Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "bhs2".
Did you mean:
bhs
2005 Oct 18
0
Packages in R and in S-PLUS
...02 2360
Fax: +1 (206) 283 6310
Insightful 2005 User Conference
Princeton, NJ, Oct. 26-27, 2005
Don't miss the keynote by Dr. William Meeker
Special Pricing: $199 commercial/$99 academic
www.insightful.com/news_events/2005uc
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bj??rn-Helge Mevik [mailto:bhs2 at mevik.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 2:20 AM
> To: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch
> Subject: Re: [R] Insightful Announces: "R and S-PLUS- Panel
> Discussion"
> at9th Annual 2005 User Conference
>
>
> Michael O'Connell wrote:
>
> > tools to...
2007 Nov 14
3
When to use LazyLoad, LazyData and ZipData?
Dear developeRs,
I've searched the documentation, FAQ, and mailing lists, but haven't
found the answer(*) to the following:
When should one specify LazyLoad, LazyData, and ZipData?
And what is the default if they are left unspecified?
(*)Except that
1) If the package you are writing uses the methods package, specify
LazyLoad: yes, and
2) The optional ZipData field controls whether the
2004 Aug 31
2
Dimension of apply(X, MARGIN, FUN) when FUN returns a matrix
Dear all,
apply(X, MARGIN, FUN, ...) returns an array of dimension
c(n, dim(X)[MARGIN]) when FUN returns a vector of length n > 1.
Matrices and arrays are also vectors, so if FUN returns a matrix or an
array, apply returns an array of dimension c(n, dim(X)[MARGIN]) as
above. This is in accordance with the description of apply in the
Blue Book, and also how Splus works (at least v6.0).
I am
2006 Apr 09
1
make check of R-alpha_2006-04-08_r37675 fails: qbeta
make check of R-alpha_2006-04-08_r37675 fails on Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 running
on an Intel P4 computer.
> version
_
platform i686-pc-linux-gnu
arch i686
os linux-gnu
system i686, linux-gnu
status
2006 May 12
1
Dropping dimnames doesn't matter (anymore)?
In the "old days", one way of speeding up matrix calculations was to
drop the dimnames of the matrices prior to the calculations, i.e.,
dimnames(X) <- NULL. I distinctly remember that this could have a
great impact at least in Splus 3.x (under UNIX/Linux).
I just did a small, informal test of this with a couple of functions I
use to fit plsr models, in R 2.3.0 (Linux). It
2005 Mar 31
1
R-alpha_2005-03-31: make check fails on Debian 3.0
I've just tested R-alpha_2005-03-31.tar.gz. ./configure and make
ran without any apparent errors, but make check failed:
58 (0) $ make check 2>&1 | tee make_check-logg
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/R/R-alpha/tests'
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/R/R-alpha/tests'
make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/R/R-alpha/tests/Examples'
make[4]:
2005 Dec 14
3
R-beta: configure problem (tcltk) on 64 bit Red Hat EL
Dear developeRs,
I use Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS release 4 (Nahant Update 2) on an
x86_64 machine (two Intel P4 CPUs with 64 bit support), and
R-beta_2005-12-12_r36712.tar.gz.
If I run configure without any options, it does not list tcltk among
the supported interfaces:
./configure
[...]
R is now configured for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Source directory: .
Installation directory: