search for: bidirectional_rsync

...out with a unison sync, but being the impatient > > person I am, I needed more real time. > > > > Now my problem is with the permissions in the sysvol folder structure. > > > > Sorry, but your problem is that you missed this: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bidirectional_Rsync/osync_ > based_SysVol_replication_workaround#FAQ > > Where it quite clearly says this: > > Why can't I simply use a distributed filesystem like GlusterFS, > Lustre, etc. for SysVol? > A cluster file system with Samba requires CTDB to be able to do it > safel...

...time. > > > > > > > > Now my problem is with the permissions in the sysvol folder > > > > structure. > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, but your problem is that you missed this: > > > > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bidirectional_Rsync/osync_ > > > based_SysVol_replication_workaround#FAQ > > > > > > Where it quite clearly says this: > > > > > > Why can't I simply use a distributed filesystem like GlusterFS, > > > Lustre, etc. for SysVol? > > > A clust...

Hi Guys, I have run into a very interesting problem using GPO's on our DC's. As you may (or may not) know, we have migrated to a pure Samba4 (Git stable branch checkout) AD network. I can't be happier. *Kudos to the Samba team* We are running to DC's, DC1 and DC2, both full fledged DC's, both running CentOS 6.9, fully up to date. For the sysvol partition I decided to run a

Hi list, I recently realized that using multiple DC has a major drawback when using Samba In my understanding, in a classical AD environment, sysvol share is supposed to be a DFS share. This means that proximity rules are applied when accessing to it. When using samba it seems that we face a classical round-robin DNS, which can lead to the situation where a machine on site A tries to fetch

...gt; > person I am, I needed more real time. > > > > > > Now my problem is with the permissions in the sysvol folder > > > structure. > > > > > > > Sorry, but your problem is that you missed this: > > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bidirectional_Rsync/osync_ > > based_SysVol_replication_workaround#FAQ > > > > Where it quite clearly says this: > > > > Why can't I simply use a distributed filesystem like GlusterFS, > > Lustre, etc. for SysVol? > > A cluster file system with Samba requires...

Hello, I am wondering whether I have all pieces together for a scenatio with two DCs and GPOs being used. Obviously the GPOs need to be replicated between DCs, I use "osync" as per the samba wiki (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bidirectional_Rsync/osync_based_SysVol_replication_workaround). In that documentation the sysvolreset command is issued every time on the second DC after a successful sync. On the other hand, the page https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Sysvolreset claims that one should never run sysvolreset or even sysvolcheck (!?...

Hi Igor, Am 26.08.2016 um 13:23 schrieb Igor & Sandra: > I am part of a group of studies and learning samba 4. > The greatest difficulty is the language, many do not know English. > We set up a team to translate the documentation Samba 4 for our > language. > We would like to take the translation into Portuguese and make it > official. As said in my previous mail: Our

...were to follow https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Samba_DC_to_an_Existing_Active_Directory In the Built-in Groups GID Mappings section the last thing it says to do is run samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset. If I skip that step will the replication still work? On https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bidirectional_Rsync/osync_based_SysVol_replication_workaround they actually recommend running samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset every time osync runs. If I skip the steps that say to reset the sysvol is that going to cause problems? If resetting the sysvol is required, how do I keep it from causing problems? FWIW, I am t...

...ts.samba.org>, wrote: > Hello, > > I am wondering whether I have all pieces together for a scenatio with > two DCs and GPOs being used. > Obviously the GPOs need to be replicated between DCs, I use "osync" as > per the samba wiki > (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bidirectional_Rsync/osync_based_SysVol_replication_workaround). > > In that documentation the sysvolreset command is issued every time on > the second DC after a successful sync. > > On the other hand, the page https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Sysvolreset > claims that one should never run sysvolrese...

Hi, I would like to know which the best way to replicate Sysvol between my DC Samba 4 is with Rsync/Osync, as per the article below? https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bidirectional_Rsync/osync_based_SysVol_replication_workaround I have 3 Samba 4 DC. Regards, M?rcio Bacci

Any plane in future to build-in Samba SysVol replication (DFS-R) ? For now we have this workaround at link: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Rsync_based_SysVol_replication_workaround

Yes, something like. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bidirectional_Rsync/Unison_based_SysVol_replication_workaround https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Active_Directory_Sites and if needed you can also set a "prefferred" server per OU or site in GPO. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba....

...a bug in the sysvolreset command. Only do it once ON THE NEW SERVER and NEVER do it again on ANY server or you WILL BREAK THINGS. Search the recent archives of this list for more info. > Apparently a SysVol replication workaround must be implemented: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bidirectional_Rsync/Unison_based_SysVol_replication_workaround I use osync, but yes you must use a workaround. You get to pick. :-) > > Does only one server at a time own the FSMO roles? Yes!! That is the way both Samba AD and MS AD work. > > Is it OK for the new DC to use 4.5 if the existing DC uses 4...

...between the > DC's. I started out with a unison sync, but being the impatient > person I am, I needed more real time. > > Now my problem is with the permissions in the sysvol folder structure. > Sorry, but your problem is that you missed this: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bidirectional_Rsync/osync_based_SysVol_replication_workaround#FAQ Where it quite clearly says this: Why can't I simply use a distributed filesystem like GlusterFS, Lustre, etc. for SysVol? A cluster file system with Samba requires CTDB to be able to do it safely. And CTDB and AD DC are incompatible....

...plication_(DFS-R) [2] https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Rsync_based_SysVol_replication_workaround#Information_on_rsync-based_replication [3] https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Samba_DC_to_an_Existing_Active_Directory#Built-in_User_.26_Group_ID_Mappings [4] https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bidirectional_Rsync/Unison_based_SysVol_replication_workaround [5] https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/248668/sync-muliple-pcs-with-unison/546309#546309 On Fri, 2019-10-25 at 12:31 +0200, Ivan Juri?i? via samba wrote: > Any plane in future to build-in Samba SysVol replication (DFS-R) ? > > For now we...

Hai, Sorry for the late reply, but yes, this is a risky move. Did you make sure this the DOMAIN SID's are exact the same between old and new servers? This: rsync -av --progress --xattrs --rsh=ssh Does not copy the (windows) acl's. Look at https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bidirectional_Rsync/Unison_based_SysVol_replication_workaround Howto to this with rsync and unison, the combination catches the acl also. I suggest the following, or do the copy from a windows client or the following. Create a new user on the new server and login /logout with a pc. Check the user profile right...

...Ray > Verzonden: vrijdag 8 april 2016 9:59 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] GPO, multiple DCs, sites and sysvol > > > Le 08/04/2016 09:54, L.P.H. van Belle a écrit : > > Yes, something like. > > > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bidirectional_Rsync/Unison_based_SysVol_r > eplication_workaround > > Don't care, I always edit GPO on PDC FSMO DC and rsync from there > > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Active_Directory_Sites > > Yes, I use them, it works for the DC selection but GPO are still fetched > in...

On Sun, 2 Oct 2016 11:45:15 +0200 Achim Gottinger via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Am 02.10.2016 um 08:20 schrieb Trenta sis via samba: > > Hi, > > > > I have a samba 4.4.5 AD domain and is working perfect, but now I > > need to add a second samba 4 AD, I have found that in > >

OK, now i've to start to move the big part of my users from my old NT-like domains to my new AD domain. I've setup roaming profile in the new domain following the wiki (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Roaming_Windows_User_Profiles, 'using windows ACL') and for new profiles works like a charm. But i've tried to move/copy old profile to the new domain, and seems work, with

On 09/11/2016 01:23 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Sun, 11 Sep 2016 00:48:09 -0600 > "Paul R. Ganci via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> essentially do what I want? Basically clone the AD on another server. >> Then is it as easy as joining the new server to the domain and then >> demoting the old server? How do others do this task? >