Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "binarypredicate".
2011 Mar 09
2
[LLVMdev] MSVC compiling issue
...very bad
idea).
> I hoped the symmetric methods would be enough to trick MSVC into compiling it.
Does that mean, that gcc actually only needs
bool operator()(const LiveRange&A, SlotIndex B) ?
According to C++(2003) 25.0.0.8 the answer is "yes", however that
section talks about BinaryPredicate and not Compare. The standard is
rather unclear at this point and I'm going over to comp.std.c++ to ask.
Best regards
Olaf Krzikalla
2011 Mar 09
0
[LLVMdev] MSVC compiling issue
...would be enough to trick MSVC into compiling it.
> Does that mean, that gcc actually only needs
>
> bool operator()(const LiveRange&A, SlotIndex B) ?
Actually, the other way around.
> According to C++(2003) 25.0.0.8 the answer is "yes", however that section talks about BinaryPredicate and not Compare. The standard is rather unclear at this point and I'm going over to comp.std.c++ to ask.
Howard Hinnant was kind enough to clarify this a while back.
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2010-August/010379.html
>
2011 Mar 08
0
[LLVMdev] MSVC compiling issue
On Mar 8, 2011, at 1:07 AM, Olaf Krzikalla wrote:
> Hi @llvm,
>
> building a debug version under MSVC 9 leads to a compiler error due to a
> mix of different types in a call to upper_bound. I have attached a
> hot-fix but I'm rather unsure if it should be applied as it is, since
> IMHO the reason is a MSVC library bug ("IMHO", because I don't know the
>
2011 Mar 12
1
[LLVMdev] MSVC compiling issue
...VC into compiling it.
>> Does that mean, that gcc actually only needs
>>
>> bool operator()(const LiveRange&A, SlotIndex B) ?
>
> Actually, the other way around.
>
>> According to C++(2003) 25.0.0.8 the answer is "yes", however that section talks about BinaryPredicate and not Compare. The standard is rather unclear at this point and I'm going over to comp.std.c++ to ask.
>
> Howard Hinnant was kind enough to clarify this a while back.
>
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2010-August/010379.html
>>
>
>
>
> _____________...
2011 Mar 08
4
[LLVMdev] MSVC compiling issue
Hi @llvm,
building a debug version under MSVC 9 leads to a compiler error due to a
mix of different types in a call to upper_bound. I have attached a
hot-fix but I'm rather unsure if it should be applied as it is, since
IMHO the reason is a MSVC library bug ("IMHO", because I don't know the
requirements imposed to the predicate by the standard).
Best regards
Olaf Krzikalla