search for: bin_path

I am evaluating RubyMine but am getting the following rake issue... C:/Ruby192/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:340:in `bin_path'': can''t find executable rake for rake-0.8.7 (Gem::Exception) There are many web pages (through Google) that discuss this, and several recommend applying a patch and link to a .patch file (0001-version-bundled-gems-during-installation.patch). This file opens in TortoiseUDiff but t...

...map quote initrd_binaries)) in + if verbose () then eprintf "%s\n%!" cmd; + if Sys.command cmd <> 0 then + failwith "cpio command failed"; + + (* See if any of the binaries were present in the output. *) + let rec loop = function + | bin :: bins -> + let bin_path = tmpdir // bin in + if is_regular_file bin_path then ( + let out = command "file" ["-zb"; bin_path] in + file_architecture_of_magic out orig_path bin_path + ) + else + loop bins + | [] -> + failwithf "could not determin...

...Failed to build gem native extension. rake RUBYARCHDIR=/home/kadoudal/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2- p180@rails3/gems/ffi-1.0.7/lib RUBYLIBDIR=/home/kadoudal/.rvm/gems/ ruby-1.9.2-p180@rails3/gems/ffi-1.0.7/lib /home/kadoudal/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.9.1/ rubygems.rb:388:in `bin_path'': can''t find gem rake ([">= 0"]) with executable rake (Gem::GemNotFoundException) from /home/kadoudal/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180/bin/rake:19:in `<main>'' need some clue to try solving this issue ... -- You received this message because you are subscri...

Hello I am new to ruby on rails and trying to get it going on a windows machine However when I try to run the rake task it always fail with the following error message C:/Ruby192/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:340:in `bin_path'': can''t find executable rake for rake-0.8.7 (Gem::Exception) from C:/Ruby192/bin/rake:19:in `<main>'' and I am not quite sure what I should do to fix it... Thank you in Advance Jon W -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message beca...

...N --------------- Notice that the IP is 0.0.0.0 instead of 127.0.0.1 also, the Syntax Error ------------------------- C:\Downloads\Ruby on Rails\rubygems-1.3.5\rubygems-1.3.5>setup.rb RubyGems 1.3.5 installed === 1.3.5 / 2009-07-21 Bug fixes: * Fix use of prerelease gems. * Gem.bin_path no longer escapes path with spaces. Bug #25935 and #26458. Deprecation Notices: * Bulk index update is no longer supported (the code currently remains, but not the tests) * Gem::manage_gems was removed in 1.3.3. * Time::today was removed in 1.3.3. ---------------------------------------------...

...but I am getting this error when I browse the application from the browser. script/server => Booting WEBrick => Rails 2.3.5 application starting on http://0.0.0.0:3000 Sphinx cannot be found on your system. You may need to configure the following settings in your config/sphinx.yml file: * bin_path * searchd_binary_name * indexer_binary_name For more information, read the documentation: http://freelancing-god.github.com/ts/en/advanced_config.html => Call with -d to detach => Ctrl-C to shutdown server [2010-01-16 20:29:49] INFO WEBrick 1.3.1 [2010-01-16 20:29:49] INFO ruby 1.8.7 (...

...I typed "rails generate scaffold User name:string email:string" command in terminal to generata resources. And, I have typed "rake db:migrate" to build Ruby. Then, I got an error stating: "/Users/taek/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p290/lib/ ruby/site_ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:314:in `bin_path'': can''t find gem rake ([">= 0"]) with executable rake (Gem::GemNotFoundException) from /Users/taek/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/bin/rake:19:in `<main>''" When I googled, some posts suggested to delete rake.gemspec(in "/Users/ taek/.rvm/rubies...

Previously posted as part of the mega utilities/inspection series here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00232.html What I've done is to extract just the parts related to rewriting daemon APIs in OCaml, rebase them on top of the current master, fix a few things, and recompile and test everything. Rich.

Version 1 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00003.html This patch series reimplements a few more APIs in OCaml, including some very important core APIs like ?list_filesystems? and ?mount?. All the tests pass after this. The selection of APIs that I have moved may look a little random, but in fact they are all APIs consumed by the inspection code (and some more

v2 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00008.html This series gets as far as a working (and faster) reimplementation of ‘guestfs_list_filesystems’. I also have another patch series on top of this one which reimplements the inspection APIs inside the daemon, but that needs a bit more work still, since inspection turns out to be a very large piece of code. Rich.

I think this fixes everything mentioned: - Added the Optgroups module as suggested. - Remove command temporary files. - Replace command ~flags with ?fold_stdout_on_stderr. - Nest _with_mounted function. - Rebase & retest. Rich.

v1 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html This series now depends on two small patches which I posted separately: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00207.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00209.html v1 -> v2: - Previously changes to generator/daemon.ml were made incrementally through the patch

This is a combination of: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00046.html [PATCH 00/12] Refactor utility functions. plus: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00023.html [PATCH v3 00/19] Allow APIs to be implemented in OCaml. with the second patches rebased on top of the utility refactoring, and some other adjustments and extensions. This passes

v6 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00103.html and this requires the utilities refactoring posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html Inspection is now complete[*], although not very well tested. I'm intending to compare the output of many guests using old & new virt-inspector to see if I can find any

v5: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00065.html Since v5, this now implements inspection almost completely for Linux and Windows guests. Rich.

v7 was: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00184.html I believe this addresses all comments received so far. Also it now passes a test where I compared about 100 disk images processed with old and new virt-inspector binaries. The output is identical in all cases except one which is caused by a bug in blkid