Displaying 20 results from an estimated 159 matches for "bignums".
Did you mean:
bignum
2007 Aug 14
1
[LLVMdev] Static functions for APInt
...d tcAnd(integerPart *, const integerPart *, unsigned int);
+ static void tcOr(integerPart *, const integerPart *, unsigned int);
+ static void tcXor(integerPart *, const integerPart *, unsigned int);
+ static void tcComplement(integerPart *, unsigned int);
+
+ /// Comparison (unsigned) of two bignums.
+ static int tcCompare(const integerPart *, const integerPart *,
+ unsigned int);
+
+ /// Increment a bignum in-place. Return the carry flag.
+ static integerPart tcIncrement(integerPart *, unsigned int);
+
+ /// Set the least significant BITS and clear the rest.
+ static void tcSetL...
2013 Nov 02
3
[PATCH] curve25519-sha256@libssh.org key exchange proposal
...>> 3) Matthew's public domain reference implementation.
>>
>> i'd vote for #3
>
> Yes, me too.
>
> One thing: this patch will be incompatible with Aris' since we calculate
> the hash over the DH values encoded as strings rather than (as he does)
> bignums.
>
> IMO they should be strings because they aren't ever sent as bignums on
> the wire, but if the Curve25519 support is widely deployed then it might
> be too late to change. I don't think the encoding makes any appreciable
> difference to security - the bignum encoding is...
2012 May 16
2
where is the struct RSA defined??
In the source code of openssh(my source code is 6.0 for Openbsd??
The content below is Rsa.h
#ifndef RSA_H
#define RSA_H
#include <openssl/bn.h>
#include <openssl/rsa.h>
void rsa_public_encrypt(BIGNUM *, BIGNUM *, RSA *);
int rsa_private_decrypt(BIGNUM *, BIGNUM *, RSA *);
void rsa_generate_additional_parameters(RSA *);
#endif /* RSA_H */
Question:
2010 Jun 11
4
[LLVMdev] Bignum development
Hi all,
After searching for a decent compiler backend for ages (google
sometimes isn't helpful), I recently stumbled upon LLVM. Woot!!
I work on bignum arithmetic (I'm a professional mathematician) and
have recently decided to switch from developing GPL'd bignum code to
BSD licensed code. (See http://www.mpir.org/ which I contributed to
for a while - a fork of GMP).
Please bear with
2010 Jun 12
0
[LLVMdev] Bignum development
On 12 June 2010 00:51, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Bill Hart <goodwillhart at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Eli,
>>
>> On 11 June 2010 22:44, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Bill Hart <goodwillhart at googlemail.com> wrote:
2007 May 03
1
[ win32utils-Bugs-10555 ] wait call in while loop generate "bignum too big to convert into long" error
Bugs item #10555, was opened at 2007-05-03 11:48
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=411&aid=10555&group_id=85
Category: win32-changejournal
Group: Code
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Dong Zhang (dzhang)
Assigned to: Park Heesob (phasis68)
Summary: wait call in while loop generate "bignum too big to convert into
2009 May 27
2
problem with centos upgrade
Dear All,
I have a centos 5 server running my mail and Dns working fine
but when i try to do u yum ugrade or yum update it gives me lots of perl
errors and it terminates
OS is centos 5 (final)
the part of errors reported
---------------------------------
file /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Math/BigFloat.pm from install of
perl-5.8.8-18.el5_3.1 conflicts with file from package
perl-Math-BigInt-1.86-1
2007 Sep 10
1
[ win32utils-Bugs-13825 ] /win32-file-stat-1.2.5/lib/win32/file/stat.rb:81:in `at'': bignum too big to convert into `long'' (RangeError)
Bugs item #13825, was opened at 2007-09-10 16:04
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=411&aid=13825&group_id=85
Category: win32-file-stat
Group: Code
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Nobody (None)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: /win32-file-stat-1.2.5/lib/win32/file/stat.rb:81:in `at'': bignum too big to
2010 Jun 11
3
[LLVMdev] Bignum development
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Bill Hart <goodwillhart at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi Eli,
>
> On 11 June 2010 22:44, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Bill Hart <goodwillhart at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> a) What plans are there to support addition, subtraction,
>>> multiplication, division,
2007 Aug 14
0
[ win32utils-Bugs-10555 ] wait call in while loop generate "bignum too big to convert into long" error
Bugs item #10555, was opened at 2007-05-03 09:48
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=411&aid=10555&group_id=85
Category: win32-changejournal
Group: Code
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Dong Zhang (dzhang)
Assigned to: Park Heesob (phasis68)
>Summary: wait call in while loop generate "bignum too big to convert
2001 Feb 08
1
ssh1 keyexchange problem ?
Hi,
Has anybody produced diffs for openssh-2.3.0p1 for the rsa keyexchange
problem that Core-SDI described ? ( I noticed that fix is already
in openbsd tree ).
-Jarno
--
Jarno Huuskonen - System Administrator | Jarno.Huuskonen at uku.fi
University of Kuopio - Computer Center | Work: +358 17 162822
PO BOX 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland | Mobile: +358 40 5388169
2009 Aug 17
2
passenger - bignum too big to convert into `long'
I have a very strange problem and can''t seem to figure it out.
I have passenger 2.2.4 and apache 2.2 running a rails application.
It ran fine for weeks when I decided to update Apache. I might also have
messed with the users on this machine (OS X 10.5)
Now when I start it, Apache starts up fine, loads passenger, and
everything looks good.
Then, after a while ( and I don''t
2006 Oct 17
0
TypeError (can't convert Bignum into Hash):
This error has been driving me nuts. It happens with no regularity or
pattern and causes a 500 App error. Refreshing will always display as
normal (http 200)
The back trace always starts with
TypeError (can''t convert Bignum into Hash):
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.14.4/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/mysql_adapter.rb:342:in
`update''
2010 Jun 12
0
[LLVMdev] Bignum development
>> There are obviously numerous ways we might use LLVM to aid development
>> of "bsdnt". I'll keep exploring those options. It sounds like, for the
>> time being, analysing existing code output and looking for ways to
>> improve it on certain arches is perhaps one way we may be of
>> assistance.
>
> Sounds like an interesting project. We're
2015 Feb 19
3
[PATCH] Unbreak compilation with --without-ssh1
Hi,
Patch attached for $SUBJECT.
ismail
2008 Oct 08
0
RangeError (bignum too big to convert into `long'
I have written the following function in RoR for my website . The
function on execution gives an error for the Rmagick crop method , the
error is wriiten after the function . I am using the same
function(except for the change in name, rest everything is same) for
cropping from left , right and bottom and they are working fine.
All the left , right , top and bottomcrop functions are given the same
2010 Jun 12
3
[LLVMdev] Bignum development
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Bill Hart <goodwillhart at googlemail.com> wrote:
> What is i1? Sorry for the really daft question. These short
> abbreviations are sometimes hard to look up.....
1-bit integer; in practice, usually used like a boolean, although it
supports the full complement of integer operations.
>> There have really only been sporadic queries about practical
2011 Mar 30
1
[LLVMdev] Bignums
...ort, and I wanted to try LLVM
as an apparently simpler and more portable system to my current design
(a Haskell script which spits out mixed C and assembly). Porting the
script to use the LLVM bindings instead of the current hack was pretty
easy. But I have a few remaining questions:
(1) Are bignums exposed to any higher-level language? It would be nice
to be able to write all the code in C and compile it with Clang... but I
need 256-bit integer support.
(2) Is there a way to convince LLVM's register allocator to do the right
thing on x86? I'm getting swaths of code like:...
2008 Sep 08
0
[LLVMdev] Integer questions
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote:
> FYI, there is one other issue here, PR2660. While codegen in
> general can handle types like i256, individual targets don't always
> have calling convention rules to cover them. For example, returning
> an i128 on x86-32 or an i256 on x86-64 doesn't doesn't fit in the
> registers designated
2008 Sep 08
2
[LLVMdev] Integer questions
On Sep 5, 2008, at 3:07 PM, Duncan Sands wrote:
> The current maximum the code generators support is i256. If you try
> to
> use bigger integers it will work fine in the bitcode, but if you try
> to do code generation the compiler will crash.
FYI, there is one other issue here, PR2660. While codegen in
general can handle types like i256, individual targets don't always
have