>> ???????? bind9_10 = '#'
>>>> ???????? bind9_11 = '#'
>>>> ???????? bind9_12 = '#'
>>>> ???????? bind9_14 = '#'
>>>> ???????? bind9_16 = '#'
>>>> ???????? bind9_18 = '#'
>>>> ???????? if bind_info.upper().find('BIND 9.8') != -1:
>>>> ???????????? bind9_8 = ''
>>...
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
On 16/01/2023 16:56, Stefan Kania via samba wrote:
> Hi to all,
> Is there a known problem when using Debian 11 together with the samba
> packages from the backports (4.17.4) and the bind9 from the backports
> (9.18). With me it comes on each further Domaincontroller to errors with
> the "samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names".
>
> If I install Bind9 in version
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
...>>>> ???????? bind_info = get_string(bind_info)
>>>>> ???????? bind9_8 = '#'
>>>>> ???????? bind9_9 = '#'
>>>>> ???????? bind9_10 = '#'
>>>>> ???????? bind9_11 = '#'
>>>>> ???????? bind9_12 = '#'
>>>>> ???????? bind9_14 = '#'
>>>>> ???????? bind9_16 = '#'
>>>>> ???????? bind9_18 = '#'
>>>>> ???????? if bind_info.upper().find('BIND 9.8') != -1:
>>>>> ???????????? bind9_8 =...
2020 Sep 10
1
AD-DC with DLZ using Bind9.16.x
...quot;dlopen ${MODULESDIR}/bind9/dlz_bind9_9.so";
# For BIND 9.10.x
${BIND9_10} database "dlopen ${MODULESDIR}/bind9/dlz_bind9_10.so";
# For BIND 9.11.x
${BIND9_11} database "dlopen ${MODULESDIR}/bind9/dlz_bind9_11.so";
# For BIND 9.12.x
${BIND9_12} database "dlopen ${MODULESDIR}/bind9/dlz_bind9_12.so";
};
Carlos