search for: bind10

...lled. How do you configure it? Does it need anything > special in the config for samba to build the ...samba.../named.conf > file that I should be able to include in my /etc/named.conf > afterwards? With Fedora being a bit 'bleeding edge', I just wondered if they had started using Bind10, but 9.11 should be okay, Samba knows all about that version ;-) > > My guess is that some directory is missing. But if I start fresh and > configure samba with the internal dns it gets all the way through it's > configuration with no errors. Not sure, all I can tell you is what...

...? Does it need anything > > special in the config for samba to build the ...samba.../named.conf > > file that I should be able to include in my /etc/named.conf > > afterwards? > > With Fedora being a bit 'bleeding edge', I just wondered if they had > started using Bind10, but 9.11 should be okay, Samba knows all about > that version ;-) > > > > > My guess is that some directory is missing. But if I start fresh and > > configure samba with the internal dns it gets all the way through it's > > configuration with no errors. > >...

...l in the config for samba to build the ...samba.../named.conf >>> > file that I should be able to include in my /etc/named.conf >>> > afterwards? >>> >>> With Fedora being a bit 'bleeding edge', I just wondered if they had >>> started using Bind10, but 9.11 should be okay, Samba knows all about >>> that version ;-) >>> >>> > >>> > My guess is that some directory is missing. But if I start fresh and >>> > configure samba with the internal dns it gets all the way through it's >>&...

Bind-9.11 is installed. How do you configure it? Does it need anything special in the config for samba to build the ...samba.../named.conf file that I should be able to include in my /etc/named.conf afterwards? My guess is that some directory is missing. But if I start fresh and configure samba with the internal dns it gets all the way through it's configuration with no errors. I've

.....samba.../named.conf >>>>> > file that I should be able to include in my /etc/named.conf >>>>> > afterwards? >>>>> >>>>> With Fedora being a bit 'bleeding edge', I just wondered if they had >>>>> started using Bind10, but 9.11 should be okay, Samba knows all about >>>>> that version ;-) >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> > My guess is that some directory is missing. But if I start fresh and >>>>> > configure samba with the internal dns it get...

...>> > special in the config for samba to build the ...samba.../named.conf >> > file that I should be able to include in my /etc/named.conf >> > afterwards? >> >> With Fedora being a bit 'bleeding edge', I just wondered if they had >> started using Bind10, but 9.11 should be okay, Samba knows all about >> that version ;-) >> >> > >> > My guess is that some directory is missing. But if I start fresh and >> > configure samba with the internal dns it gets all the way through it's >> > configuration w...

...samba to build the ...samba.../named.conf >>>> > file that I should be able to include in my /etc/named.conf >>>> > afterwards? >>>> >>>> With Fedora being a bit 'bleeding edge', I just wondered if they had >>>> started using Bind10, but 9.11 should be okay, Samba knows all about >>>> that version ;-) >>>> >>>> > >>>> > My guess is that some directory is missing. But if I start fresh and >>>> > configure samba with the internal dns it gets all the way throug...

...f >>>>>> > file that I should be able to include in my /etc/named.conf >>>>>> > afterwards? >>>>>> >>>>>> With Fedora being a bit 'bleeding edge', I just wondered if they had >>>>>> started using Bind10, but 9.11 should be okay, Samba knows all about >>>>>> that version ;-) >>>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>>> > My guess is that some directory is missing. But if I start fresh >>>>>> and >>>>>> >...