Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "bh_protected".
2001 Jul 13
0
0.0.7a + rh2.2.19: help solve rejects
...*(int *)0 = 0;
}
2)
include/linux/fs.h
Can I still just increase by one from BH_Temp on as advised here
https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/ext3-users/2001-April/000448.html
===== ext3 patch
--- 197,221 ----
#define BH_Req 3 /* 0 if the buffer has been invalidated */
#define BH_Protected 6 /* 1 if the buffer is protected */
#define BH_Req 3 /* 0 if the buffer has been invalidated */
#define BH_Protected 6 /* 1 if the buffer is protected */
#define BH_Wait_IO 7 /* 1 if we should throttle on this buffer */
+ #define BH_Temp 8 /* 1 if the buffer is te...
2001 Apr 19
1
0.0.6b conflict with raid patch
...e raid patch that
Red Hat includes in their kernel but that patch includes the following
hunk:
--- linux/include/linux/fs.h.orig Tue Jan 16 13:30:09 2001
+++ linux/include/linux/fs.h Tue Jan 16 13:47:18 2001
@@ -191,6 +191,7 @@
#define BH_Req 3 /* 0 if the buffer has been invalidated */
#define BH_Protected 6 /* 1 if the buffer is protected */
#define BH_Wait_IO 7 /* 1 if we should throttle on this buffer */
+#define BH_LowPrio 8 /* 1 if the buffer is lowprio */
/*
* Try to keep the most commonly used fields in single cache lines (16
ext3 0.0.6b has the following hunk in it:
--- linux-2.2.19...
2001 Jul 29
1
2.2.19/0.0.7a: bonnie -> VM problems
...tate));
return;
}
printk("VFS: brelse: Trying to free free buffer\n");
+ J_ASSERT(buf->b_count > 0);
*(int *)0 = 0; <== This is RH specific, I chose to put J_ASSERT before it
}
2)
+1 to all added stuff
include/linux/fs.h
@@ -192,6 +192,25 @@
#define BH_Protected 6 /* 1 if the buffer is protected */
#define BH_Wait_IO 7 /* 1 if we should throttle on this buffer */
#define BH_LowPrio 8 /* 1 if the buffer is lowprio */
+#define BH_Temp 9 /* 1 if the buffer is temporary (unlinked) */
+#define BH_JWrite 10 /* 1 if being written to log (@@@...