search for: bigfiles

I'm running RedHat 8.0 with samba-2.2.7-5.8.0 (installed from RedHat distribution) When I use cpio to write a backup (> 2GB) to a smbfs filesystem, I get the error: File size limit exceeded I get the same error when I linux copy (cp) a file (> 2GB) from a Linux ext3 filesystem to the smbfs filesystem. The smbfs filesystem is mounted from a Windows 2000 Professional workstation. After

We have been using ZFS for user home directories for a good while now. When we discovered the problem with full filesystems not allowing deletes over NFS, we became very anxious to fix this; our users fill their quotas on a fairly regular basis, so it''s important that they have a simple recourse to fix this (e.g., rm). I played around with this on my OpenSolaris box at home, read around

Hi everybody, the following alway gives me the error "Fehler in if (File$X.Frame.Number[a] + 1 == File$X.Frame.Number[a + 1]) (File$FishNr[a] <- File$FishNr[a - : Fehlender Wert, wo TRUE/FALSE n?tig ist". Maybe its stupid, but i'm not getting why... Maybe someone can help me. Thanks a lot! for (i in unique(BigFile$TrackAll)) { File <-

Hi, I m facing problem in "rsync" rtelated to the time-stamp of the files. Im using rsync for transfering the file from my m/c (OS :jaluna-linux) to a remote m/c(OS:jaluna-linux) and even if there was no change in the files on my m/c, when i rsync them to remote m/c the time-stamp of the file on remote m/c (which i transfered from my m/c) will change. my file name is bigfile and it is

Helle everyone, Let's say we have 3 servers, 2 of them have the latest (stable) version of rsyncd running (2.6.9) <Server1> ==> I N T E R N E T ==> <Server2 (rsyncd running)> ==> LAN ==> <Server3 (rsyncd running)> Suppose I want to send a big file (bigfile.big) from Server1 to both Server2 and Server3. It would be a good idea to send first from Server1

Is there any chance for rdiff ? I need to frequently synchronize big text file (60MB+) undertaking small changes and I am interested in differences between the subsequent versions [DNS RBL data in dnsbl format, 1E6+ lines of text, new version every 20m, on average 50 new entries (lines) in every synchronization] I would like to get (small) diff file as result of rsync session and apply it to

--delete --force Won't Remove Directories With Dotnames rsync 2.6.9 Me, personally, I reckon this to be an irritant ... but perhaps (and having thought about this a bit I decided it's a good chance) this is an intentional and useful behaviour. But it's a nuisance if you call your --partial-dir .partial, as I happen to do, since now if you remove a directory which was aborted in

I want to use --min-size to copy just large files (and their necessary parent directories), but everything I've tried copies *all* the source directories, and creates them empty on the destination even if they don't have any big files in them. I only want the minimal directory hierarchies that contain the big files. This doesn't work: $ rm -rf /tmp/foo $ rsync -ai --min-size

Dear OpenSSH developers, OpenSSH setting non-blocking mode on its standard files creates serious problems. Setting non-blocking mode violates many of the semantics of how files are supposed to behave and most programs (and most, if not all, stdio libraries) are not prepared to deal with it. That wouldn't be a problem except that non-blocking mode is not a property of the file descriptor but

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Matt Garman <matthew.garman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> wrote: >> The machines are on a local network. I access them with putty from a >> windows machine, but I have to be at the site to do that. > > So that means when you are offsite there is no way to access

Hi there, I'm using RH7.2 (with the 2.4.9-30 kernal and it's required components) as a base for a server system running kernel 2.4.18. I've gone to this version to get around non-performing aic7xxx drivers in the stock 7.2 kernels, and updated gigabit ethernet drivers. I have a raid unit (Medea) attached to an Adaptec 3916, coming up as sdb. It has 2kb blocks, but the fault

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1558 Summary: Sftp client does not correctly process server response messages after write error Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.3p2 Platform: amd64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sftp

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Dario Lesca <d.lesca at solinos.it> wrote: > the result. # du -sc /* /.??* --exclude /proc|sort -n 0 /.autofsck 0 /.autorelabel 0 /misc 0 /net 0 /sys 4 /cgroup 4 /media 4 /mnt 4 /selinux 4 /srv 8 /opt 16 /home 16 /lost+found 16 /tmp 112 /root 188 /dev 7956 /bin

...amily read only = No inherit permissions = Yes guest ok = Yes max connections = 20 [files] comment = ALL File Storage HERE! path = /files admin users = mbruntel cbruntel moogirl zbruntel force group = family read only = No inherit permissions = Yes guest ok = Yes max connections = 20 [bigfiles] comment = Big&Files Directory path = /files admin users = mbruntel cbruntel zbruntel moogirl force group = family read only = No inherit permissions = Yes guest ok = Yes max connections = 20 [cdrom] comment = LINUX CDROM! R-0 path = /cd guest ok = Yes max connections = 1 fake opl...

Hi everyone, This is a strange problem I have been having. I'm not sure where the problem is, so I figured I'd start here. I as having problems with Bacula stopping on 17Gig Volume sizes, so I decided to try to Just dd a 50 gig file. Sure enough, once the file hit 17 gigs dd stopped and spit out an error (pandora bacula)# dd if=/dev/zero of=bigfile bs=1M count=50000 File size

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> wrote: > Again, no machine on the internal network that my 2 CentOS hosts are > on are connected to the internet. I have no way to download anything., > There is an onerous and protracted process to get files into the > internal network and I will see if I can get netperf in. Right, but do you have

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10336 Summary: Time in file listing with --list-only option is inconsistent whether dst is given or not Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8512 Summary: rsync -a slower than cp -a Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: linux.news at bucksch.org QAContact:

I have a quick question about rsync's writing of files. I have a team of people that all use the host BigServer, which is running rsync as a deamon, as a central place to keep all shared files backed up. The "master copy" for any given file is considered to be the local file that somebody has worked on -- i.e., BigServer is NOT considered the master copy. BigServer is the backup

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Matt Garman <matthew.garman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> wrote: >> Again, no machine on the internal network that my 2 CentOS hosts are >> on are connected to the internet. I have no way to download anything., >> There is an onerous and protracted process to get