search for: biginteger

I am unable to install the gmp package on an x86_64 (Xeon) machine. I have had the same problem with other packages (eg. MCMCpack) as well. I am running Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4.1. I get the following error: g++ -shared -L/usr/local/lib64 -o gmp.so biginteger.o biginteger_operator.o bigintegerR.o bigrational.o bigrational_operator.o bigrationalR.o factor.o -L/usr/local/lib/ -lgmp /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/3.4.3/libstdc++.a(functexcept.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 against `std::bad_exception::~bad_exception()' can not be used when m...

Dear all, gmp package is now available on cran with version 0.4 Aim of gmp is to provide a lot a function to manipulate big integers, big rationals and last but not least big integers in Z/nZ (modulo n) We add in last version support for matrix computation (standards operators, + * - / %*% ...) and inversion matrix (solve): in Z/nZ if matrix defined in Z/nZ with rationals (absolute precision)

...I've been looking to LLVM, in order to develop a compiler for a cryptography oriented language. I started by following the tutorials on Kaleidoscope, and I must say they were very usefull. Now I need to use GMP, so i can add Big Integer support. I am trying to change Kaleidoscope to support BigIntegers instead of doubles, but I don't really know how to do that. I'd really appreciate some help in this. Thanks in advance Paulo Matias

...oking to LLVM, in order to develop a compiler for a > cryptography oriented language. I started by following the tutorials on > Kaleidoscope, and I must say they were very usefull. Now I need to use > GMP, so i can add Big Integer support. I am trying to change > Kaleidoscope to support BigIntegers instead of doubles, but I don't > really know how to do that. I'd really appreciate some help in this. > > Thanks in advance > Paulo Matias > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs....

...ail.com> wrote: > I am unable to install the gmp package on an x86_64 (Xeon) machine. I > have had the same problem with other packages (eg. MCMCpack) as well. > I am running Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4.1. > I get the following error: > > g++ -shared -L/usr/local/lib64 -o gmp.so biginteger.o > biginteger_operator.o bigintegerR.o bigrational.o > bigrational_operator.o bigrationalR.o factor.o -L/usr/local/lib/ -lgmp > /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/3.4.3/libstdc++.a(functexcept.o): > relocation R_X86_64_32 against `std::bad_exception::~bad_exception()' &g...

I got sidetracked while benchmarking ruby factorial code: http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Factorial#Ruby I put all that code into test_fact.rb and ran with: > ruby test_fact.rb > rails runner test_fact.rb #from a fresh rails app > rails runner test_fact.rb #from a mature rails app here are the respective results: user system total real #ruby recursive:

Hi, I''ve started reading some Java books. Gasp! What makes website development with Java so bad? I haven''t looked at Struts but I''m reading about Hibernate. Compared to ActiveRecord, Hibernate seems like some extra typing to explicitly define the model fields, getters and setters. I know that these are things that you can do in ActiveRecord when things get complicated