search for: bh_req

...} printk("VFS: brelse: Trying to free free buffer\n"); *(int *)0 = 0; } 2) include/linux/fs.h Can I still just increase by one from BH_Temp on as advised here https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/ext3-users/2001-April/000448.html ===== ext3 patch --- 197,221 ---- #define BH_Req 3 /* 0 if the buffer has been invalidated */ #define BH_Protected 6 /* 1 if the buffer is protected */ #define BH_Req 3 /* 0 if the buffer has been invalidated */ #define BH_Protected 6 /* 1 if the buffer is protected */ #define BH_Wait_IO 7 /* 1 if we should th...

...ave come across an interesting conflict. I want to include the raid patch that Red Hat includes in their kernel but that patch includes the following hunk: --- linux/include/linux/fs.h.orig Tue Jan 16 13:30:09 2001 +++ linux/include/linux/fs.h Tue Jan 16 13:47:18 2001 @@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ #define BH_Req 3 /* 0 if the buffer has been invalidated */ #define BH_Protected 6 /* 1 if the buffer is protected */ #define BH_Wait_IO 7 /* 1 if we should throttle on this buffer */ +#define BH_LowPrio 8 /* 1 if the buffer is lowprio */ /* * Try to keep the most commonly used fields in single cache line...