search for: bics

I'm using R 2.0.1. I looked in the email archives but didn't see anything on this topic. I've noticed a surprising (to me) difference between AIC and BIC: > methods("AIC") [1] AIC.default* AIC.logLik* > methods("BIC") [1] BIC.gls* BIC.lm* BIC.lme* BIC.lmList* BIC.logLik* BIC.nls* The BIC.gls BIC.lm BIC.lme BIC.lmList and BIC.nls functions appear

>>>>> "MM" == Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> >>>>> on Tue, 18 May 2010 12:37:21 +0200 writes: >>>>> "GaGr" == Gabor Grothendieck <ggrothendieck at gmail.com> >>>>> on Mon, 17 May 2010 09:45:00 -0400 writes: GaGr> BIC seems like something that would logically go into stats

Dear R-List I have a question about how to interpret BIC as a goodness-of-fit statistic. I was trying to use "EMclust" and other "mclust" library and found that BIC was used as a goodness-of-fit statistic. Although I know that smaller BIC indicates a better fit, it is not clear to me how good a fit is by reading a BIC number. Is there a standard way of interpreting a BIC

Hi, My questions concern the function 'mclustBIC' which compute BIC for a range of clusters of several models on the given data and the other function 'mclustModel' which choose the best model and the best number of cluster accordind to the results of the previous cited function. 1) When trying the following example (see ?mclustModel), I get negative BIC computed by

Dear List Members, I have encountered two problems when using the step function to select models. To better illustrate the problems, attached is an R image which includes the objects needed to run the code attached. lm.data.frame have factor variables with 3 levels. The following run shows the first problem. AICs (* and **) are different. I noticed that the Df for rs13482096:rs13483699 is 4,

Hi, I have 45 models that I have named: 1, 2, 3, ... , 45 and I am trying to plot them in order of ascending BIC values. I am however unclear as to how I can get the models to line up on the x-axis by BIC and not by numeric order. For example, if model 5 has a lower BIC than 1, I want it to be the first point on the left hand side of the curve. This seems to work in plot: plot(1:45,

Hi, I have 45 models that I have named: 1, 2, 3, ... , 45 and I am trying to plot them in order of ascending BIC values. I am however unclear as to how I can get the models to line up on the x-axis by BIC and not by numeric order. For example, if model 5 has a lower BIC than 1, I want it to be the first point on the left hand side of the curve. This seems to work in plot: plot(1:45,

Hi All, Could someone help me decode what this error means ? > BIC(nb.80) Error in log(attr(object, "nobs")) : Non-numeric argument to mathematical function > BTW, nb.80 is a negative binomial glm model created using the MASS library with the call at the bottom of the message In the hopes of trying to figure this out I tried the following workaround but it did not work

The function 'regsubsets' appears to calculate a BIC value that is different from that returned by the function 'BIC'. The latter is explained in the documentation, but I can't find an expression for the statistic returned by 'regsubsets'. Incidentally, both of these differ from the BIC that is given in Ramsey and Schafer's, The Statistical Sleuth. I assume

Hello, I am working on getting optimal lags by using BIC, But I don't know how to calculate BIC. Is there any code or useful function for it? Thanks and regards, Dan Zhao

Hi Folks, I've got a question concerning the calculation of the Schwarz-Criterion (BIC) done by summary.regsubsets() of the leaps-package: Using regsubsets() to perform subset-selection I receive an regsubsets object that can be summarized by summary.regsubsets(). After this operation the resulting summary contains a vector of BIC-values representing models of size i=1,...,K. My problem

Hi all, I would like to know how the BIC criterion is calculated for models estimated using gls( ) function. I read in Pinheiro & Bates (2000) p84 that BIC = -2logL + npar*log(N) (for the ML method), or BIC = -2logLR + npar*log(N-p) (for the REML method) but when I use any of these formulae I don't obtain the result given by R. Thanks in advance for any help. Eve CORDA Office national

Hi All,  In order to compare two different logistic regressions, I think I need to compare them based on their BIC values, but I am not sure if the smaller BIC would mean a better model or the reverse is true? Thanks a lot,Andra [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I'm coming from the AMOS world and am wondering if there is a simple way to do multiple hypothesis testing in the manner of BIC analyses in AMOS using the sem package in R. I've read the documentation, but don't see anything in there except for basic BIC scores. Perhaps someone has devised a simple way to compare the relative likelihood of all possible path-fittings within a

Full_Name: Ju-Sung Lee Version: 2.2.0 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (66.93.61.221) BIC() requires the attribute $nobs from the logLik object but the logLik of a glm(formula,family=binomial()) object does not include $nobs. Adding attr(obj,'nobs') = value, seems to allow BIC() to work. Reproducing the problem: library(nmle); BIC(logLik(glm(1~1,family=binomial())));

DeaRs, I have a doubt about: BIC (Bayesian Information Criterion) SBIC (Schwartz Bayesian Informarion Criterion) SIC (Schwartz Information Criterion) In many references these are know as the same (eg. stepAIC() function) but I just found a SAS8.2 output that show either the BIC and SIC values for a logistic regression.. simillary values but different. 1) question: What are the differences?

list, i am using lmer to fit multilevel models and trying to use anova to compare the models. however, whenever i run the anova, the AIC, BIC and loglik are different from the original model output- as below. can someone help me out with why this is happening? (i'm hoping the output assocaited with the anova is right!). thank you, darren > unconditional<-lmer(log50 ~ 1 + (1 |

Dear List Members, I have encountered two problems when using the step function to select models. To better illustrate the problems, an R image (step.add1.test.RData) which includes the objects needed to run the code (step.add1.test.R) can be found at www.biostat.wisc.edu/~pwang/r-help/<http://www.biostat.wisc.edu/%7Epwang/r-help/> lm.data.frame have factor variables with 3 levels. The

Hi All: the package "MuMIn" can be used to select the model based on AIC or AICc. The code is as follows: data(Cement) lm1 <- lm(y ~ ., data = Cement) dd <- dredge(lm1,rank="AIC") print(dd) If I want to select the model by BIC, what code do I need to use? And when to select the best model based on AIC, what the differences between the function "dredge" in

Hi, Is there any package for logistic model selection using BIC and Mallow's Cp statistic? If not, then kindly suggest me some ways to deal with these problems. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Stepwise-logistic-model-selection-using-Cp-and-BIC-criteria-tf4464430.html#a12729613 Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.