search for: bigbyv

Hi Renato, > I was recently investigating the build bot infrastructure and noticed > that the arm-linux target is failing for quite a long time. I believe > that it means ARM code is not executed all that often in LLVM tests, > is that correct? > > We were wondering what kind of support we could give to make sure ARM > code is correct and don't regress, specially before

...011/builders/llvm-arm-linux/builds/754 - Revision: 128836 last successful ARM build by the builder http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/llvm-arm-linux/builds/755 - Revision: 128851 failed build http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/llvm-arm-linux/builds/756 - Revision: 128873 failed 2010-11-04-bigbyval.ll <http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/llvm-arm-linux/builds/756/steps/test-llvm/logs/2010-11-04-bigbyval.ll> ... 757 - 759 - dito http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/llvm-arm-linux/builds/760 - Revision: 128895 failed 2009-03-17-lsr-apint.ll <http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/bui...

Hi all, I was recently investigating the build bot infrastructure and noticed that the arm-linux target is failing for quite a long time. I believe that it means ARM code is not executed all that often in LLVM tests, is that correct? We were wondering what kind of support we could give to make sure ARM code is correct and don't regress, specially before releases (I know it's a bit late

...odeGen/Generic/2007-12-17-InvokeAsm.ll LLVM : : CodeGen/Generic/2008-01-30-LoadCrash.ll LLVM : : CodeGen/Generic/2008-02-04-Ctlz.ll LLVM : : CodeGen/Generic/2009-03-17-LSR-APInt.ll LLVM : : CodeGen/Generic/2009-11-16-BadKillsCrash.ll LLVM : : CodeGen/Generic/2010-11-04-BigByval.ll LLVM : : CodeGen/Generic/add-with-overflow-128.ll LLVM : : CodeGen/Generic/badCallArgLRLLVM.ll LLVM : : CodeGen/Generic/badarg6.ll LLVM : : CodeGen/Generic/builtin-expect.ll LLVM : : CodeGen/Generic/crash.ll LLVM : : CodeGen/Generic/exception-handling.ll...